Dembitz 3,277 Views
Joined Mar 5, '09 - from 'New England'.
Dembitz is a Nurse Practitioner.
She has '4' year(s) of experience.
Posts: 52 (40% Liked)
And, yet, there is Federal law that protects the right of healthcare providers to decline/refuse to participate in procedures/care to which they object on religious grounds (specifically written to protect anti-choice healthcare providers), so there is legal precedent and legal protections in place for individuals who have religious objections to particular aspects of healthcare.
I'm surprised at how many people here have posted that, if the OP has religious objections to some aspects of providing care, and his religious beliefs don't permit him to provide care for everyone, then he has not business going into healthcare. When anti-choice people come here to say that they want to go into healthcare but they have religious objections to abortion and are unwilling to participate in abortions, no one tells them that they shouldn't go into healthcare -- people practically line up here to assure them that they will be fine, there is law that protects their beliefs, they can't be compelled to participate, and all they have to do is work in a setting that won't involve abortion. That is all the OP is doing -- asking for suggestions about healthcare settings that would not conflict with his religious beliefs and observance.
Just as I don't believe that pharmacists should be able to refuse to sell Plan B due to religious beliefs, I don't believe health care providers should be allowed to pick and chose for whom they provide care based on religious beliefs. (That includes Catholic hospitals if they're getting government funding, but that's another issue, I suppose.) If your religion requires you to shun half of the population because of what does or does not dangle between their legs, you need to stay out of healthcare. Time for everyone to evolve.
I'm a Direct Entry graduate who worked for many years in a non-nursing health care profession before I went back to school. I have not worked bedside as a RN. I graduated 8 years ago and had no trouble finding a job at that time...No one cared about my lack of RN experience; employers were more concerned about my lack of NP experience. I don't think not having bedside RN experience has hindered me at all. I use very little of what I learned in the RN portion of my program.
If you choose to go this route, select a reputable school with a competitive program. You don't want to go to a school that has low admission standards. Be willing to go over and above the minimum clinical requirements, as the more clinical time you can get, the better. Sadly, also be prepared to hear a lot of negativity from nurses who cannot see how DE grads can be successful NPs. Work hard, do your absolute best, and let your performance speak for itself.
Can you get a note form your OB saying it is against her medical advice at this time that you receive it?
My sister has endometriosis and goes to a gynecologist that suddenly decided to stop prescribing birth control, no matter what the condition. I would also like to clarify that this wasn't part of a religious healthcare system, it was just because of his personal beliefs. My sister is non-medical and liked/trusted him while he offered her "other alternatives" and suffered for so long before (thankfully) having her first child. I just couldn't understand somebody going into that field and not offering such a major service. It still gets under my skin. I felt like it was unethical in a way - like a previous person said, as a provider its your job to lay out all of the options and give your patient the choice if they understand the risks.
If you feel strongly against the CDC vaccine schedule, I would suggest finding a job where that wont be part of your duties. I'm just not sure what your response is if you are ever questioned by a lawyer about why a child died of meningitis or epiglottitis or pneumonia because they were not given the HiB vaccine when indicated, especially if you were following your own schedule and the parent didn't know it wasn't CDC guidelines.
In general, I have a lot of difficulty understanding a provider that puts their personal beliefs ahead of research or patient autonomy. I feels like it crosses a line and makes me feel uncomfortable. I wouldn't want my physician to withhold treatment from me or slant their "speech" about treatment options and leave out certain ones based on personal beliefs. If they disagree because of experience or research, thats totally justifiable. But patients put their faith in you as a provider to guide them. If you have personal beliefs that aren't backed up by evidenced based practice and practice guidelines, I would really just suggest finding a job where those beliefs don't conflict with your job.
All this is said with respect and isn't a personal attack, I promise. It really is just to give you perspective from the other side.
One way to look at this is to consider the numbers:
The number of NP graduates between 2010-2013 is about 52,000.
The number of RN graduates between 2010-2013 is about 144,000.
The number of NP graduates in 2010 was 11,000 and in 2015 it was 20,000.
By workforce data:
In 2011 there were about 100,000 NPs and that increased to 128,000 in 2014, a 28% increase over 4 years.
Between 2003 and 2014 the total number of nurses in the workforce increased from 2.44million to 3.04million, a 24% increase over 12 years.
It shows that the number of NPs is increasing exponentially but the number of NPs compared to the number of RNs remains a small fraction of the total RN workforce.
Interesting thread. This topic has been debated vigorously on the APRN and NP forums.
All available evidence indicates that NPs without RN experience are as likely, or more likely, to succeed in MSN programs. In addition, some studies indicate NPs without RN experience have superior clinical skills as evaluated by NPs and MDs. Not one single study has demonstrated that NPs without RN experience have worse patient outcomes. In addition, I fail to see how RN experience in an acute care setting helps in the primary care arena. Many primary care and outpatient specialists have told me they have no interest in hiring an NP or PA who only has acute care experience. Finally, ironically, this is similar to the MD vs NP debate. We all get frustrated with MDs arguing against full practice authority for NPs even though over 100 studies have shown NPs provide the same, or better, quality of patient care. So now we have RNs and NPs arguing that RN experience is necessary to be an NP, but without any supporting evidence.
I do believe we should have NP residency programs for new grads and the AANP, ANNC, and state level NP organizations should lead the way in helping us with policy, legislation, and funding to support this. It would be great if there was funding for residencies in underserved areas and NPs choosing this route could get tax breaks or some student loan forgiveness.
Online programs deliver didactic content online. Clinicals with preceptors are still required. There are many reputable online programs such as Frontier Nursing University.
With regard to online courses – if it is just lecture, then who cares? In fact, the advantage of an online lecture is you can listen to it as many times as you need, whenever you want. The only value to an in-person class is if there is substantial class participation and Q&A. Only a few of my MSN classes had that, and I went to a top school. There are online learning platforms that do provide for real-time student participation and allow the instructor to call on individual students. Online education is the future of education.
El-Banna MM, Briggs LA, Leslie MS, Athey EK, Pericak A, Falk NL, & Greene J. (2015). Does prior RN clinical experience predict academic success in graduate nurse practitioner programs? Journal of Nursing Education, 54(5):276-80. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150417-05.
Rich, E. R. (2005). Does RN experience relate to NP clinical skills? The Nurse Practitioner, 30(12), 53-56.
Rich, E. R., Jorden, M. E., & Taylor, C.J. (2001). Assessing successful entry into nurse practitioner practice: A literature review. Journal of the New York State Nurses Association, 32(2).
But the real problem, imo, lies with the schools telling her and a bazillion others "absolutely just pony up $50,000 and you too can be a NP." It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out a decade or so down the road. Remember Alina Health's ad?
"Allina Health does not hire new grads from all academic institutions. Many proprietary on-line schools do not meet Allina Health’s standards due to the minimal oversight of the student’s clinical experience, the high faculty/student ratio, and the lack of focus on national certification standards in the curriculum."
Ruby Vee will you be sharing your concerns with the CCNE? There is only a few days left for the survey.
I am a dyed in the wool liberal who doesn't live under a rock, and has no issues with anyone legally owning a gun, nurse or not.
Sweeping generalizations are usually inaccurate, Annie.
This was more common back in more sensible times. The patient is obviously a daily drinker and needs his maintenance dose.
My late husband got wine with meals in the hospital to help his appetite thanks to a very caring dietitian to whom I'm forever grateful.
America is still puritanical regarding alcoholic beverages. But with 5% of the world's population we consume 70% of the world's prescribed pharmaceuticals. We are one of 2 nations allowing direct to consumer advertising of drugs. Yet we get nervous at a daily glass of wine or 2.
Recently I heard our hospital will be forcing everyone to get a flu shot or they will have to wear a mask for their entire shift. I have had a reaction to it and usually just boost my immune system during flu season and this works well. I was told that even if we have had a reaction in the past and still don't get it, we wear a mask. This does not sit well with many of us at the hospital. Was wondering if others have experienced this and what they did.
Am I the only one in this thread dissagreing with her? Nope, I'm not. So why is she personally attacking me, but not someone else? Everyone is welcome to have an opinion, it's a discussion board. No need for personal nastiness.
And btw, I'm a GN, not a student.
"Garden variety" abscess I&D is a clean procedure. There's nothing wrong with setting it up as a sterile procedure, including doing appropriate skin prep but once that abscess is opened, whatever's in there comes out and completely wrecks sterility. Yes, the instruments used will be from a sterile pack but all that really does is limit the chance of new critters getting into the wound and causing a secondary infection on top of the initial one that was just drained. Abscesses can be packed or simply left open to drain. They're not closed. If an I&D was truly a sterile procedure, we'd close the wound to maintain sterility... but instead we leave the wounds open to drain. You can't keep those open, draining wounds sterile. Clean, yes but sterile, no. The body does an incredible job at cleaning up the mess...
I am not the only one having a different opinion than you, in this thread. Why the snark?
I suppose my views will go against the general grain...
There tends to be a difference in the types of students who opt for pre-med versus pre-nursing. For instance, we simply do not hear of pre-med students who struggle with 7th grade level dosage calculations or seek to be admitted to programs with low GPAs.
Nursing attracts its fair share of dreamers. Some of these dreamers lack the academic horsepower to work through the curriculum. I know I might receive some blowback for my thoughts, but sometimes an opposing view stings.
Advertise With Us