Published
yes, where I used to work we do sequential without inverting the dialyzer.
But where I'm working now they invert it and when I asked them why, their response was "because it's in the protocol."
***** does it mean they blindly follow the protocol without understanding it? There's always a rationale for procedures and that's what I want to know in this case.
from what i understand (and i dont know if its the real reason- or the research behind it) we turned the venous side up b/c the bi carb and acid arent being used- you are just removing fluid- with the red side down (the side hat removes the fluid) it's easier to pull fluid- using gravity to help- hope this makes sense-
Why is it contraindicated to do sequential to patients with hyperkalemia?
Hi Sir. If I may answer you. Sequential UF, we only remove excess fluid from the patient. It is not really a contraindication, but perhaps regular HD is much better. That person needs clearance also which is achieved by HD or HDF always.
rogue_maverick
167 Posts
We have patients who come in way too much above their dry weights so they get scheduled for an extra treatment the next day.
The charge nurse would only do sequential UF to them for 2 hours for the extra treatment. Is this also the practice in other parts of the world?
Also, what's the rationale behind positioning the dialyzer with the venous port placed up when on SEQ UF?