Million Nurse March Information

Nurses General Nursing

Published

Information about the Million Nurse March

Board of Directors

Michele Jansen RN Florida

Helen Cook RN Michigan

Cheryl Worden LPN Arkansas

Ron Phelps RN BSN Virginia

The MNM came into being as a discussion on a nursing website. That discussion than became a growing idea. Eventually that idea became an organization. We are now a growing organization of nurses from varied and diverse backgrounds and educations. It is the thought of this organization that massive changes in nursing and in how healthcare is delivered must be made. It is up to nurses to prompt those changes. Nurses are the true patient advocates, and in order to do so we must advocate for ourselves. To do this effectively the thought is to bring all nurses together. Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nurse Assistants. Each one of us makes up the important bedside team, and without us healthcare would not exist. We believe that each component of the bedside team have practice acts and certification limits that must be followed to enhance appropriate patient care, and that it is inappropriate for administrators that are not licensed bedside caregivers to put any of us into positions that demand otherwise.

It is the vision of the Million Nurse March that the diverse voices within the field need to come together under one banner, with common ground. The MNM is the vehicle in which that can occur. We invite all organizations that have nurses within their membership to pool resources together to make this vision a reality.

We invite all others that are concerned about patient care and the state of healthcare to join with us. Other healthcare workers, advocacy groups, physicians, educators and public citizens. All who are concerned and feel that they can endorse and support the tenets of this organization are welcome to participate. We offer the caveat that our platform is a nursing advocacy platform that will also enhance patient care and other individual agendas cannot come in front of that.

Our platform is for federal legislation on these specific issues

1.Nationwide staff to patient ratios based on patient acuity; in every area that nursing care is provided. Hospitals, nursing homes, clinics etc...

2.National legislation that prohibits the use of mandatory overtime that will protect all bedside caregivers.

3.National legislation that will put enforceable and strong whistleblower protections into place for all healthcare workers.

4.National legislation that will prohibit the performance of skilled nursing functions by unlicensed staff.

5.Restrictions on unsafe floating practices.

6.Appropriate monetary compensation for skills and science based knowledge.

Without which patient care suffers.

This platform addresses the working conditions that are poorly impacting all nursing care across the country. It is the working conditions that have prompted the mass exodus of nurses from the bedside. This platform addresses retention issues.

The other side of the platform must address recruitment issues. As a profession we must bury the negativity that has run rampant through our ranks. Encourage young persons to pursue entry level nursing programs, support increased funding for those that pursue nursing programs as well as increased funding and other support programs that will allow those that wish to pursue the higher education opportunities of the field.

We need to value, respect and celebrate those that work strictly at the bedside. We need to encourage the healthcare industry to acknowledge that bedside nursing care is the bedrock on which healthcare rests, on which good patients outcomes are impossible without. We need to educate the public regarding what nurses do and how we affect the outcomes of every patient we come in contact with. We also have to acknowledge and effectively deal with the dynamics that encourage and perpetuate the mentality of "eating our young" be that the new graduate, or the experienced nurse that is new to a different field of practice. We must quit setting fires in our own house.

The MNM has set aside two days in which to address our issues to our national legislators. May 10, 2002 for meeting with legislators that are willing to sit down and listen to our concerns, and May 11, 2002 for a March and rally to protest the treatment of nurses by the healthcare industry, highlighting how that treatment has directly impacted and exacerbated the nursing shortage. This time will also be used to educate the public and media as to what nurses do day after day, how what we do has a direct effect on patient care outcomes and to celebrate our profession for the joys it can give us as well as the care and compassion it can give others.

Please join us in this worthwhile endeavor. Working together we will have a tremendous impact on our lives and the care of our patients.

[email protected]

I read through these posts and I think that all of you are doing the same thing....

Finding one piece of information to use against an entire idea. It is no different to crucify those who believe in the MNM for their ideals than to crucify the ANA for not doing enough. I would bet the ideals and purpose of the ANA are similar to those of the MNM, and both are right. I think membership in the ANA is something that we should all do, because it will give the ANA the power and voice that it needs to make changes. The ANA is attempting changes for advanced practice because I would bet that they are the people that join, it makes sense. The MNM is attempting changes for bedside nurses, because we (I am a bedside diploma rn), don't join our National Organization. Eventually, MNM will be a national organization, and I dare say it, you may need dues, and you will attempt change focusing on the desires of your members. The infighting among people with different ideas should be expected, it is how new and better ideas are formed. The personal attacks and insults could be left out though, I think you discredit yourself when you make personal insults, I also think the excuse of cost to join a professioanl organization is played out. If a change is going to happen ever, it will cost us. To march will cost people something as well. I believe in both organizations, I come to this site whenever I can, I get great information, I copy alot of the articles and bring them to work and hang them on our bulletin boards. I will March, and I will continue to believe that membership in a professional organization by all in our profession will create change. I actually think that eventually we will have a meeting of the minds in our profession and change will happen, possibly by all of us being in the same organization, maybe it will be called Million Nurses Association. You know what they say "a rose by any other name...".

I read through these posts and I think that all of you are doing the same thing....

Finding one piece of information to use against an entire idea. It is no different to crucify those who believe in the MNM for their ideals than to crucify the ANA for not doing enough. I would bet the ideals and purpose of the ANA are similar to those of the MNM, and both are right. I think membership in the ANA is something that we should all do, because it will give the ANA the power and voice that it needs to make changes. The ANA is attempting changes for advanced practice because I would bet that they are the people that join, it makes sense. The MNM is attempting changes for bedside nurses, because we (I am a bedside diploma rn), don't join our National Organization. Eventually, MNM will be a national organization, and I dare say it, you may need dues, and you will attempt change focusing on the desires of your members. The infighting among people with different ideas should be expected, it is how new and better ideas are formed. The personal attacks and insults could be left out though, I think you discredit yourself when you make personal insults, I also think the excuse of cost to join a professioanl organization is played out. If a change is going to happen ever, it will cost us. To march will cost people something as well. I believe in both organizations, I come to this site whenever I can, I get great information, I copy alot of the articles and bring them to work and hang them on our bulletin boards. I will March, and I will continue to believe that membership in a professional organization by all in our profession will create change. I actually think that eventually we will have a meeting of the minds in our profession and change will happen, possibly by all of us being in the same organization, maybe it will be called Million Nurses Association. You know what they say "a rose by any other name...".

wildtime and rncountry-Post your critiques on ANA, but the least you could do is inform yourselves with some up-to-date information re: an association of which neither of you is a member.

Again I suggest you revisit the site. Here's a start.

http://www.nursingworld.org/member2.htm#safety

wildtime and rncountry-Post your critiques on ANA, but the least you could do is inform yourselves with some up-to-date information re: an association of which neither of you is a member.

Again I suggest you revisit the site. Here's a start.

http://www.nursingworld.org/member2.htm#safety

Thank you Charles for putting things into perspective. Yes, let us look towards the future and create each day.

El, you gave me something to think about and I always appreciate that.

Thank you Charles for putting things into perspective. Yes, let us look towards the future and create each day.

El, you gave me something to think about and I always appreciate that.

A word of caution to posters to prevent some misunderstandings...Each organization has its seperate mission, vision, goals and philosophy. Each targets a different audience. For example, the AACN is a clinical nursing specialty organization with no political agenda in its organizational charter. Sigma Theta Tau International is an educational organization with charter materials specific to its goals. ANA is a political organization by charter and is sanctioned by the federal government to conduct lobbying on the behalf of nurses. There are many other examples. Be careful to compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges. Choose the organization(s) that best fits your needs. The ideal is clearly to maintain membership in your clinical specialty, political and educational organizations.

regards

chas

A word of caution to posters to prevent some misunderstandings...Each organization has its seperate mission, vision, goals and philosophy. Each targets a different audience. For example, the AACN is a clinical nursing specialty organization with no political agenda in its organizational charter. Sigma Theta Tau International is an educational organization with charter materials specific to its goals. ANA is a political organization by charter and is sanctioned by the federal government to conduct lobbying on the behalf of nurses. There are many other examples. Be careful to compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges. Choose the organization(s) that best fits your needs. The ideal is clearly to maintain membership in your clinical specialty, political and educational organizations.

regards

chas

Originally posted by wildtime88:

i admit that ANA has a new face....

i applaud them for the efforts that they are putting forth ...i do not agree with a few of the stances that they have taken on some issues. but that would be normal to say of any political party. i do not really believe that political ideaology has a place in an associations that are dedicated to helping it's members .....i ma going to continue to watch and actually listen and research to see if the ANA is asking it's members what they want to have addressed. also i am going to observe it is more importantly what the majority of the members want.

so did you take part in the nationwide survey the ANA did this year where it asked those questions of direct-care RNs all over the country - members AND non-members? I posted the link to that survey here a few times. Any RN could have made their voice heard in it. The results of that survey from thousands of RNs were broadcasted by 100 news stations the day after they were released & the results of that survey were utilized in the packed U.S. Senate Hearing on the Nurses Shortage last month.

Thousands of RNs nationwide, members as well as non-members, said staffing, mandatory OT, lack of respect, dismal working conditions & financial compensation were the issues & thats what the ANA brought to the hearing. (The Senator's statements & the testimonies are posted here somwhere.) We will have input into legislation that comes from that hearing - and it will be legislation that not only helps us members but helps all nurses nationwide.

So if, as you say, politics has no place in this struggle, and the MNM event has no place in this struggle, what exactly do you suggest does?? You keep saying: "i for one am not going to hop in my car and go to washington to beg and plead for something that as a group we can accomplish on our own." But we're still waiting for you to tell us HOW you would have us accomplish it all on our own.

The fact that a United States Senate Hearing was convened because of what WE have been saying & doing in our struggle to save us & our profession speaks volumes. It seems to me that we are well on our way to some real solutions because WE are out there making them pay attention & WE are demanding those solutions but you seem to be discounting this.

What other suggestions do you have?

I agree we have the numbers to move mountains - if RNs would just get up & push -RNs going to Washington DC to testify before Congress in order to get some resoultion to our issues - and Congress not only listening but acting on that & working with us to reach a resolution is a major accomplishment but since you dont we should be in Washington DC & you dont think our efforts now are effective, I'd like to hear your ideas on HOW you think we should proceed.

Give us at least one suggestion.

thanks

Originally posted by wildtime88:

i admit that ANA has a new face....

i applaud them for the efforts that they are putting forth ...i do not agree with a few of the stances that they have taken on some issues. but that would be normal to say of any political party. i do not really believe that political ideaology has a place in an associations that are dedicated to helping it's members .....i ma going to continue to watch and actually listen and research to see if the ANA is asking it's members what they want to have addressed. also i am going to observe it is more importantly what the majority of the members want.

so did you take part in the nationwide survey the ANA did this year where it asked those questions of direct-care RNs all over the country - members AND non-members? I posted the link to that survey here a few times. Any RN could have made their voice heard in it. The results of that survey from thousands of RNs were broadcasted by 100 news stations the day after they were released & the results of that survey were utilized in the packed U.S. Senate Hearing on the Nurses Shortage last month.

Thousands of RNs nationwide, members as well as non-members, said staffing, mandatory OT, lack of respect, dismal working conditions & financial compensation were the issues & thats what the ANA brought to the hearing. (The Senator's statements & the testimonies are posted here somwhere.) We will have input into legislation that comes from that hearing - and it will be legislation that not only helps us members but helps all nurses nationwide.

So if, as you say, politics has no place in this struggle, and the MNM event has no place in this struggle, what exactly do you suggest does?? You keep saying: "i for one am not going to hop in my car and go to washington to beg and plead for something that as a group we can accomplish on our own." But we're still waiting for you to tell us HOW you would have us accomplish it all on our own.

The fact that a United States Senate Hearing was convened because of what WE have been saying & doing in our struggle to save us & our profession speaks volumes. It seems to me that we are well on our way to some real solutions because WE are out there making them pay attention & WE are demanding those solutions but you seem to be discounting this.

What other suggestions do you have?

I agree we have the numbers to move mountains - if RNs would just get up & push -RNs going to Washington DC to testify before Congress in order to get some resoultion to our issues - and Congress not only listening but acting on that & working with us to reach a resolution is a major accomplishment but since you dont we should be in Washington DC & you dont think our efforts now are effective, I'd like to hear your ideas on HOW you think we should proceed.

Give us at least one suggestion.

thanks

I, too, would like to hear one suggestion as to what nurses should do. I get the news updates from the ANA(contrary to popular belief I do not despise them, I just do not agree with everything) I participated in the survey because what nurses have to say needs to be heard! The survey was for all nurses not just ANA members and the results showed exactly what gets discussed on this board. Yes, it is my thought that nurses rallying together can make a difference. To say that demonstrations cannot negates a history in this country full of ones that did. The labor law changes in the early 1900's did not happen because somebody up in Washington thought of it, they happened because of massive unrest and in some cases because of individuals that stood up against large companies risking literally, life and limb. Child labor laws came out of that and as a side benefit we began to look at children as something other than miniture adults. Womans sufferage came out of activism, so did civil rights, again with people willing to risk life and limb for it. Major social change has often taken place because of protests, activism and yes gathering in Washington. Can you honestly tell me that the major protests that took place in the late 60's and early 70's had no impact on the social structure of this country? Regardless of whether you believe the changes were good or bad, changes occured and occured rapidly. Baby Boomers have had a huge impact on this country and when they are at the point that nursing care is something they will need they will also impact the healthcare community and we had better be prepared. Ideas of how to handle a crisis that only promises to get worse are welcome. There are many intelligent, talented people in all the various organizations for nursing, I simply cannot help but wonder what would happen if we tapped into that talent as a collective representation of nursing? To take the best that each has to offer and run with it. All we have to do is to look at what has been successfully been done by different organizations and put the pieces of each part together. By doing this on a national level we could have the ability to affect nursing and healthcare delivery everywhere. As jt has pointed out the NYSNA has had many successes, there are things going on in Oregon that would prove useful on a national scale, much of the platform that you see for the MNM is taken directly from legislation that has passed in California. As a national group the ANA has a structure in place and the ability to lobby, they have done a great deal to overcome issues and perceptions in the past. If we look to the good that each of our organizations have done and utilize them towards even greater good we have the ability to do something that has never been done before. At least not by nursing. The issues that are facing nursing in this country are not only here, they are global. I have corresponded with nurses in Canada, England, New Zealand and Australia. (Love the internet) smile.gif While their systems of healthcare are different than ours in structure the issues that we are dealing with are the same issues that they are dealing with. The infighting we see here is not indiginous to us. I can't help but think we have an opportunity to make an impact not only in this country, but a model for others to follow. What that takes is working together for common goals. Difficult yes, but also doable.

I would be interested in hearing ideas from you wildtime, because while you note many problems I don't see solutions. I do not believe that any one group has all the answers, that includes the MNM. But think what we could do if the answers that have proven successful in various areas of the country where brought together under one banner what we could accomplish! Your input is welcome.

I, too, would like to hear one suggestion as to what nurses should do. I get the news updates from the ANA(contrary to popular belief I do not despise them, I just do not agree with everything) I participated in the survey because what nurses have to say needs to be heard! The survey was for all nurses not just ANA members and the results showed exactly what gets discussed on this board. Yes, it is my thought that nurses rallying together can make a difference. To say that demonstrations cannot negates a history in this country full of ones that did. The labor law changes in the early 1900's did not happen because somebody up in Washington thought of it, they happened because of massive unrest and in some cases because of individuals that stood up against large companies risking literally, life and limb. Child labor laws came out of that and as a side benefit we began to look at children as something other than miniture adults. Womans sufferage came out of activism, so did civil rights, again with people willing to risk life and limb for it. Major social change has often taken place because of protests, activism and yes gathering in Washington. Can you honestly tell me that the major protests that took place in the late 60's and early 70's had no impact on the social structure of this country? Regardless of whether you believe the changes were good or bad, changes occured and occured rapidly. Baby Boomers have had a huge impact on this country and when they are at the point that nursing care is something they will need they will also impact the healthcare community and we had better be prepared. Ideas of how to handle a crisis that only promises to get worse are welcome. There are many intelligent, talented people in all the various organizations for nursing, I simply cannot help but wonder what would happen if we tapped into that talent as a collective representation of nursing? To take the best that each has to offer and run with it. All we have to do is to look at what has been successfully been done by different organizations and put the pieces of each part together. By doing this on a national level we could have the ability to affect nursing and healthcare delivery everywhere. As jt has pointed out the NYSNA has had many successes, there are things going on in Oregon that would prove useful on a national scale, much of the platform that you see for the MNM is taken directly from legislation that has passed in California. As a national group the ANA has a structure in place and the ability to lobby, they have done a great deal to overcome issues and perceptions in the past. If we look to the good that each of our organizations have done and utilize them towards even greater good we have the ability to do something that has never been done before. At least not by nursing. The issues that are facing nursing in this country are not only here, they are global. I have corresponded with nurses in Canada, England, New Zealand and Australia. (Love the internet) smile.gif While their systems of healthcare are different than ours in structure the issues that we are dealing with are the same issues that they are dealing with. The infighting we see here is not indiginous to us. I can't help but think we have an opportunity to make an impact not only in this country, but a model for others to follow. What that takes is working together for common goals. Difficult yes, but also doable.

I would be interested in hearing ideas from you wildtime, because while you note many problems I don't see solutions. I do not believe that any one group has all the answers, that includes the MNM. But think what we could do if the answers that have proven successful in various areas of the country where brought together under one banner what we could accomplish! Your input is welcome.

+ Add a Comment