Scenario: your patient is scheduled to have a right BKA. The doctor's pre-op DX is gangrene of the right foot. The patient is draped out for a normal extremity case with extra care being given to the patient's foot which is draped with an impervious stockinette that is wrapped with coban to create a seal around the foot. The actual incision is not made on the foot, rather it is made just below the knee where there is no sign of gangrene, inflammation, infection or open wounds.
The debate: :argue:
:down:some people feel that the wound class is contaminated because of the pre-op DX. Is this because it is assumed that somehow the set up/sterile field was contaminated by the gangrenous foot?
:up:others feel that the wound class is clean because the area in which the actual incision was made was free of infection, gangrene, etc. Also, they take into consideration the fact that the foot is covered and wrapped up.
So I ask. How would you classify this wound?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
How would you classify this wound:
Scenario: your patient is scheduled to have a right BKA. The doctor's pre-op DX is gangrene of the right foot. The patient is draped out for a normal extremity case with extra care being given to the patient's foot which is draped with an impervious stockinette that is wrapped with coban to create a seal around the foot. The actual incision is not made on the foot, rather it is made just below the knee where there is no sign of gangrene, inflammation, infection or open wounds.
The debate: :argue:
So I ask. How would you classify this wound?