Re: Oscillating ventilation
Not true, sunny. I've found journal articles dating back to 2003 discussing the efficacy of HFOV for adults with ARDS, others that discuss best practice strategies and
http://ccforum.com/content/7/5/385
It has recently been shown that strategies aimed at preventing ventilator-induced lung injury, such as ventilating with low tidal volumes, can reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) seems ideally suited as a lung-protective strategy for these patients...
http://www.ecu.edu/cs-dhs/pulmonary/...osc%20vent.pdf
Ventilator settings typically used for high-frequency
oscillatory ventilation (HFO) in adults provide acceptable gas
exchange but may not take best advantage of its lung-protective
aspects. We provide guidelines for HFO in adults with acute
respiratory distress syndrome that should optimize the lungprotective
characteristics of this ventilation mode...
http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/co...full/166/6/801
Observational studies of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome have demonstrated improvements in oxygenation. We designed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with conventional ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome... We conclude that high-frequency oscillation is a safe and effective mode of ventilation for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults.
The amplitude (tidal volume) of each oscillation is adjustable. We typically use 5-10 mL/kg not 5-10 mL/oscillation. And the Hz is also adjustable. The point of HFOV is to splint the lungs open and it does that quite effectively even in adults.
Nursing News