Published
How Not to Report a Fatal Outcomehttp://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/07/swine_flu_how_not_to_report_a.php#m
We knew it had to happen sooner or later. The first health care worker (that we know of) in this pandemic, has died supposedly of "natural causes" which is to say that he had blood clots in his lungs. Yet, he was positive for swine flu, and yes, he did have viral pneumonia...
How often does a death certificate not reveal all of the factors that come into play to cause the early demise of a patient? We've all seen this before.
Now how about getting serious about providing PPE in all health care facilities including the places where we are most likely not to see them such nursing homes, assisted living, clinics and doctors' offices?
The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.
This is really irksome. It bothers me that the old time GPs in 1918 would have called this what it is, a flu death. It raises the question, "Is someone applying pressure for political and economic reasons to play this thing down?" Shame, shame, shame on them, how can this thing possible be battled if the facts are not clear. This is one of the more important things you have posted
I don't know about what's going on now, but when Hurricane Andrew hit Miami, the "official" death toll was like 56, 57, something like that. The son of a coworker was in the national guard, and he told her he saw a refrig. warehouse that had hundreds of bodies in it -- homeless, illegals, old folks with no family to come looking for them -- he saw it, because he guarded it. And there were pages and pages and pages of "Looking for..." or "Call home..." adds in the newspapers for weeks and weeks. Not the kind of thing that goes on when you've got less than 100 dead. South Florida is all about tourism, and nobody would want to go visit "Dead People R Us." So if there was no ID, there was no body....
Remember the scene in "The Stand" where the Nick figures out that the news is being altered (in his case, there's no video from games and such being talked about). I have a feeling we're all going to have our own, personal "Nick" moment, sometime this fall...
Telling the Truth vs Managing the Truth
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=266873&postcount=4
Kudos, Dr. Thornton! This is how all pandemic communication should be.
From my perspective in behavioral health this is the resource I will promote:
Quote:
The second most important resource is communication. Getting and sustaining
compliance – changing behavior and keeping it changed – requires winning public trust.
Gaining trust requires explaining in detail why each recommendation was made and why others were not. It also requires, when decisions are made, taking the offense through a massive campaign to dominate all media, including the internet. And if the situation becomes severe, experience from 1918 to SARS demonstrates that only full and candid disclosure of the truth will contain panic. This author is wary of the term “risk communication.” It implies management of information. You do not manage the truth.You tell the truth. The most significant deficiency I have seen in the communications arena is using one message for all circumstances eg "the person died with pre-exisitng medical conditions," and "prevent getting flu by staying home when sick."
The authorities clearly are trying to get people to remain calm, wash their hands and to stay home when sick. However, giving the same message to all people in all circumstances does not acheive a unform behavioral response. People will behave according to their own risk assessment with the information they have. Some people prepare for a storm 3 days in advance, others when the storm is 3 hours away. Thus a general storm warning is insufficient for the public to prepare for the pandemic. People in affected communities need more details in order to make their own risk assessment and to adjust their behaviors.
Joe Thornton MD, psychiatrist
__________________
All epidemics are behavioral. JT
Swine Flu Did Contribute to GP's Death
http://www.dunstabletoday.co.uk/dunstable-news/Swine-flu-did-contribute-to.5475581.jp
Swine flu did play a significant role in the death of a popular Dunstable GP, health authority bosses say.
Following the death of Dr Michael Day, there was speculation among the national media that his death had been caused to underlying health issues.
Dr Day, 64, who had worked at the Priory Gardens Health Centre for 35 years, had tested positive for the H1N1 virus following his death at the Luton & Dunstable Hospital on July 11.
A post-mortem examination last Tuesday ruled that Dr Day died from natural causes and national newspapers subsequently reported he died from further health complications, including a blood clot on the lungs.
A statement released by NHS Bedfordshire on Friday said: "The final coroner's report following the post-mortem into Dr Day's death has confirmed that swine flu was a significant factor in his death."
indigo girl
5,173 Posts
How Not to Report a Fatal Outcome
http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/07/swine_flu_how_not_to_report_a.php#m
We knew it had to happen sooner or later. The first health care worker (that we know of) in this pandemic, has died supposedly of "natural causes" which is to say that he had blood clots in his lungs. Yet, he was positive for swine flu, and yes, he did have viral pneumonia...
How often does a death certificate not reveal all of the factors that come into play to cause the early demise of a patient? We've all seen this before.
Now how about getting serious about providing PPE in all health care facilities including the places where we are most likely not to see them such nursing homes, assisted living, clinics and doctors' offices?
The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.