Published
I overheard an ED attending discussing a policy regarding the administration of propofol w/ an RN at work today. Apparently the policy states that propofol or any other medication may be administered to a non-intubated pt if an attending ED/Pulmonary physician is in the room. This would be done for a procedure ie: reduction of a fx....etc. I asked him why anesthesia personnel would not provide the anesthesia. He responded that the ED/Pulmonary physician is able to provide all services that anesthesia could. What do you guys think about this?
Maybe I should have clarified myself....I don't practice this anymore....my point in posting was just to agree that it is not as safe as everyone seems to think for non-anesthesia providers to administer the drug- and don't worry, I have already re-thought my position and am no longer a staff RN....I am on a much needed 10 week break before I start CRNA school in August. I will be sure to pass this on to our administration though, because we had the same question when this doc wanted us to bolus propofol for EVD insertion on non-intubated pt's and we were told it was OK. Thanks for the info.
This thread IS two years old, but ... once again:Compare a person perfectly competent to administer Versed and to monitor and intervene with a sedation ... to a pilot perfectly competent in a Cessna light aircraft.
Then drop that pilot into the cockpit of an F-14.
That's the difference between Versed and propofol, and that's just how fast a person will get themselves -- actually get the PATIENT, of course -- in trouble.
!
I love flying / anesthesia comparisons. What happens when you drop an F-15 pilot into the cockpit of a cessna?
Food for thought.
:)
jwk
1,102 Posts
If you're in Georgia, you should rethink your position - as I recall, the Georgia BON has ruled that it is illegal for Georgia RN's to bolus propofol.