Re: Nurses taking patient's off backboards without doctor clearnce? Originally Posted by RN1980
again i reinterate, if you take upon yourself to clear a patient from a spinal package "no matter how long they have been on the board" and the patient suffers any deteriation from that action, you will be held liable in court, all the tncc and phtls courses that you've been to will not save you from being slam dunked...now i can't speak of the laws in england but here in the usa you'd be screwed. all you young er nurses out there pay heed...
how in that cvase do you counter the accusation of gorss negligence nad professional incompetencne as well as the financial losses the patient without a cord injury suffers due to the pressure sores you have given them by keeping them in
1. unnecessary immobilisation - a a long board is a transfer device - there is discussion whether it is ever indicated when you don't need it for extrication (e.g. vs scoop / roll / move to a vacuum mattress or even as was practied until a few years ago scoop to strolley stretcher and head blocks on there ... )
2. imobilisation which is not clinically indicated - especially if the neck is 'cleared' soley by physical and clinical examination - or is the 'standard of care' to unnecessarily expose everyone who some cook book following glorified first aider has decided to collar... Arguements around 'if EMS has decided' fall down where EMS is Only Certified and follows protocols rather than clinical guidelines
how much additional risk is posed to the otherwise stable patient by a second well conducted log roll to allow clinical examination of the back if you have already rolled the patient once to remove the backboard 'therapeutically' but continued with immobilisation ... (even then they don't NEED to be rolled as they can be de boarded with a scoop stretcher or scoop hoist - with no significant 'rolling' ...
it's interesting how people on here are prepared to advocate a course of action which will unequivocably cause harm to the patient, especially when the justifications they use to continue this practice fall down becasue of the adequacy or otherwise of the pre-hospital providers.
this of course is a further problem with fee for service systems - if the radiologists are getting to bill of course the gold standard is that everyone with the slightest twinge of neck pain gets a CT scan and damn the risks from unnecessary irradiation vs clinicla examination or the simple 3 shot (lat, AP, Open mouth peg) plain film c-spine series
so much for professionalism,
so much for evidence base,
so much for patient advocacy ...
go and take a long look at what you are doing
Nursing News