Published
It's policy where I work that you must aspirate from a sheath before pulling it. The theory is that any clot at the tip could be stripped loose as the sheath is pulled. It (in theory) could then embolize to the lower leg. If we cannot aspirate, we are to have 2 nurses dc the sheath. One is to connect the syringe and maintain negative pressure as the sheath is pulled. This all came directly from one of our senior interventional cardiologists. I'm not sure where he found the evidence to back it up.
Not really necessary but it's not going to hurt anything to do it. Having someone keep negative pressure with a syringe while another pulls sounds a bit ludicrous to me. I've pulled a BUNCH of them over the last 13yrs (several as a Student working in a CCU), and various hospitals have various policies, I believe keeping an Arterial transducer and pressure bag w/ 2:1 Heparin should help prevent most "embolic" possibilities, and that MOST places check ACT's except if they've used Angiomax, which is seemingly becoming more common. Certainly not a "bad idea" per se to aspirate a little. I worked with a group of people who one time used to let the site spurt a couple spurts of blood across the room before applied pressure because they thought the the sheath itself may have a "clot" on it, and they wanted to let the body "spurt it out." Now those are some people that need to have a refresher in reducing potential exposures in the workplace.
Here is a URL from Boston Scientific: they say to aspirate.....
ALCCRN
61 Posts
Does your facility still teach you (or say in the policy) to aspirate 2-3 cc prior to removing a sheath? Or is this old school? I'm leaning toward old school but need some evidence-based practice to back me up...Any suggesstions on what direction to take? And what does your facility do?