Published
I were of childbearing age and not currently pregnant but thinking about it, I would be putting off pregnancy for as much as two years. I am not telling anyone how to run their life, I am just saying that knowing what I know about the risk if I were young I would delay. But I am certainly not young so the question is moot, but if I were 22 I would know I would more than likely be in the group that gets it so I would wait until the present wave had run it's course to get pregnant. I am just talking hypothetically, every one should do as they please with their life and make their own evaluation of the risk. . My guess is most OB docs would say that it is NOT necessary to delay starting a family. I am just saying I would.
indigo girl
5,173 Posts
http://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/pm/articles/2009/07/swine-flu-pregnant-women-told-to-work-as-usual.htm
I think we get the message that in the UK, staying home if you are pregnant is not encouraged. Argentina, on the other hand, told pregnant women to stay home and provided paid leave time for them to do so. But they are in the middle of a severe flu outbreak in the Argentine winter season right now so things likely look a lot different than it does in the UK in summer.
Warnings that employers need to protect staff or face legal action are very interesting. Would that include hospitals having pregnant staff work on suspected swine flu cases? Even CDC has recommended that these staff be reassigned, and if not possible at least not present if nebulizers, CPAP/BiPap, and other procedures that could aerosolize viral particles are being done.
http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidance/pregnant-hcw-educators.htm