Primary Nursing Care

I fully expect that RN burn out will gain momentum in the next few years due to the increased pressure felt by our nurses. Rn's continue to leave the profession, recruitment is tight and hospitals have to tighten their budgets to reflect the current economical crisis. Whilst we all acknowledge that our priority is high quality patient care, we have to question what cost? Nurses Announcements Archive Article

Updated:  

Where I used to work, 8 nurses have left in the recent months and not 1 nurse has been employed to fill in the gap. The work load has increased, expectations remain the same and the clients are getting sicker.

We all know despite the current nursing job freeze and the effects this is having on our new nursing graduates, we do face in our near and distant future a increased nursing shortage with the 'baby boomers' getting older, generations are living longer and RN's who are in their 60's and 70's working because they cannot afford to retire.

Is Primary Nursing Care being seen by some as the new way forward? If you said yes then you would be correct, there is current a new wave of thinking that we must revert to the old in order to move forward to the future. We must always think first and foremost about pt satisfaction, because financially this means pts will return to our facility time and time again, and will recommend the hospital to others, which in turn increases our revenue. In recent surveys at my hospital patients said what helped to improve their stay in hospital was lots of interaction with their RN. The least satisfied Pt's were the ones who said they hadn't seen enough of their nurse and some could not even remember the name of any RN's who had cared for them.

What happened recently in my hospital, they closed 6 beds because there were not enough nurses but then they open up 3 beds because ER was full as there were no more beds in the hospital. Did the floor get another nurse no they had to flex up. This added pressure and stress on the already overworked RN now they have 1 more pt which means 3 more daily assessments and all the work which comes with a new admission that I don't need to explain at this time.

So somebody came up with a brilliant idea to do Primary Nursing Care where all pts will be more actively involved with their RN. The aim of this is that RN's will spend 70% of their working day at the Pt's bedside, the goal increased pt satisfaction. Is this ambitious? Who can say it is early in the experiment, and RN's are going through the typical problems change brings.

It is important to stress at this time that management did not get any floor RN's on board before commencing this trial and the only documentation the RN saw was a piece of paper which stated their new role. There was however a meeting once a week for a month, and staff were encourage to attend one session this allowed the staff to hear what was happening and an opportunity to ask questions.

They are still waiting to see the patients satisfaction levels to see if this way forward was the right way to go. Sometimes I think health care management are just fumbling in the dark and are so far removed from the shop floor they are unable to think critically. Management just don't seem to comprehend what is happening, the tools they use to measure are old and antiquated and need to be revamped by asking the regular nursing staff to be more on board. Maybe primary nursing care is the way forward all I know is it didn't work in the 80's and 90's so why should it work now?

The disadvantage of involving the floor nurses is again cost. Cost of what cost of time, self, responsibility, education, the list is endless.

Baby boomers - Wikipedia

Primary nursing

Quote

Primary nursing is a method of nursing practice which emphasizes continuity of care by having one nurse (often teamed with a nursing assistant) provide complete care for a small group of inpatients within a nursing unit of a hospital. The "primary nurse" is responsible for coordinating all aspects of care for the same group of patients throughout their stay in a given area.

This is distinguished from the practice of team nursing or functional nursing by dividing duties by patient rather than by function (I.e. passing medications, doing treatments, etc.)

Specializes in med surg.

I am a charge nurse in a hospital that uses "primary nursing" meaning an RN takes 3-4 pts without a tech or LPN and they also use "team nursing" where an RN is paired with an LPN or tech and has 6 pts. Depending on how many pts we have and what the magical staffing matrix calls for dictates how much staff we have. We give the "primary" nurse the "best" pt assignment meaning the pts that can get up with minimal assist, need little PRN, etc. The problem is making sure that nurse is able to get to all the call lights. In addition we have hourly rounding where the staff is to go in to every pt room once an hour to check pain, potty, position. Thats not going great so we have not seen too much reduction in call light usage. Primary nursing can be good if its assigned correctly. Even if not assigned correctly pairing 2 nurses who can work well together with 7-8 pts can work well. It's all an theory of what is best. I think both ways can work well if people can work well together and help each other when in need.

I do think we rely on "patient satisfaction" scores way too much. My floors scores are like a rollar coaster. We have tried everything from customer service rounds, discharge call backs, manager rounds, etc. I work with a great bunch of nurses and can not understand why we vary so widely month to month. Pt's are sicker, nurses have lots of responsibilities, and life as a nurse is difficult. We may not get the blood off the sheet "stat" but we gave the pt with a hgb of 5 the life saving blood they needed "stat." Whats more important?:redbeathe

Specializes in MedSurg/Geropsych so far.
I am a charge nurse in a hospital that uses "primary nursing" meaning an RN takes 3-4 pts without a tech or LPN and they also use "team nursing" where an RN is paired with an LPN or tech and has 6 pts.

Ok, where do you work and how do I get an application? (Joking) But seriously, you work at a great place if it works that well. I work at a facility where the RN get 6,7 or more patients (had 8 last night, 1 went swingbed so discharge and admit, and a new admit to make 9), has no basis on acuity, with usually an LPN giving PO meds/Accu checks and hopefully hanging an IVPB if you are lucky, and an aide that will only change people if she has nurse to help her and that cannot be trusted to do rounds to make sure patients are clean, dry, etc. So, yeah, the RN is ultimately responsible for 8 or 9 patients and everything that has to be done to them sometimes alone. As you can tell, our new RN turnover rate is very quickly, only the ones that have been there for years and get jaded and act like they don't care are the ones that hang on.

Specializes in OB, HH, ADMIN, IC, ED, QI.

I think it would ease hospital nurses' workload, and create job opportunities, if Utilization Managers/Coordinators became Hospitalization Prevention Coordinators. They could liaison with physicians, as health insurance companies do, to determine which patients are most likely to be admitted (using statistical resources), then call up those patients and find out what comes between them and getting well ......... better........compliant........ staying at home instead of going into the hospital or the closest chocolate cake.

They could also be in the ED and on units, to see what instructions actually are understood (if read) by discharged patients, if prescriptions actually are given to them, and if they get at least one dose of it before leaving. I left the ED at 11:30 P.M. in southern CA this month, after one dose of an anti-hypertensive worked, and drove 5 hours (with the full knowledge and consent of the nurse and physician assigned to me), arriving home in the Central Coast (Santa Cruz County)without stopping, 5 hours later. The next night I was driving on a dark road in the rain when, unconscious, I jumped a curb in my car.... Luckily I hadn't had a CVA.

Also Discharge Planners need to be scheduled to work around the clock in the Urgent Care clinics/ED; and plan realistically for after care (not just getting patients a place to go and transportation to get there). There is absolutely no time for staff in that department, to visualize what should, could, would happen to patients after they leave the hospital or Urgent Care.

The floor I work at does primary nursing and we always have. To save money management is actually switching us to team nursing.... We have lost three nurses already and are expecting more people to quit in the future. Right now we have 4/5 patients at night and 0 (usually)-2 (if we are lucky) CNA's during a shift.

What they plan on doing is raising our patient ration so we will have 5-6 patients at night, but always 2 CNA's to help us. The idea is CNAs cost less than RN's and if they do more of the basic care (assist to bathroom, clean up, vitals, empty drains, change beds etc..) RN's will have more time for "nursing care" Education, medication, procedures and interventions.

I am waiting to see how it all pans out before I decide to stay or leave. So I kind of understand your situation, but in reverse. We also have not hired new people to fill the gaps and we have not yet switched to team nursing or hired new CNA's, which means we are short one nurse often.

Specializes in Med nurse in med-surg., float, HH, and PDN.

Somewhere in another posting I have made my comment on primary nursing: I have read the original textbook on it, and most places have totally "tweaked" the whole theory so that it no longer resembles the original idea. Of course, the 25-30 years since I read the book have completely changed the face, guts, and , um, "outcome" of staffing theories for hospitals and nursing facilities. I'm wondering what's next, but hope to be out of the main-stream when the next great idea comes on the scene.

wonderful insight

good read.