frequent call offs = termination = paying unemployment - page 2

So is it policy to deny unemployment to any employee who is separated from employment for any reason?

Brandon, I have found that I agree with you on at least 95% of your posts on AN. You seem like someone I would enjoy working with. But, you are confusing me on this one. I have answered this question at least twice now. What are you not getting...or better yet, what are you getting at? Lay it out. Nothing wrong with a respectful disagreement.

True enough. I probably go overboard with CAPITALIZING words for emphasis and maybe it makes me seem hostile when all I was was argumentative (I like to argue). Anyways, I still don't really get it. I really thought companies only challenged unemployment benefits if the employee did something truly grevious. But if you're following company policy, I can respect that.

I'm no expert at this but my understanding is the cost of unemployment coverage to the employer works like insurance. The more claims they have against them the more they have to pay. Someone re educate me if I'm wrong on this.