Published
I would think that it would be much less stressful for the Nursing profession, your thoughts?
Australia is really big on home haemo. It is much, much cheaper than in-centre dialysis and has better outcomes for the patients. There is nothing not to like about it in terms of the benefits for the patient. However, patients refuse to do it. The majority would prefer to have someone else do their dialysis for them and people are still non-compliant at home - except we don't know about it until it's too late. As stated above, many people do not have someone willing to help them. For PD, I don't believe the patients need a helper but for HD they absolutely do. It's a safety issue.
westieluv
948 Posts
Do you think the day will come where patients will be forced into home HD? The majority of the patients in our chronic unit have no desire for home HD, because they prefer to come in, stay for their allotted time, and then go home and forget about it until their next treatment, inasmuch as they can forget it, considering their dietary and fluid restrictions.
So this leads me to wonder...if the government decides that home hemo MUST be "the wave of the future" because it will save them billions of dollars, would they find a way to force people into it? Maybe make it so that those on home hemo get a full ride, cost wise, while those in ICD would start to have a co-pay of some kind?
I know it doesn't seem feasible, but when it comes to the government and healthcare payouts, stranger things have happened.