The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

you have to find someone to do the study, if there is no gain, no study.

It's a matter of semantics I guess. You are describing, at least in a scientific sense (and I struggle to think of anything in terms other than science, probably why I have such a stellar personality), "opinion": a view/judgement formed about something that is not necessarily based on fact. "Facts" can always be proven.

As for the conclusions, I always tell my patients that "just because a study doesn't show a net effect doesn't mean that it won't help you" there is individual variation inherent in everything (why vitamin C works for some and not others, why some people have rare reactions to vaccines, why vaccines aren't 100% effective, why placebo works, etc); studies simply show that on a population scale, when individual variability is taken out of the equation, whether there is a significant difference between a control and a variable.

are you trying to make your self look foolish?

As an oncology certified nurse, and as someone with cancer, I can't love this post enough. Not that it will reach its intended target, but at least you fought the good fight macawake.

If only I had known that all I needed for my cancer was an eye of newt, wing of bat, tongue of snake. Oh, and a little valerian root. Boil them in a tea, forever cancer free.

/sarc

ETA: I see from another post I wouldn't have even needed all of that. Just some heapin' spoons of blackstrap molassas and Arm & Hammer!

Seriously, there is no way that works! That is like using old nun's urine to make medicine, or boiling the bark of a tree. You might as well suggest limes for scurvy, or snake venom derivatives for blood pressure and pain relief. Next thing you you know, you'll be talking about engines that run off of vegetable oil and alternative energy sources like solar energy.

LOL!....

Talk to some of the generous Cancer Control Society cancer SURVIVORS, and they will gladly share what helped them to conquer their cancers.

Some people will survive their cancer dx. without any treatment. I would love to know how many of the Cancer Control "survivors," had diseases that were stage lll or lV.

then go pay the site a visit....
Oh I get it. I just assume everyone is arguing with me. ;)

then how can you believe stats when they are manipulated in this fashion??

You don't think people die from the flu every year?

Let's count the people in America who died of Ebola last year compared to flu.

Come on.

yes, let's. confirmed cases of the flu only. the estimates haven't changed in years. so much for efficacy of the vax.

not a cure, miracle or otherwise, just another option, usually pursued AFTER the failure of allopathic medicine

You are right. It is outrageous. Strange how people turn a blind eye to that.

Macawake's post was amazing and yes, it is heartbreakingly sad to see what kinds of baloney pucky miracle cures people fall for.

We use blackstrap molasses on the corns, oats, and barley for my son's 4-H sheep. It was pretty funny to read about it being a miracle cure.

The number of annual influenza deaths is reported as both "Influenza and Pneumonia", and Influenza alone. The reason they are combined is that influenza is the most common cause of fatal pneumonia. For influenza and pneumonia combined it's about 57,000 deaths per year just in the US, for influenza alone it's about 36,000 deaths.

where are the stats for that, were is the testing to back it up, and why hasn't the est. changed over the years, if the vax works??

But many persons do not seem to be aware of sciences short comngs, thinking it infallible.

As someone whose parent tried the holistic route to cure cancer, let me assure you that in the end, you wind up sick as hell and needing hospital care either way.

Perhaps the chemo can buy you twenty additional years to live your life, or more. Perhaps you are one of the unlucky ones who doesn't respond to traditional therapy, but at least you have professional palliative care and symptom management. Or maybe you actively choose not to pursue treatment, but for the sake of others, are HONEST about the fact that alternative medicine and diet only take one so far.

The holistic route bought my parent eight years of silent suffering and excruciating pain, as well as unknown sums of wasted money. And I have yet to meet a cancer survivor who truly cured him or herself using totally holistic methods. My parent used that line, too, in motivational speaking to those who wished to believe in pseudo-science--until 6 months prior to death, when they could no longer ignore the signs of extensive metastasis.

Sorry to get off topic, but pseudo-science is not harmless. Chemo and radiation (and vaccines, for that matter) never purport to be harmless, and that is the difference.

SCIENCE is aware of its shortcomings.

i would love to "like" this post 100 times....

So, in summary:

1. I will get the flu shot. Mainly because I can't breathe with the Mask on.

2. The shot is not for my protection, but rather for the weaker members of the herd.

3. It is apparently okay to use words such as "ignorant" and "stupid" in reference to alternative ideas.

4. Vax-choice advocates generally have little scientific evidence to back up their claims.

5. Vax-all advocates have flawed scientific evidence filled with bias and confounding variables that cannot be controlled for.

6. Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.

7. They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.

Even a stopped clock will tell the correct time twice a day. If it's such a miracle cure, why aren't there peer reviewed studies regarding it?

because it doesn't fit into their paradigm.

Puh leeze. If there was no profit they wouldn't be doing it. We'd be looking to the Red Cross, or WHO for vaccines.

it may not be large percentage wise, but it is RISK FREE.