Need opinions from RN's for my Ethical Dilemma Assignment! - page 3

So far, everyone has split opinions... "Jane works in the ED part time as a tech and goes to nursing school. She was working one day when a "once in a lifetime" patient came in with an issue that... Read More

  1. Visit  GrnTea profile page
    2
    i am sorry to disagree. the criteria for what constitutes phi is very clear; a picture of a diagnostic film with none of those criteria cannot be in violation of the law. also, m&m conferences are specifically for teaching and the information shared there is for purposes of patient care. sharing it with staffers is not the same thing as sharing it with the riders on the #46 bus line.

    now, if the student shows it at clinical conference or her instructor shows it in lecture and says, "this was taken at county general on march 31 when a 45-year-old white female who worked at the blue moon cafe next door was brought in after suffering a seizure in the kitchen," that would be sharing data that could be traced back to the patient, and would violate the law, no matter what was on the screen.

    showing the (unidentified) image at lecture with general discussion of the age and clinical presentation of the patient would not be a violation of the privacy act. merely possessing the (undentified) image is not. sharing it for the purposes of education is not.
    sharpeimom and Esme12 like this.
  2. Get the hottest topics every week!

    Subscribe to our free Nursing Insights newsletter.

  3. Visit  Gal 2:20 profile page
    1
    [FONT=lucida sans unicode]ok - OP, This is an "Ethical Dilemma Assignment"??
    I can't believe I am the first person to mention this - but your instructor has ripped the "dilemma" from last year's headlines.. She/He has changed it up slightly but not enough to matter..

    Ok - no flame wars if I don't have all the details correct on this, I am going by memory..
    This incident happened at a Junior College in Overland Park, KS and made national news - it was reported in most of the Nursing journals & publications, that's why I can't believe nobody on this thread has brought it up yet. I am in a BSN program at a school right down the street from this JuCo.

    It goes something like this: During OB Clinical's, a senior in the RN program was absolutely AWEstruck upon her experience of witnessing a live birth and was especially in awe of the placenta. She asked her Clinical Instructor if she could take a picture of the placenta and her CI told her that as long as the patient consented, and the student insured that it was in compliance with HIPPA, (no PHI ) she could take a picture of the placenta.

    [FONT=lucida sans unicode]The student did take the picture, which she subsequently posted on FB. She and 3 other students were summarily kicked out of the nursing program when news of the placenta posted on a student nurses FB got around.
    [FONT=lucida sans unicode][FONT=lucida sans unicode]
    IIRC, it wasn't violation of HIPPA law that the Nursing Department used as a basis to dismiss the 4 students, but violating some part of the Nurses Code of Ethics, or one of the State boards codes.
    [FONT=lucida sans unicode][FONT=lucida sans unicode]

    [FONT=lucida sans unicode][FONT=lucida sans unicode]Well, these students were in their last semester before graduating and sitting for NCLEX. They brought a lawsuit against Johnson County Community College. The case ended going all the way up to the Supreme Court of KS, where the judge ruled in favor of the students.
    His rationale?
    [FONT=lucida sans unicode][FONT=lucida sans unicode]Well, the school was standing on the fact that the CI did not give the student permission to post the picture on FB.


    [FONT=lucida sans unicode][FONT=lucida sans unicode]The judge said that people take photos for one reason only - to share them with others. When the Instructor gave the student permission to take the picture, he/she implicitly gave permission to post it anywhere and everywhere. He ruled that the 4 students be readmitted without penalty and they were, and they graduated (I think) this past fall.
    [FONT=lucida sans unicode]
    Esme12 likes this.
  4. Visit  Esme12 profile page
    0
    It's a fine line.....I wouldn't risk it.
  5. Visit  GrnTea profile page
    1
    here's a great resource, right from the horse's mouth, the ocr. this should answer any questions that come up. have it tattooed on your arm, or maybe on the back of the ward clerk's neck, for easy reference.:d

    hipaa - frequently asked questions
    Esme12 likes this.
  6. Visit  Princess1234 profile page
    0
    M&M conferences are protected by peer review statutes.
  7. Visit  Princess1234 profile page
    0
    interesting, somewhat related story...no photos, and the patient was not identifed

    apr. 2, 2012 11:04 am et
    judge: nursing student waived free speech rights
    brett barrouquerebrett barrouquere, associated press

    [color=#556677] google
    [color=#556677] digg
    [color=#556677] del.icio.us
    [color=#556677] reddit
    [color=#556677] newsvine
    [color=#556677] mixx
    [color=#556677] facebook
    [color=#556677] yahoo

    • louisville, ky. (ap) — a former university of louisville nursing student waived her rights to free speech by signing an honor code that included a non-disclosure requirement, so she can't collect damages for being dismissed from school over a blog post, a federal judge ruled monday.
    nina yoder "had no constitutional right" to blog information about a live birth she witnessed as part of a childbearing course because of the confidentiality agreement, u.s. district judge charles r. simpson iii wrote.

    "because yoder herself agreed not to publicly disseminate the information she posted on the internet, she is not entitled to now claim that she had a constitutional right to do so," simpson wrote.

    the ruling came as part of a three-year legal battle brought by yoder, who was dismissed from school because of a blog post titled "how i witnessed the miracle of life." yoder was later reinstated and graduated. her attorney, dan canon of louisville, said she's currently working as a nurse.

    canon said yoder would appeal the ruling.

    it is definitely a surprise," canon said. "as far as i know, no court in the country has ever approved this degree of control by a university over its students' speech."

    a university spokesman did not immediately return a message seeking comment monday morning.

    yoder argued that the school retaliated against her and tried to restrict her speech because they didn't like what she had to say on the blog. the university argued that it dismissed yoder because she violated the confidentiality agreement, not in what she said specifically.

    simpson found that the confidentiality agreement allowed yoder to share information about the patients only with her instructors.

    the post named the school, but not the patient. it included a variety of comments about pregnant women and children, referring to the baby as the "creep" and describing how the expectant mother vomited.

    "at last my girl gave one big push, and immediately out came a wrinkly bluish creature, all picasso-like and weird, ugly as hell, covered in god knows what, screeching and waving its tentacles in the air," yoder wrote. "15 minutes later it turned into a cute pink itty bitty little baby girl."

    simpson found the descriptions, including the intimate detail of the labor and delivery, to be a "clear violation" of the agreement between the student and patient.

    "certainly, that was information about the mother's pregnancy and health care, and it was presented in written form on a publicly-accessible internet site, rather than 'only' to yoder's instructor," simpson wrote.

    the school dismissed yoder on march 2, 2009, saying in a letter that she violated the school's honor code by posting blog items concerning patient activities and naming the university on her my space page.

    yoder's blog posts on myspace, which date back almost a year, cover topics including suicide, religion, sex, guns and politics. she mentioned the university several times but revealed no patient names in postings filed along with the lawsuit.

    she also frequently wrote about guns and her opposition to gun-control laws and posted pictures of various weapons on the site.

    in the lawsuit, yoder said university administrators cited the gun-related postings and told her "students voiced concerns that lead us to believe you may have a gun." canon said yoder didn't have a gun at the time and has never brought a gun on campus.
    ______

  8. Visit  StudentOnTheEdge profile page
    0
    Thank you Princess1234! This lawsuit and from what I have learned about my current school have showed me that the schools believe they have too much power in our lives as students. As adults, We are free to do anything lawfully, but as students, we are back living with our parents and have to obey by their rules and can get "in trouble" for things that the normal Joe would be overlooked upon. Instead of using opportunities of error to teach us our mistakes, They throw the book at us the first second they have a chance by making each scenerio the worst it could possibly be when in turn, it was actually an amazing teaching opportunity.
    I know of a student who had gotten in trouble with his school because of a facebook post he made reguarding his opinions in an aspect of his life. Had nothing to do with school, nurses, instructors, or patients. When do schools get the line drawn for invading our lives as students? As well, another student got into a verbal disagreement during a NONNURSING RELATED SUMMER SCHOOL class while in a nursing program and got called into the Nursing directors office to get told she is being looked at for suspension due to her "actions".
    Sadly, this involvement by the schools is discouraging nursing students and ruining the precious Nursing School experience that we all crave.
    Great blog guys. I appreciate all your input in this cas!. It is very interesting and a bit controvertial as well. If you have any more court cases, Post them!
  9. Visit  nowim clean profile page
    0
    Even if it does not voilate hippa every place Ive worked has had a policy of if you are not taking care of the pt you have no reason for being in the chart. Second any time a pt has a procedure done they have to sign a consent for photos and video to be filmed so they def voilated something.
  10. Visit  juzme profile page
    1
    Quote from Esme12
    It's a fine line.....I wouldn't risk it.
    I think I am with you Esme12!!!!
    Esme12 likes this.
  11. Visit  Esme12 profile page
    0
    Quote from juzme
    I think I am with you Esme12!!!!
    and that makes you a smart cookie!


Nursing Jobs in every specialty and state. Visit today and find your dream job.

Top