Published
Brain-damaged woman's feed tube removed
Gov. Bush orders legal team to find way to intervene
The Associated Press
PINELLAS PARK, Fla. -- Doctors Wednesday removed the feeding tube that has been keeping alive a severely brain-damaged woman at the center of an epic legal battle between her parents, who want her to live, and her husband, who said she would rather die.
Terri Schiavo, 39, underwent the procedure at the Tampa Bay area hospice where she has been living for several years, said her father, Bob Schindler. Attorneys representing her husband, Michael Schiavo, said it will take between a week and 10 days for her to die.
About 100 protesters stood outside the hospice in what has become a 24-hour vigil staged by advocates for the disabled and anti-abortion activists. The decade-long legal battle between the Schindlers and their son-in-law has drawn international attention for the fierceness of the family fight.
Bob Schindler said he and his wife, Mary, went in to see their daughter shortly after the tube was removed and gave her a kiss and hugged her. He said his daughter appeared groggy and was not as responsive as they claim she normally has been.
"She's OK for the next couple of days," said Suzanne Carr, Terri Schiavo's sister. "We are just going to try to work some magic and hopefully a miracle.
"I have to believe that somebody is doing something, somewhere to stop this judicial homicide."
Michael Schiavo and his attorney George Felos were not immediately available for comment after the procedure.
The tube removal came just hours after Gov. Jeb Bush told the Schindlers that he was instructing his legal staff to find some means to block the court order allowing Michael Schiavo to end his wife's life.
"We are going to seek whatever legal alternatives are available and seek the best minds to find another avenue to submit to the courts to see if there can be a change in this ruling," Bush said at an appearance in Dover dedicating new housing for migrant workers.
"I am not a doctor, I am not a lawyer. But I know that if a person can be able to sustain life without life support, that should be tried," the governor said, adding the "ultimate decision of this is in the courts."
Bob Schindler Jr., Terri Schiavo's brother, said the family was heartened by the governor's last-minute effort. The Schindlers have pleaded with Bush -- who in previous legal findings have supported their efforts to obtain therapy for their daughter -- to intervene.
"The family has not given up hope on Terri," Bob Schindler Jr. said following the meeting with Bush. "We have spoken to the governor, and he hasn't given up hope either."
The tangled legal case has already been handled by 19 separate judges, and Wednesday's tube removal was the third time a date had been set.
Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed for two days in 2001 before a judge ordered feeding resumed based on new evidence; attorneys have said there is no such legal tactic to take this time.
A state appeals court in Lakeland rejected motions by an attorney for the Schindlers this week, and they say their legal remedies have been exhausted.
Terri Schiavo has been in a vegetative state since her heart stopped in 1990 due to a potassium imbalance. Her parents believe she is capable of learning how to eat and drink on her own.
Michael Schiavo says he is carrying out his wife's wishes that she not be kept alive artificially. The parents say their daughter has shown signs of trying to communicate and could be rehabilitated, although court-appointed doctors have said she will never recover.
"In our eyes, it's murder," Bob Schindler Sr. said Wednesday on CBS' "Early Show."
Felos said that the Schindlers were "still in denial" over Terri Schiavo's wishes not to be kept alive.
Doctors have testified that the noises and facial expressions Terri Schiavo makes are reflexes and do not indicate that she has enough mental capabilities to communicate with others.
In 1993, the Schiavos were awarded more than $1 million in medical malpractice claims against the doctors who failed to diagnose her chemical imbalance. Michael Schiavo told a jury he intended to take care of his wife for the rest of her life, which medical experts predicted would be until she was about 51 years old.
After the money was awarded, the Schindlers say Michael Schiavo first mentioned his wife didn't want to be kept alive artificially. Michael Schiavo has said he was in denial and hoped his wife would recover, only to gradually realize she would not.
The Schindlers have further alleged that much of the money that was to be used for their daughter's care has been spent by Michael Schiavo on attorney's fees as he sought to end her life.
The Florida Supreme Court has twice refused to hear the case. It also has been rejected for review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Schindlers first sought to remove Michael Schiavo as his wife's guardian in 1993 after a falling out over her medical care. They say he now has a conflict of interest because he is engaged to another woman and they have a child together.
Michael Schiavo has refused to divorce his wife saying that he fears her parents would ignore her desire to die if they became her guardians.
I have been in the medical field for more than half of my life and have seen things that would curl your toes.
But keeping someone alive who can no longer function and relies on a breathing machine to sustain life is not living.
In the LTAC I work at we have done a lot of comfort measures. We get these train wrecks in and some we have been able to help and sent them home to continue living a full life and some who will never recover. Well, those are the ones that the family wants everything done. "Spare no cost and keep them alive". Our Doctors are the best and they have no problem being up front with the families and telling them how things are.
The worst thing is when they bring in a MPA or Living Will and expect us to go against them. It is very difficult and a legal liability everytime. The pt has made their wishes known and the family still goes against it.
I have made my wishes known to my family and expect them to stand by them. I will come back and haunt them otherwise. lol
From a source other than the actual reportIn 45% of cases involving hospitalized patients who were involuntarily euthanized, the patients' families had no knowledge that their loved ones' lives were deliberately terminated by doctors. (18)
I find this kind of statement completely unbelievable.............as in "not". Where were the families anyway? Out on smoke break?
Did the doc just sneak in and turn up the rate on the drip to get that ol' cancer patient out of the way before lunch?
Involuntary euthanasia is not condoned under the Dutch guidelines so it isn't legal. There may be a problem with some loopholes being exploited to give some dying patients a peacful death, but I find it hard to believe that doctors are just whacking patients willey-nilley without a mention to the family.
When I see a "report" that has no balance of pro and con, I get suspicious.
Maybe it's just that I can't imagine such a healthcare system. That's pretty weird.
I didn't see any English copies of the original report or have time to do a backround check on the author(s).
Peeps Mcarthur
1,018 Posts
By LydiaGreen
How did the group putting the stats together decide that it was "against the person's wishes".
Or is it just that they had no living will.
Either way it sounds like a spin-doctor and not a medical DR:chuckle