Nursing Shortage

Nurses General Nursing

Published

"The nursing shortage lies--local major hospital corporations are not hiring nurses, despite continuing to falsely post job openings"

Knoxville, Tennessee

December 1, 2013

After deciding to go to school to become a Registered Nurse, many had the hopes and promises of never being unemployed or ever having to worry about finding a job. So many figured this would be a good investment in their future--but it may be time to reconsider that idea.

For as long as I can remember, and most definitely for as long as I had aspired to be a nurse, I had been hearing the term 'nursing shortage' tossed around by the multiple media streams as well as from other healthcare professionals. It was brought up everywhere. If you looked for example, in the newspaper, you would find ads boasting huge sign on bonuses for Registered Nurses with excellent wages and benefits-- some even paid continuing education opportunities.

Many people began to jump on the bandwagon to obtaining their nursing degrees. With many opting to do BSN programs, there were also many ADN programs that offered nursing education and the 'RN' title after only 2 years of study. This made it appealing to a lot of already employed individuals looking for a stable, steady career change. All kinds of nursing programs began to spring up, with as many as 6-10 nursing programs per city or region. Most of these programs here in Knoxville are producing roughly 60-100 nurses every 2 or 4 years depending on the program, but with a job outlook growth projected at "faster than average" and the "shortage of nurses", it seems like a no brainer! With quotes like this plastered all over the American Nurse's Association's website, where could you possibly go wrong?

The Shortage Isn't Stopping Soon
You've likely heard about the "nursing shortage" for years now, and perhaps you think it's been resolved. However, registered nurses are still at the top of the list when it comes to employment growth (BLS, 2010).

What we have failed to see as a society is the impact of market saturation. With so many local nursing programs producing a steady supply of new graduates, it's not difficult to see that eventually the supply is going to exceed demand in any given geographical region, as it has already done here in Knoxville. But this isn't the only contributing factor in and of itself. This is just one of the complicating factors in a multiple faceted, bigger issue.

At the same time we saw such an increase in the amount of nurses that were being turned out into the job market, we also began to see some political changes within the healthcare industry itself, in particularly with the hospitals. Many of the smaller market hospitals began to merge or be 'bought out' by larger corporations, such as Covenant Health and Tennova Healthcare Systems. These larger corporations have ended up owning many smaller hospitals and dominate the job market in the Knoxville area. This is a great investment for the corporations, but can be pure disaster for the nurse seeking employment.

If those two strikes aren't enough to put nurses behind the eight ball, then add in the fact that many jobs that used to be held only by Registered Nurses are now being filled by Licensed Practical Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, and Medical Assistants. This is in part due to an increase in the availability of educational programs for these careers. Also, the job descriptions have changed which allow these individuals to do more than the previously could, thus eliminating the need for RN's. This also eliminates the need for a company to pay RN wages for the same tasks that can be done by a CNA or LPN.

This leads to another problem that is wreaking havoc on nursing job opportunities--the greediness of these large corporations. The idea of "doing more with less" has caught on BIG with employers. In jobs, such as retail, this only hurts the employee by working them to a personal limit and exhaustion. In the employer's eye, if they can get one person to do the work of three people, then why would they want to pay three people? This idea has really taken a hold on the nursing industry as well. The employers however, have neglected to see the real problem with this. When you implement this ideology, not only do you work the employee beyond his or her limits, but you also endanger the lives of patients. I have found this to be the case first hand, working for Covenant Health. This is especially true on medical surgical units and critical care units. It is not uncommon for one nurse to carry the load of 7-8 patients per shift on a medical surgical unit and 3 patients at a time in a critical care unit. This patient to nurse ratio has increase drastically over the past few years and is simply unsafe practice. I can remember having traveling nurses come to our facility, see our nurse to patient ratio and make comments about how 'unsafe" they felt working with that load. The employers are slowly increasing the workload per person until they find a "breaking point", which usually consists of a patient harm event and/or a subsequent lawsuit involving patient harm. Unfortunately, patients must be injured or harmed before the issue is viewed in any other light aside from a "bottom line" or "money" issue. Despite bringing these issues up in staff development meeting numerous times, it was always "blown off" as not important. These large corporations are able to get away with such treatment of their employees because of the very thing they are creating--the saturation of nurses and the fact that they dominate the market. If you have nurses that are seeking jobs so desperately, then they are willing to "put up" with harsher working conditions and lower wages in spite of having a "job". At the same time, the reason for those harsher working conditions is greediness from the employers by not hiring additional nurses to spread the workload out and make conditions safer for everyone. It's a vicious cycle and until the healthcare corporations such as Covenant and Tennova realize this, they may be facing more patient dissatisfaction and lawsuits than they bargained for.

Interestingly enough, employers do a great job of "masking" the fact that they aren't hiring new nurses too. Just go to any large hospital website and view the job opening boards. You would be amazed at the amount of "open" positions that are posted there. I have heard from numerous nurses, that even after applying for upwards of 30 positions, they have yet to receive one call for an interview. I have experienced the same thing first hand. After speaking with one local Human Resources agent, it was apparent that their facility had only hired five RN's over the past 5 months, despite countless pages of open job postings. I have spoken with several managers who have informed me that hiring is just 'dead' and there are no plans to hire additional nurses, especially before the beginning of the year at the earliest. In addition, you never see those attractive 'sign on' bonuses that once were a commonplace among nursing positions.

If these large hospital corporations are not going to hire new nurses, and we have in fact seen the end of the 'nursing shortage era", then they at least need to stop feeding the public a constant stream of lies by continuing to post job openings daily. This is a very misleading and dirty way to do business in the community.

Specializes in HH, Peds, Rehab, Clinical.

Nope, sorry. It's hard to engage in a lively, intellectual discussion with a professional peer who doesn't grasp basic grammatical concepts. Since verbal debate is impossible in such a forum, the written dialogue is all we're left with. Your continued use of quotes in an improper manner leads one to believe that the words you write are not your own.

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/577/01/ From this article I pull the following: The primary function of quotation marks is to set off and represent exact language (either spoken or written) that has come from somebody else. The quotation mark is also used to designate speech acts in fiction and sometimes poetry. And: Indirect quotations are not exact wordings but rather rephrasings or summaries of another person's words. In this case, it is not necessary to use quotation marks

Again, the quotation mark is to be used when the written word is someone else's or a rephrasing of another's words. I do love a meaningful, enlightening discussion with other nursing professionals, but are we chatting with you or you using another's ideas and words?

Specializes in HH, Peds, Rehab, Clinical.

And now that borders on creepy and stalker-ish!!

By the way, I happened to read some of your threads and it seems like you have a thing for this when you write -------

What's up with all the -dashes- in your posts? :)

Specializes in Med/surg, Quality & Risk.
Why is RN written as "RN" when referring to ADN graduates?!

Why wouldn't it?

Specializes in Med/surg, Quality & Risk.
Zack, what is the purpose of the frequent use of your "quotes". Please, man, brush up on some basic writing skills!!

This is amusing because many of the replies to this post I just read has at least one word or phrase in "quotes," no matter the writer. I guess you might just have to "get over it."

This thread has been officially cleared for popcorn. Appropriate amounts of salt and butter are authorized for use. Ladies and gentlemen, start your microwaves.

And now that borders on creepy and stalker-ish!!

I can't find anywhere in the grammatical rules that you should be using dashes every other word either, but you do it. So, until you become the perfect grammatical genius, you can just get off my back buddy! If its difficult for you to read, then just don't read it…plain and simple. Nobody is forcing you to read anything.

And since when did reading other people's posts become stalker-ish and creepy? I guess everyone on this site qualifies in that case. HAHA!

I can't find anywhere in the grammatical rules that you should be using dashes every other word either, but you do it. So, until you become the perfect grammatical genius, you can just get off my back buddy!

Well, now, that's an exaggeration. I was curious, so I looked. It would appear to me that Bucky uses "--" within the confines that are considered appropriate for the written English language.

Here is a direct copy and paste of one of BuckyBadgerRN's posts:

by BuckyBadgerRN May 1

I was chatting with a friend who is an RN in Canada (I'm NOT playing the RN card as opposed to just saying nurse---I don't think Canada has LPN's--I could be wrong--and don't want to offend anyone!) and she was saying that the yearly cost of her license is going up by $100 to $566---per year!

It made me curious as to what the "going rate" is around the US for license renewal?

In WI it's $88 (I think!) for a 2 year licensure--how about where you practice?

So, it's grammatically correct to use 3 dashes to separate statements? Not to mention that (I think!)

Here is a direct copy and paste of one of BuckyBadgerRN's posts:

by BuckyBadgerRN May 1

I was chatting with a friend who is an RN in Canada (I'm NOT playing the RN card as opposed to just saying nurse---I don't think Canada has LPN's--I could be wrong--and don't want to offend anyone!) and she was saying that the yearly cost of her license is going up by $100 to $566---per year!

It made me curious as to what the "going rate" is around the US for license renewal?

In WI it's $88 (I think!) for a 2 year licensure--how about where you practice?

So, it's grammatically correct to use 3 dashes to desperate statements? Not to mention that (I think!)

Yeah, you pulled up one post--from May. I figured if it was that big of a deal, it'd show up on the first page or two of posts in the history.

No one's perfect. My point was that in general, Bucky seems to use dashes correctly.

I think you mean "separate".

SoilderNurse22, who do you think you are? Of course no one is perfect, especially once I prove it to you by showing you proof. If you can't say anything nice, it's best to just keep your comments to yourself!

Just because you value good grammar on a forum (where the conversation is, by the very nature of the medium, written) doesn't mean one should abandon ship and become an English teacher.

Specializes in Critical Care, ED, Cath lab, CTPAC,Trauma.
So the issue really isn't an end to the nursing shortage, which I think we can all agree is probably true given the nurse/patient ratio. In fact, that points to the fact that there is a "shortage" of nurses in medical facilities. The real problem is corporate greed and an unwillingness to hire more nurses for all the reasons you mention in your post.

Further, I'm sure its true that hospitals/corporations are not hiring at the level advertised, but just because one has applied to 30+ jobs doesn't mean they will just get one because there is a "shortage" of nurses. Perhaps that individual isn't what they are looking for for whatever reason. Its just like with any other profession, a position might stay open for months on end because they haven't found who they are looking for even if one feels that they are a strong, qualified candidate. They can afford to pick and choose, and so they do.

The nursing "shortage" was based on numbers that were inflated based on the "Mandatory Staffing ratios" that were going to sweep the country! Like it passed in California. It never happened. Any legislation for staffing ratios went out with the stock market crash in 2008. As the baby boomers were supposed to retire couldn't because they lost their retirement funds and 401K when the market crash...only the bankers got bailed out....not the little guy. Their spouses were laid off jobs were not available they had kids in college so they continue to work. The baby boomers that I know are going to work until they drop dead because they can not afford to retire...all their 401K's are decimated and they will never recoup the loss for their employer contributions are just plain gone....forever.

There was never really a "shortage".

However, we will eventually have no choice but retire or die. Nursing is cyclical...I believe that there will be a need once again but the gravy days are long gone.

+ Add a Comment