Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Emergency Nursing /

Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,434 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
Page 3 of 7 < 12 3 4567 >

No. 20
from nuangel1
Old Dec 05, 2007, 03:26 PM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
in my ed only the drs clear the pt form board and collar .its in the drs scope of practice not mine as a nurse.
Top

2 Readers Gave Kudos
 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
No. 21
from ZippyGBR
Old Dec 05, 2007, 04:07 PM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by the big nurse View Post
The place I am currently working takes their patients off the back bard before the doctors clear the pt. Dose anyone know or heard of this practice anywhere and what studies have done to backed this practice up.
thanks
assuming the restrictive and prescriptive way in which the US works in generla doesn't get in the way ( thank chosen deity for the attitude in the UK where it;s the training , education and competencies that decide on what peopel do rather than what their name badge says...) - why not assuming the patient meets accepted and documented criteria for not being immobilised

the physical examination skills required to decide that someone does not need immobilisation are those which any decent ED RN should already have - because you should be using them in triage to differentiate whipcash, from whiplash from a potnetial bony spinal injury... canadian C-spine rules seem ot be a common basis for decision algorithms in the Uk including a pre-hospital one ( in the JRCALC national ambulance guidelines) that can be used by Qualified Ambulance Technicians as well as Registered Paramedica
Top
 
No. 22
from ZippyGBR
Old Dec 05, 2007, 04:10 PM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by mianders View Post
I worked in the ER for years and would never take a patient off a backboard without a doctor's order. You can not maintain spinal immobilization with just a c-collar. If you have TNCC you know that the head needs to be taped to the board to completely immobilize the c-spine. You can not trust the patient to hold there head in a neutral position. In fact our computerized charting asks which physician gave the order. It only takes one c-spine fx to make you lose your license.
as a TNCC provider ( and a PHTLS provider FWIW) that's not quite the truth is it...

a collar alone does not provide C spine immobilisation

a collar and manual immobilsation

OR

a collar and properly 'fitted' head blocks/ sandbags and tape

does

the board is irrelevant in the ED
Top
 
No. 23
from ZippyGBR
Old Dec 05, 2007, 04:15 PM
Updated Dec 05, 2007 at 04:16 PM by ZippyGBR

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by RN1980 View Post
they'll stay on the board until hell freeze over or until er doc or neuro/ortho doc tells me to take'em off.
at which point you've broguht them a potentially fatal condition or at the very least a much prolonged stay in hospital which we heal and/or surgically repeair th iatrogenic pressure ulcers

litsen if a patient is brought in the er on spinal percautions by ems that right there has set the standard of care for that patient until the patient is medically cleared by a doc it is prudent that you keep that patient on the percautions and i tell you that you would be very liable if you took it upon yourself to remove the percautions "even if you did a through assessment of the patient" and turned out the pt had fx,strain or nerve damage that could've been aggrevated by you removing them from the board or d/c'ing the c-collar.
why bother going to univerisity for 4 years if all you do is wait for orders from the big clever doctors...


hey if ems thinks it's a good idea to put the patient on a board to begin with i'm sure as heck not going to remove it until cleared by the doc, and i'd advise you to do the same.

given that the US lets people with 110 hours of cookbook protocol following training ride on emergency ambulances ... we have better trained first aiders in rightpondia than that...

if you were an inexperienced Dutch RN then maybe ( dutch paramedics are all Nurse Practitioners)
Top
 
No. 24
Old Dec 05, 2007, 09:07 PM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Ok, but my question is.....

So if you keep the patient on the spinal board until the doctor assesses, and the patient is found to have a fracture.......they don't go back onto the spinal board do they? Do they go back onto the hospital stretcher with c-collar on? So the board is coming off anyways right? Only meant for transport?

I understand what you're all saying about not wanting to remove the board on your own b/c what if the pt got a fracture during your non-doctor roll. But, when you do roll, a doctor doesn't routinely take the head do they? The nurses are still the ones doing the roll, with the doctor palpating the spine right??
Top
 
No. 25
from RN1980
Old Dec 06, 2007, 08:38 AM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by ZippyGBR View Post
at which point you've broguht them a potentially fatal condition or at the very least a much prolonged stay in hospital which we heal and/or surgically repeair th iatrogenic pressure ulcers



why bother going to univerisity for 4 years if all you do is wait for orders from the big clever doctors...
well gosh darn... i guess that little 2yr community college i went to would be frowned upon there in england... nope no big fancy 4 yr university for poor ole country boy me. just shows that i don't need 4yrs of nursing school to keep my but from being sued.




given that the US lets people with 110 hours of cookbook protocol following training ride on emergency ambulances ... we have better trained first aiders in rightpondia than that...

if you were an inexperienced Dutch RN then maybe ( dutch paramedics are all Nurse Practitioners)
now i guess thats a slander on our ems system here in poor ole mississippi...gosh darn..heck it's a wonder that folks survive down here. in the real world i'm not a dutch rn...and i don't know nothing of 110hrs of protocols, i'm a asn degree icu/er rn with ccrn and studying for cen..1lt in army nurse in ms nat. guard, thats right 2yr nsg degree..i guess here in mississippi they figure we can learn in 2 yrs what it takes ya'll 4 yrs to learn. and futhermore our hospitals have indoor plumbming in mississippi..
Top
 
No. 26
from ZippyGBR
Old Dec 06, 2007, 08:55 AM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by RN1980 View Post
now i guess thats a slander on our ems system here in poor ole mississippi...gosh darn..heck it's a wonder that folks survive down here. in the real world i'm not a dutch rn...and i don't know nothing of 110hrs of protocols, i'm a asn degree icu/er rn with ccrn and studying for cen..1lt in army nurse in ms nat. guard, thats right 2yr nsg degree..i guess here in mississippi they figure we can learn in 2 yrs what it takes ya'll 4 yrs to learn. and futhermore our hospitals have indoor plumbming in mississippi..
point being - a reply in the thread said ' if EMS have immobilised then they ought to stay immobilised until cleared by adoctor'

if the USAn EMS system wasn't based around a significant number of Emergency Ambulance providers having as little as 110 hours of training ( look as the USDOT minimum curriculum for EMT-BASIC) then that sentiment might hold true

e.g. where Paramedics are health professionals or even to the extreme that the Dutch and Scandinavian systems have where to access 'Paramedic' Training you are required to be an RN with post basic emergency and/or critical care experience and the training is akin to advanced practice - imagine having some of the better flight RNs in left pondia as the standard for Emergency ambulance crew...

even where Technician ambulance staff have 300 -400 hours of classroom time and a years probation - they can use slective immobilisation protocols/ guidelines well - e.g. the UK and the guideline in JRCALC

there's been discussion of this nature on EMs focused forums before and yes peopel will defend their own system - but is it right that an alledged 'first world' country still relies on third world EMS provision in large parts ? ( heck even proper 'developing world' countires ant more than 110 contact hours of training from their ambulance staff - and SJA colleague whose 'real job' is a Paramedic training officer for an NHS Ambulance service took a sabbatical last year to go to Sri Lanka to deliver the Ambulance training SJA uses for volunteer crews in the Uk to members over there - so they could provide a decent ambulance service - end to end zero to hero the package is somewhere around 300 hours excluding driver training )
Top
 
No. 27
from RN1980
Old Dec 06, 2007, 09:31 AM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
again i reinterate, if you take upon yourself to clear a patient from a spinal package "no matter how long they have been on the board" and the patient suffers any deteriation from that action, you will be held liable in court, all the tncc and phtls courses that you've been to will not save you from being slam dunked...now i can't speak of the laws in england but here in the usa you'd be screwed. all you young er nurses out there pay heed...
Top
 
No. 28
from RN1980
Old Dec 06, 2007, 09:44 AM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by S.T.A.C.E.Y View Post
Ok, but my question is.....

So if you keep the patient on the spinal board until the doctor assesses, and the patient is found to have a fracture.......they don't go back onto the spinal board do they? Do they go back onto the hospital stretcher with c-collar on? So the board is coming off anyways right? Only meant for transport?

I understand what you're all saying about not wanting to remove the board on your own b/c what if the pt got a fracture during your non-doctor roll. But, when you do roll, a doctor doesn't routinely take the head do they? The nurses are still the ones doing the roll, with the doctor palpating the spine right??
well it depends on what type of fx they have, cervial,lumbar or if it's a stable fx or not. here is a simple scenerio-to er on spinal package, neuro assessment done, team log roll to assess the backside, reapplied to board to ct, now based on ct report and neuro assessment that determines if the pt is taken off, now if they have a spinal fx we consult neuro to come down and 9 times out of 10, they stay on the board until they get down there either theey eventually clear them after their assessement or they goto surgery or admitted with traction. when we log roll ussually another rn takes the head, so the doc can lay hands on the pt. this seems to be a misconception the board is not only meant for transport, it's there to keep the spinal alignment as immobile as possible, in an attempt to prevent any possible futher damage to the spine. eitheir way let the doc give you an order before you remove the package.
Top
 
No. 29
from ZippyGBR
Old Dec 06, 2007, 09:46 AM

Default Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce?
Originally Posted by RN1980 View Post
again i reinterate, if you take upon yourself to clear a patient from a spinal package "no matter how long they have been on the board" and the patient suffers any deteriation from that action, you will be held liable in court, all the tncc and phtls courses that you've been to will not save you from being slam dunked...now i can't speak of the laws in england but here in the usa you'd be screwed. all you young er nurses out there pay heed...
how in that cvase do you counter the accusation of gorss negligence nad professional incompetencne as well as the financial losses the patient without a cord injury suffers due to the pressure sores you have given them by keeping them in

1. unnecessary immobilisation - a a long board is a transfer device - there is discussion whether it is ever indicated when you don't need it for extrication (e.g. vs scoop / roll / move to a vacuum mattress or even as was practied until a few years ago scoop to strolley stretcher and head blocks on there ... )

2. imobilisation which is not clinically indicated - especially if the neck is 'cleared' soley by physical and clinical examination - or is the 'standard of care' to unnecessarily expose everyone who some cook book following glorified first aider has decided to collar... Arguements around 'if EMS has decided' fall down where EMS is Only Certified and follows protocols rather than clinical guidelines

how much additional risk is posed to the otherwise stable patient by a second well conducted log roll to allow clinical examination of the back if you have already rolled the patient once to remove the backboard 'therapeutically' but continued with immobilisation ... (even then they don't NEED to be rolled as they can be de boarded with a scoop stretcher or scoop hoist - with no significant 'rolling' ...

it's interesting how people on here are prepared to advocate a course of action which will unequivocably cause harm to the patient, especially when the justifications they use to continue this practice fall down becasue of the adequacy or otherwise of the pre-hospital providers.

this of course is a further problem with fee for service systems - if the radiologists are getting to bill of course the gold standard is that everyone with the slightest twinge of neck pain gets a CT scan and damn the risks from unnecessary irradiation vs clinicla examination or the simple 3 shot (lat, AP, Open mouth peg) plain film c-spine series

so much for professionalism,
so much for evidence base,
so much for patient advocacy ...

go and take a long look at what you are doing
Top
 
Page 3 of 7 < 12 3 4567 >
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
330 members
3,594 guests
3,924

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

6

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

63

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

10

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts

6

High-Tech Pump Does What Her Heart Can't

4

Air Force RN Found Not Guilty

7

California Imposes Stricter Rules Regarding Drug Abuse In...

48

Are older nurses being forced out of the profession?

3

An outlook in California?

8

Australian surgeons successfully separate conjoined twins



1

Society Needs Care Too

12

Why am I doing this, anyway?

2

Nurse Heal Thyself

9

My Papa, why I am the nurse I am today.

17

I made it through

11

An angel's gaze

16

A Sister Never Forgets

16

Ruby's Marbles

37

What Do Operating Room Nurses Do?

14

My Little Old Jedi

20

I love this job......

23

"I hear voices"

19

Preventing FRUTI (Foley Related Urinary Tract Infection) in...

24

Error and Attitude

10

It's Just a Shower





Sponsored Links

Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: