Content That LOVEGREEN Likes

LOVEGREEN 2,174 Views

Joined Aug 4, '12 - from 'Central NY US'. LOVEGREEN is a RN. She has '4' year(s) of experience. Posts: 12 (50% Liked) Likes: 43

Sorted By Last Like Given (Max 500)
  • Dec 2

    Ain't nobody got time for that. We are ALL rushed in our documentation. As long as you can interpret it correctly.. why care?
    There are MUCH bigger things to be ashamed of, that medical professionals are doing wrong.

  • Dec 1

    It's cheaper. I went to a potluck yesterday and bought two fruit trays - $30.00. I could have spent half that on pre-made cookies. And even less if I had made them myself.

  • Dec 1

    Quote from elkpark
    In both of your examples (taking friend's Vicodin vs. stealing from work and smoking pot vs. using heroin), while you may not agree or approve, both behaviors are equally illegal (at least, on the Federal level, and I haven't yet heard of any state BONs relaxing their stands on pot).
    But the BON doesn't exist to prosecute crime. It exists to regulate and enforce standards of nursing practice and to ensure that nurses are competent while on the job. Just because you may make questionable decisions off the job does not make you an incompetent nurse. This is tacitly acknowledged by BONs who do not sanction or monitor nurses who get speeding tickets although speeding is just as illegal as smoking pot.

    And while illegal is illegal, the judicial system does acknowledge that there are magnitudes of illegal behavior (misdemeanors, felonies) and that not all illegal actions warrant the same punishment. This is not done very well by BONs.

  • Dec 1

    A sense of humor helps ...and getting through the material fast (or at least breaking it up into small sections). People are going to get bored anyway, though. Orientation is just not a fascinating thing.

  • Nov 14

    Anyways, I would like to thank those who offered constructive criticism.

    It has all been constructive. It is your choice as to whether or not to see it that way.

  • Nov 6

    Quote from purplegal
    While it's very true that it would not be in their best interest to fire me, simply because I'm not able to work all of the hours they would want me to, it's not in my interest to take advantage of that. I'm also working this job to gain some good nursing experience and possible references, so I do feel the need to try and maintain a good relationship with management, if at all possible (though, sometimes their demands seem slightly unreasonable). I agree that staffing is their own issue, but I feel guilty leaving others in a bind, too.
    You know your situation better than I do.
    - if you absolutely NEED this place on your resume...
    - if you live and work in an area where it's hard for RNs to get new jobs and easy for facilities to replace their staff...
    - if you're having hard times financially and couldn't afford to look for a new job if it came to that...
    - if mandating staff is the way of the land where you are, enshrined by law and common practice...

    ... then, yeah, in those cases it might be advisable to just take the overtime, sleep be damned. But keep in mind the ultimate truth of the matter: you are being exploited. When your employer tells you to pull a double shift regardless of your personal circumstances and with the only 'incentive' being that your meek acquiescence will not make the Powers That Be angry, take the extra shift or not as your own personal circumstances allow. But FOR THE LOVE OF PETE, don't feel guilty about your decision.

  • Nov 2

    Quote from Been there,done that
    The patient is not a "drug addict", the patient has a history of drug abuse. Medicating the patient for an acute condition is the same as medicating any other patient.
    GET THEIR PAIN UNDER CONTROL. Give any ordered pain rx, if it is not effective get another order. The nurse that gave Tylenol needs to be educated and written up.
    You're right. +1 this.

    And just to be clear - even if the patient were a current drug addict, that is no justification for denying them pain medication in a situation where you would expect them to have significant pain (e.g. post-operatively). We don't torture patients in this country, drug addict or not. In fact, in such a situation, a patient with a history of opioid abuse will typically need a higher dose of pain medication than most patients to achieve the same degree of pain control due to their higher tolerance.

  • Nov 2

    The patient is not a "drug addict", the patient has a history of drug abuse. Medicating the patient for an acute condition is the same as medicating any other patient.
    GET THEIR PAIN UNDER CONTROL. Give any ordered pain rx, if it is not effective get another order. The nurse that gave Tylenol needs to be educated and written up.

  • Oct 16

    Hi - I wanted to increase some awareness about the most underused question to patients/families based on my recent experiences including a family pushing for a patient with endstage dementia to get a g-tube placement "because we can't let him starve to death" while at the same time saying "obviously we do not want the nurses to draw blood, take vitalsigns, or get an xray - we want him to be as comfortable as possible". Nothing matched the overall goals for the patient as identified by the family ("comfort") and got worse by the family's poor understanding of trade-off when it comes to therapies/interventions and the inability to understand that a certain treatment will not change the overall outcome or trajectory of illness (because the patient will continue to aspirate secretions and get pneumonia while the dementia functional decline increases further - but now we are prolonging the end of life with artificial nutrition and hydration and the patient will need restraints because of agitation).

    Unfortunately, despite the fact that there were other admission to the hospital, nobody had a conversation with the family to explain the illness, how it progresses, what is to be expected, and the choices for treatment plans/care plan once the illness is at a certain stage. Now in crisis mode the family is overwhelmed and they do want the patient to be comfortable but they also feel that they "need to give him a chance" (???) because the primary care physician who is biased about treatment choices told the family "he will starve to death" and "there is a feeding tube" while not talking as much about other options or implications.

    As nurses, you know that a lot of times out discussions and interactions are short and focus on the task on hand. Typical questions or discussions center around symptoms and scales "how would you rate your pain?" or "have you fallen the last 6 months?" and such.

    I want to encourage everybody to also consider some other important questions that will actually point to if the care plan / care we provide is congruent with the patient/family wishes. It becomes more important to also consider this piece as we have much more treatment choices and options but they all come with a trade-off and do not necessarily meet what a patient considers a goal or is important to them. Also, patients and families still often do not understand that they have choices when they face a serious illness or an advancing illness and getting closer to the point where the physician estimates a life expectancy of 6 months or less. Often times we can see "the writing on the wall" in the progression of a chronic or serious illness and know that things are changing in the trajectory of the illness.

    It is not the scope of a nurse to diagnose or to give a prognosis and the physician/ APN/PA conveys the diagnosis and prognosis. But as nurses we have another powerful tool which is based on a functional assessment. With a few questions you can usually get a good idea about "how patients are overall doing" because you also know their diagnosis from the MD.
    The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) is a validated tool which evaluates 5 items:
    Ambulation level, activity level /evidence of disease, self care, po intake, conscious level


    http://www.nhhpco.org/s-content/uplo...nce_Scale1.pdf

    When you assess those 5 domains and also ask "how was that before this episode of illness" or "how was that 6 months ago?" you can draw some conclusions about the functional decline, which usually points to overall disease and symptom burden especially in conjunction with diagnosed conditions.

    What is important is the difference in score or activities. Somebody can have a low functional status with a PPS 30% and stay in that state for some while especially when there is some artificial hydration or artificial nutrition is going on. But when a patient tells you that 6 months ago they were independent, able to walk, eat and drink, awake and now they are in the hospital and can't get out of bed, unable to eat or drink much, need help with all ADLs you know that there is something bigger going on.

    I find it important to ask patients who have a significant functional decline or who come in already very declined to also ask with the initial assessment or at any point later if time was too short
    "Can you tell me what is important to you?" and "do you have specific goals?"
    If the patient can't tell because of confusion/ inability to converse I ask the family. The goal is to initiate a discussion earlier in the disease process when people are less stressed out and able to think about it.

    It is important because as nurses we want to know our patients better and also understand if the care plan is matching their overall goals/ priorities/wishes. Nurses are in this unique position to identify when the care is not congruent because we see the patient throughout the shift / day and do not look at the diagnosis only. We can see the patient in a more holistic way.

    Have you ever wanted to pull your hair out because the specialist says to the patient/family "everything looks great - your heart is excellent" and the patient also has multiple other significant problems besides CHF like COPD, cancer, forgetfulness, diabetes, and can hardly get out of bed or take care of themselves ? Because as nurses we know that the spcialist is just addressing this one piece but the bigger picture conveys a different message.

    By asking about what is important to them and explore important goals, you can get an idea of congruence and you might be able to intervene and advocate for your patient in a different way.

    If a patient is chronically ill and let's say 85 y old and tells me that he only cares about "not feeling short of breath" and the overall ability to sit in the recliner and watch football and values some form of getting out of bed highly the care plan and treatment approach can be very different from somebody who is chronically ill and also 85 y and who says that the goal is to get to the granddaughter's wedding in 2 months and to go through aggressive treatment because that patient is willing to sacrifice / trade-off for example comfort if it means he can in the end go to the wedding.

    Nursing implications are to advocate and educate patients and families about the fact that they have choices and that they can talk to the physician about treatment that matches their overall goals and preferences best. Provider bias in some cases leads to families not knowing that they do not have to put in a feeding tube in end-stage dementia for example or that they can talk to the oncologist about stopping a palliative chemo that is making the patient so sick that the patient feels they are gaining some time (because it is not curative - will only extend time) but now they can not use the time for anything because they are constantly weak, nauseated, tired, and so on.
    Nurses often know instinctively that when a patient comes in more often or appears very sick that there should be a serious illness conversation preferably with a team/family meeting to make sure that there is a discussion about "where to go from there". In an ideal world, the primary care provider would have this discussion within their trusting relationship and before a crisis but we know that only a very small amount of patients have those discussions and often enough the hospital is the place where this happens.

    Nurses can help a lot by identifying when a patient needs to have a more comprehensive discussion about their goals, wishes, preferences if the illness gets worse. The goal is to make a "plan B" and discuss if the treatment/care plan is congruent with wishes.
    At times I mention to the provider what I learn from my questions to give them a different perspective and it can really shift the way providers talk to their patients about treatment options.
    When I tell the hospitalist that the patient feels strongly about spending quality time without pain/suffering and does not care about the amount of "time" that can get added - meaning quality of life becomes more important than just purely "longer life" it changes the approach and the way providers talk to patients. What I found is that they will also tell patients in this scenario the options but most often also add if that therapy or treatment will change the overall outcome or if it will most likely add mostly discomfort or negative things while not providing some benefit that is important to the patient. That influences what patients and families decide.
    If a provider explains that "yes, we can try the new immune-therapy for cancer that you have seen on TV but it will also take x weeks to work and will most likely have this and this side effects that could interfere with your goal to spend quality time with your family at home" instead of "let's try this immune-therapy" obviously the patients and families will start to think more about the trade-off.
    Nurses are the biggest advocates and patients appreciate when nurses advocate for them / give them the tools they need without pushing their own agenda.

  • Oct 14

    Quote from 1Sharon1
    Should I just quit nursing?
    If you just inherited a small fortune, then quit. If you have another degree in something highly marketable, look for something in that field. If you need the income and have no other marketable skills, sleep on it ...then wake up and go to work.

  • Oct 14

    If she stays then he knows exactly where to find her.

  • Sep 30

    Quote from smartnurse1982
    Let's say by 2030 80% of nurses have Bsn Degrees.
    What happens to the Lpn's and ADN Rn's that do not have one?
    Some ADN's will notice no difference - especially if they live in an area without a lot of BSN's. Some will simply stay in the current jobs and be fine as long as they never want to leave that job.
    Most will have problems getting a new job -- moving to another place or wanting to transfer to another department, etc. because they will have to compete against BSN's. So, many will be stuck having to stay where they are, or accepting jobs that are not very popular -- the jobs that most BSN's don't want.

    I've had friends in that situation already. Their jobs were secure and the ADN was acceptable to the employer -- but they wanted to leave and couldn't get another good job because they lacked the BSN. They were stuck.

  • Sep 17

    I don't think it's all that complicated; if people are always leaving because it's a ****** place to work, then make it a less ****** place to work.

  • Sep 8

    Don't know about the rest of you but I too am ...gasp... IN IT FOR THE MONEY! I expect to be PAID for what I do! But that's just me. The rest of you can volunteer if you want.

  • Sep 8

    Quote from Jenny.jsk
    There are a lot of people who choose nursing as a career for the money knowing too well that they don`t belong.
    I am one of the so-called dregs who entered nursing for the steady paycheck.

    Just imagine that your manager approached you one morning and announced, "I regret to inform you that we can no longer pay you for your services. However, I am sure you would not mind one bit. After all, your compassion will pay the bills and your devotion will keep food on the table."

    Would you continue to work your butt off without the promise of money in return? For me, the answer is "Heck no." I am shamelessly in it for the money.


close