Rooming-in Vs. Nursery Care

Published

Rooming-in. This is the option we encourage most mothers and babies to enjoy. Full rooming-in allows you to exercise your mothering instincts when the hormones in your body are programmed for it. In our experience, and that of others who study newborns, mothers and babies who fully room-in enjoy the following benefits:

Rooming-in babies seem more content because they interact with only one caregiver--mother.

Full rooming-in changes the caregiving mindset of the attending personnel. They focus their attention and care on the mother, who is then more comfortable and able to focus on her baby.

Rooming-in newborns cry less and more readily organize their sleep-wake cycles. Babies in a large nursery are sometimes soothed by tape recordings of a human heartbeat or music. Rather than being soothed electronically, the baby who is rooming-in with mother is soothed by real and familiar sounds.

Mother has fewer breastfeeding problems. Her milk appears sooner, and baby seems more satisfied.

Rooming-in babies get less jaundiced, probably because they get more milk.

A rooming-in mother usually gets more rest. She experiences less separation anxiety, not wasting energy worrying about her newborn in the nursery, and in the first few days newborns sleep most of the time anyway. It's a myth that mothers of nursery-reared babies get more rest.

Rooming-in mothers, in our experience, have a lower incidence of postpartum depression.

Rooming-in is especially helpful for women who have difficulty jumping right into mothering. One day while making rounds I visited Jan, a new mother, only to find her sad. "What's wrong?" I inquired. She confided, "All those gushy feelings I'm supposed to have about my baby--well, I don't? I'm nervous, tense, and don't know what to do." I encouraged Jan, "Love at first sight doesn't happen to every couple, in courting or in parenting. For some mother-infant pairs it is a slow and gradual process. Don't worry your baby will help you, but you have to set the conditions that allow the mother-infant care system to click in." I went on to explain what these conditions were.

All babies are born with a group of special qualities called attachment- promoting behaviors-- features and behaviors designed to alert the caregiver to the baby's presence and draw the caregiver, magnet like, toward the baby. These features are the roundness of baby's eyes, cheeks, and body; the softness of the skin; the relative bigness of baby's eyes; the penetrating gaze; the incredible newborn scent; and, perhaps, most important of all, baby's early language--the cries and precrying noises.

Here's how the early mother-infant communication system works. The opening sounds of the baby's cry activate a mother's emotions. This is physical as well as psychological. Upon hearing her baby cry, a mother experiences an increased blood flow to her breasts, accompanied by the biological urge to pick up and nurse her baby. This is one of the strongest examples of how the biological signals of the baby trigger a biological response in the mother. There is no other signal in the world that sets off such intense responses in a mother as her baby's cry. At no other time in the child's life will language so forcefully stimulate the mother to act.

Picture what happens when babies and mothers room-in together. Baby begins to cry. Mother, because she is there and physically attuned to baby, immediately picks up and feeds her infant. Baby stops crying. When baby again awakens, squirms, grimaces, and then cries, mother responds in the same manner. The next time mother notices her baby's precrying cues. When baby awakens, squirms, and grimaces, mother picks up and feeds baby before he has to cry. She has learned to read her baby's signals and to respond appropriately. After rehearsing this dialogue many times during the hospital stay, mother and baby are working as a team. Baby learns to cue better; mother learns to respond better. As the attachment-promoting cries elicit a hormonal response in the mother, her milk- ejection reflex functions smoothly, and mother and infant are in biological harmony.

The baby-in-plastic-box scene. Now contrast this rooming-in scene with that of an infant cared for in the hospital nursery. Picture this newborn infant lying in a plastic box. He awakens, hungry, and cries along with twenty other hungry babies in plastic boxes who have by now all managed to awaken one another. A kind and caring nurse hears the cries and responds as soon as time permits, but she has no biological attachment to this baby, no inner programming tuned to that particular newborn, nor do her hormones change when the baby cries. The crying, hungry baby is taken to her mother in due time. The problem is that the baby's cry has two phases: The early sounds of the cry have an attachment-promoting quality, whereas the later sounds of the unattended cry are more disturbing to listen to and may actually promote avoidance .

The mother who has missed the opening scene in this biological drama because she was not present when her baby started to cry is nonetheless expected to give a nurturing response to her baby some minutes later. By the time the nursery- reared baby is presented to the mother, the infant has either given up crying and gone back to sleep (withdrawal from pain) or greets the mother with even more intense and upsetting wails. The mother, who possesses a biological attachment to the baby, nevertheless hears only the cries that are more likely to elicit agitated concern rather than tenderness. Even though she has a comforting breast to offer the baby, she may be so tied up in knots that her milk won't eject, and the baby cries even harder.

As she grows to doubt her ability to comfort her baby, the infant may wind up spending more time in the nursery, where, she feels, the "experts" can better care for him. This separation leads to more missed cues and breaks in the attachment between mother and baby, and they go home from the hospital without knowing each other.

Not so with the rooming-in baby. He awakens in his mother's room, his pre-cry signals are promptly attended to, and he is put to the breast either before he needs to cry or at least before the initial attachment-promoting cry develops into a disturbing cry. Thus, both mother and baby profit from rooming-in. Infants cry less, mothers exhibit more mature coping skills toward their baby's crying, and the infant-distress syndrome (fussiness, colic, incessant crying) is less common than with nursery-reared babies. We had a saying in the newborn unit: "Nursery-reared babies cry harder; rooming-in babies cry better."A better term for "rooming-in" may be "fitting in." By spending time together and rehearsing the cue-response dialogue, baby and mother learn to fit together well--and bring out the best in each other. :balloons:

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

this topic is one that tends to get heated. i don't think anyone is being "blasted" here, nor will i tolerate anyone flaming another on these threads.

disagreement is not akin to flaming or "blasting" others, remember.

and......

no one need get or feel defensive in presenting his/her opinion.

remember, everyone has his/her opinion, and let's just respect that. the arguments for and against rooming-in are legitimate and we can respect that, as well.

if you feel real annoyance or upset at what you are reading in disagreements, you can always take a break and revisit the topic when feeling less so.......

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.
If a baby is sick enough continuous oxygen saturation monitoring is warrented, it is not a parents job to "watch the numbers".They are not trained to do so.

It is not part of being involved the baby's care as say diaper changing and bathing would.

EXACTLY. Even if babes go home on apnea monitors, parents receive extensive training and teaching FIRST before it ever happens. It's a different situation, and NURSING and MEDICINE are responsible when baby is a patient of ours. It is NOT mom's/dad's responsibility, nor can we delegate it to them. If a baby is sick enough to be on monitors, the baby is sick enough to be under constant watch in our special care nursery. It's safest all the way around.

I'm coming to this discussion a little late and I'm not sure I have anything to add to the discussion, but my interest in this topic compels me to share my personal experience. My husband is in the Army and I gave birth in the Army Hospital on base. Overall, the hospital is very good, and I'm not bashing their setup, I just tend to disagree with mandatory rooming-in policies because of my experience. I breastfed my son and had a lot of problems with his latch and got very frustrated. Apparently the hospital had a lactation consultant and we requested that she come several times with no response until someone told us (on the day of discharge) that she had been on vacation. After the first full day, my nipples were covered with bleeding blisters and I was in agonizing pain feeding him, I would have given anything for a break. Despite his poor latch, he was always hungry and when he did feed, he would be on the breast for at least an hour, rest maybe an hour and be back to it. My husband tried to help, but our attempts to supplement with formula (at that point I didn't care) were completely unsuccessful, he simply would scream and refuse the bottle until I gave up and just put him back on the breast. I remember one night waking up from a very brief nap during the night at my son's first little whimpers and staring at him and thinking that there was nothing worse than being a mother and that I absolutely hated it. These feelings didn't last long, in spite of the agonizing pain, I did not experience anything more than transient PPD, but I strongly resented the fact that at that time I couldn't call the nurse and ask them just to take him for an hour because it was strictly against their policy. I resented the fact that I had been going about 96 hours awake with maybe 8 hours of short little naps scattered during that time because from the very beginning, my son slept very little and when he did sleep, there were visitors in the room. The hospital has a policy that they will not even watch the baby while you take a shower, which was difficult enough for me and I imagine much more difficult for the hundreds of women who give birth while their husbands are deployed here at Ft. Bragg. I think it is appropriate for hospitals to strongly encourage rooming-in, and I understand the viewpoint that nurses should not be looked at as babysitters, but I think if a mandatory rooming-in policy is in place, there needs to be adequate support measures for mothers during that time, and I think something needs to be available for the mothers that get into crisis-type situations as I believe I was (I have probably understated earlier how much I hated being a mother when my son woke me up, I hated him, I hated my husband and I thought my life was over, if I hadn't been so tired, I might have done something about it, I was that crazy at that point in time.) Okay, I'm off my soapbox, sorry to be so long.

Ooooooh, no well baby nursery. Oooooo, I'm in love.

Rachel makes a good point, though, that adequate supports need to be in place. I wish that we could get rid of well baby nurseries in the states.

We have rooming in and Do encourage that, but I am always very supportive of ANY Mom who feels a need for a nap or rest any time, night or day, and I welcome Baby to nursery during those times, and yes, you will have a much happier, more well rested Mother, who will appreciate the staff SO much for their consideration!! I have had 5 children, and those little breaks at 1 or 2 Am in the hospital were almost imperative for my exhaustion those few nights., Especially when you have a few others to go home to in a day or 2.I get very frustrated at a couple nurses on our floor who act "annoyed" when a Mom wants to put the baby in the nursery for a bit for a break. There are always nurses in the nursery anyway, so WHY NOT?? I Do think rooming in (in general) is wonderful however!! a Birthing Center must be flexible!! Kathie

+ Join the Discussion