Jump to content

Is EMG invasive or non-invasive procedure?

Student Assist   (10,838 Views | 7 Replies)

7,128 Profile Views; 261 Posts

I was doing Kaplan test and it says it's a non-invasive procedure. I think Kaplan is wrong, isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NeosynephRN specializes in ICU, PACU, Cath Lab.

564 Posts; 7,383 Profile Views

I think it is actually condsidered a non invasive...I was not sure but as I read this post I happened to be on the phone with a suregon that I know...he said it is non invasive, even though I have heard it can be really painful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

24 Posts; 1,111 Profile Views

I think there are two types of EMGs. One is invasive and painful while a newer version is non-invasive. On Loma Linda University Medical Center's patient teaching page, it states, "Impulses are recorded by attaching small disk electrodes to the skin surface over the muscle or by inserting needle electrodes into the muscle." So Kaplan must be testing to see if you know about the newer non-invasive test.

http://www.llu.edu/llumc/patvis/patedu.html

Thanks for posting. I learned something today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elvish is a BSN, DNP, RN, NP and specializes in Community, OB, Nursery.

3 Followers; 17 Articles; 5,259 Posts; 68,192 Profile Views

It's considered non-invasive, just like an EKG/ECG would be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 Posts; 549 Profile Views

If the skin is broken it is considered invasive. An EMG, or myography, is testing electrical impulses of the muscle by insertion of "needles"- this i would consider INVASIVE. Kaplan should differentiate which type of EMG, otherwise, it's invasive. I think they should review this question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DolceVita has 9 years experience as a BSN, RN and specializes in IMCU.

1,555 Posts; 9,840 Profile Views

I have had one and I can tell you it is invasive, hurt like a biotch and bled rather a lot.

Strictly speaking it probably was not invasive as far as the hospital was concerned because they did not have me sign a consent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DolceVita has 9 years experience as a BSN, RN and specializes in IMCU.

1,555 Posts; 9,840 Profile Views

They did do a multi-channel surface study first -- that was absolutely not invasive.

Kaplan should differentiate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 Posts; 549 Profile Views

Yea, if the question included the information that informed consent was obtained then that would clue us in a bit more. IV's are invasive and no consent is required, excluding PICC. Difficult to differentiate, especially when studying for NCLEX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Privacy, Cookies, and Terms of Service Policies to learn more.