Med overrides

Published

I'm a student doing my psych rotation. In our state, you can get a med override to give meds against a pt's will if 2 MDs agree. On the ward where I am it is always done via NGT. You call a code, 8 guys show up, you 5 point the pt. and shove an NG tube up their nose. Luckily, as students, we don't have to do this. I have enough trouble getting an NG tube down a pt. who agrees to it. I have watched though and there is blood everywhere. It is incredibly traumatic. Is this a common practice? I worked inpatient psych (some at the state mental hospital where we're doing our rotation) about 10 years ago and I don't remember NG tubes except for pt's who refused to eat. For med overrides, we tried po with a show of force, then IM meds. I asked my instructor and she said it was probably because a lot of newer psychotropics don't come IM. Well, what about a little Ativan then, wait 30 minutes, then try po again? What about IM Haldol or Geodon? There's gotta be a better way.

i agree - im to calm then try po if needed - no reason for this roughness...

Please keep us posted Imd:confused:

I tried to call Washington State Protection and Advocacy Service but got stuck in voicemail. So, I sent them an email. It said:

I am a student nurse, currently doing a mental health

rotation at Western State Hospital. I am appalled by

the procedure used to implement med overrides. I

understand that, in Washington state, the right of a

patient to refuse psychoactive medication can be

overridden on the strength of an evaluation by 2 MD's.

However, the method used to administer these

medications is barbaric and abusive. On the ward

where I worked last Wednesday, I observed a woman

overpowered by a group of MHTs, placed in 5 point

restraints, and an NG tube shoved up her nose against

her will. The placement of the NG was not successful,

and considerable bleeding resulted. The nurse then

inserted the tube in the other nostril which was

successful, but the patient pulled the NG tube out

before medications could be given. IM Ativan was then

given and the patient took the oral medications 30

minutes later after she was calm. On this ward, 5

point restraints and an NG tube is the standard order

for administering refused medications. I question why

there is not a protocol with a hierarchy of less

restrictive and intrusive interventions and why,

specifically, IM medications are not used.

If I can be of any help to you in investigating this

procedure, please contact me. Also contact me and

advise me if there is some state agency I should

report this too.

I have not heard back from them. I checked with some of the other students and, apparently, most patients are cooperative with the procedure if it is presented to them as inevitable. I just happened to see a particularly bad example. I still think it's needlessly intrusive. I also question the wisdom of exposing student nurses to this type of mental "health" environment. I can assure you, no one in my class wants to work as a psychiatric nurse. And I know that inpatient, long term, chronic state hospital patients are not the only psychiatric patients in the world.

I don't feel my instructor is supportive. As I have mentioned before, she has been very defensive of the staff and I feel I am getting a reputation as a trouble maker. I do need to pass clinicals. Maureen- what's a code 8?

+ Join the Discussion