Potential MN Nurses Strike? - Page 21Register Today!
- Jul 27, '10 by SCSTxRNHmmm.. how hard would it be to learn Norwegian?
- Jul 27, '10 by msn10That nurse in Norway also gets 8 weeks PAID vacation every year, 6 months PAID maternity or paternity leave, FREE college education for life (NO STUDENT LOANS), FREE health care, and the highest standard of living in the world. So her $3000 net monthly salary would actually be about $10,000 monthly USD minimum.
I can't put it up on this thread but my sister-in-law works as a corporate relocator for a major corp and they have a cost of living calculator. At the end of the day, US nurses make more per hour with all other factors considered. I think we can be proud of that fact and realize that based on the ICN, the United States is the most desirable place for international nurses to migrate to.
Also, Norway's HC system is not all that wonderful.There are significant waiting times for many procedures. Many Norwegians go abroad for medical treatments. The average weight for a hip replacement is more than 4 months. “Approximately 23 percent of all patients referred for hospital admission have to wait longer than three months for admission.” Also, care can be denied if it is not deemed to be cost-effective.
- Aug 18, '10 by kitty29Quote from CNL2BI had believed and supported the fact that the MN nurses seemed to be striking for better staffing ratios...however in the end they did settle for just more money....so tell me who really won? No one really...Nothing good happens or results when a strike is decided in my view. I am glad they settled...and honestly think they should have stopped when the one day thing was over.This rant is ridiculous. Exactly how many years has it been since you worked at the bedside? Since when is a 4:1 acute care ratio a cakewalk? I have to say NO, we don't all know this -- similar ratios are now legally mandated in CA -- so the entire state doesn't agree with you, and this is coming soon to a hospital near you via the NNU, whether you agree with it or not. I am seeing this as a HUGE national push that nearly all bedside nurses agree with. Regardless of whether or not a bedside nurse wants to buy into a union or agree with it's governance, the profession as a whole is dedicated to providing excellent care, and we are no longer able to do that without mandated patient ratios because of people like YOU. Acute care hospital patients are now the sickest of the sick. Floor patients are now the ICU patients of 30 years ago. Unfortunately, management strategies haven't changed to reflect this reality --- hence the union involvement.
I also really resent your statements about "real" nurses being able to handle a 10:1 ratio, and the partying/drinking on the picket lines. Excuse me? Do you have some sort of documentation to back that up? I'm sure if nurses were drinking on the picket lines it would have been all over the news -- I live in Minnesota, and would have gotten the local scoop either via the newspaper or the TV news. And yeah, sure, real nurses can take 10 patients -- but they can't provide even adequate care to 10 acute care patients. Get real. Get your butt out of the boardroom and follow a "real" nurse for a shift and find out what she/he really does these days.
Joint commission has data out there (I believe it was previously posted in this thread, so I'm not going to link it) that states that nearly 25% of reported serious errors were related to nurse staffing issues. How does that play into your ideology? Don't you, as an exec, participate in the survey process and report to them? If you think your 10:1 RNs can get all their required joint commission charting done on 10 patients so you can CYA and maintain your accreditation without missing/falsifying information AND actually take care of the patients, you are sorely mistaken.