Published
This is a current CNA press release regarding safety standards at an LA hospital.
RNs Warn Safety Standards Eroding at Kaiser LA Medical Center | National Nurses United
This piece could have been written 20 years ago.
Even in light of legislation, (California) H.R. 1821 - Registered Nurse Safe Staffing Act of 2013, (and others before it) these issues continue with, seemingly, little progress made.
Why do safe staffing issues continue to plague Nursing practice ?
herring_RN ~
Thank you for sharing those articles. They highlight my point. That being, patient outcomes are directly determined by Nurse / patient ratios.
Likewise, patient outcomes, ultimately, determine a hospital's profit margin.
Re~admission is more expensive than initial increased RN/patient ratios.
Not to mention the legal fees expense often incurred by a hospital regarding complications requiring re~admission.
When statistics clearly show relationship between patient outcome and RN/patient ratios, I don't understand how/why administrations get away with compromising patient care/safety.
Not to mention the safety and professional accountability of everyone involved.
herring_RN, ASN, BSN
3,651 Posts
Even though too many hospitals are violating the law the ratios have saved lives.
I know nurses at many hospitals. All claim to follow the law. At minimum they staff for the maximum number of patients allowed for the unit most of the time.
Too often many facilities fail to add staff for higher acuity patients as required. Those same hospitals often fail to provide a competent RN to take over the assignment of nurses when they take a meal or rest break.
The hospitals that do follow the law nearly all the time have staff nurses who document each and every time staffing is below standards AND nursing manageers and administrators who also insist on safe staffing as required by law.
In spite of too many facilities half way adherence to the law patients in California are less likely to die due to "Failure to Rescue" and more likely to survive.