Cedars- Sinai & Antelope Valley RNs with CNA

  1. Cedars-Sinai Loses Bid to Thwart Nurses' Union Vote

    03/28/2003 - 06:16 AM PST (14:16 GMT)

    By Jia-Rui Chong
    Times Staff Writer

    The regional office of the National Labor Relations Board has dismissed all objections by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to a vote by its nurses to unionize, paving the way for
    organization of registered nurses at the largest private hospital in the West.

    The victory by the California Nurses Assn. comes as another hospital district in the Antelope Valley officially recognized the right of the same union to represent registered
    nurses there. The victories cap a series of successful organizing efforts in Southern California by increasingly powerful nurses' unions.

    Cedars-Sinai nurses voted in December, 695 to 627, to join the union. The hospital had challenged the results on numerous grounds, including a charge that the union had
    threatened and intimidated nurses.

    But the administrative law judge who heard the regional appeal found no merit to the complaints.

    Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the 50,000-member California Nurses Assn., said she was elated. "We hope ... that Cedars-Sinai will sit down and negotiate a
    contract," DeMoro said.

    Cedar-Sinai officials would not comment. "We've not yet received the documentation and therefore are unable to comment," Vice President Grace Cheng said.

    According to National Labor Relations Board procedure, the hospital can appeal the labor relations board's decision to the national office in Washington, D.C.

    Eva Buenconsejo, a nurse at Cedars-Sinai for 20 years, said the board's decision was "such a relief."

    In between caring for patients, the neonatal intensive care nurse motioned fellow nurses into the conference room to tell them the news. "People were asking me every day
    whether the decision had come in. Now that it's here, everybody is so happy."

    Nurses at Antelope Valley were celebrating what Julia Mallyon, a neonatal intensive care unit nurse, called their "great victory."

    When the Antelope Valley Health Care District Board voted 4 to 0, with one abstention, to recognize the union and moved to begin bargaining, audience members stood up
    and cheered, Mallyon said.

    "We've been working in an unsafe situation," said Colleen Sichley, a mental health nurse. "There's no time to sit down, talk to patients about what's wrong.... There's no
    time even to know their names."

    Sichley said the triumph did not come easily. She made the first call to the California Nurses Assn. in February 2002, when she saw nurses crying in the parking lot
    because of their heavy patient loads. Some told her they were caring for as many as 16 patients each.

    In May, a majority of the hospital's 550 nurses voted to join the union. But the hospital board refused to recognize the vote because, board members said, the vote was not

    The election of two union-backed representatives to the five-member board in November resulted in a pro-union majority, nurses said.

    "Now we need to work on a contract that gives nurses more involvement in the process of caring for patients," Sichley said. "We need to decrease the patient load for each
    nurse and look at the amount of overtime."

    Ed Callahan, a spokesman for Antelope Valley Hospital, would not comment on how the board reached its decision. "All I can say is we're following the law so we're going
    to recognize them," he said.

    The nurses at Antelope Valley are the latest to join the California Nurses Assn., which has signed up about 6,000 nurses at 11 other hospitals in Southern California in the
    last two years. About 3,500 registered nurses at seven hospitals in Southern California have joined the Service Employees International Union, said union spokeswoman
    Lisa Hubbard.

    Hubbard said some hospitals still refuse to recognize unions that have won elections.
  2. Visit pickledpepperRN profile page

    About pickledpepperRN

    Joined: Mar '99; Posts: 13,361; Likes: 1,375


  3. by   sanakruz
    Right on. Now if CNA and SEIU can quit being at odds, a nurse-to-patient ratio law can get passed....
  4. by   pickledpepperRN
    The ratio law sponsored by CNA and opposed by SEIU was already passed.
    The DHS asked for more time for implementing it due to the state budget deficit and planning post 9/11.
    Last edit by pickledpepperRN on Mar 29, '03
  5. by   sanakruz
    Sorry my dear-
    I believe I could clarify my point by saying IMPLEMENTED as opposed to PASSED.
    I belong to SEIU. I signed every petition and ate every word of all their mailings.(I'm an LVN) Apparently while I was having my life and NOT PAYING ATTENTION the CNA had another agenda.
    Politics as usual and not a damn thing changes.
  6. by   sanakruz
    Do you live here in CA Spacenurse? Send me a pm. I have a concern with the DHS ever making ant changes any whwere. They are part of the problem.Ever work in long term care?