Published
taking an x-ray at the end of the case, INSTEAD OF KEEPING UP WITH ALL COUNTS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CLOSURE OF THE LAST CAVITY, IS NOT EVER< NOR HAS IT EVER, BEEN ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE. All counts means: needles, sponges of all sizes, ie: q-tips to laps, implants and instruments. Unnecessary radiation exposure can be dangerous to patients, especially CHILDREN. Only LAZY , UNPROFESSIONAL, UNSCRUPULOUS, INSIDIIOUS scrub techs and nurses would pull such a stunt and should lose their jobs. This practice should be reported to JOINT COMMISSION, MEDICARE and MEDICAID FEDERAL AGENCY and include ALL ACCREDITATION organizations. they would jerk their accreditation and shut down the facility. Licenses and certifications would be taken away. THIS IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE ON ANY LEVEL AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON. WE HAVE STANDARDS OF CARE FOR A REASON. END OF STORY. If anyone does not wish to uphold these standards, they are in the medical profession for the wrong reasons and need to leave.
Avonlea said:That is incorrect. All counts for ALL procedures ,, especially when a cavity has been entered! WTH? Standards of care. Ever heard of those?
Hello @Avonlea and welcome to allnurses!
AORN guidelines state
QuoteAORN recommends that perioperative personnel account for instruments during all procedures in which there is a likelihood of retaining an instrument.
Source: https://aornjournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aorn.13804
If you look at this graphic from the article, while the box for instruments is marked as to be counted, the footnote clarifies "in all procedures for which the likelihood exists that an instrument could be retained (See Recommendation 5.1) and all procedures in which an open body cavity is entered (See Recommendation 5.2)"
This does not equate to requiring an instrument count on all procedures. Of course, if one's facility policy requires an instrument count on all cases, that policy should be followed. I have never worked in a facility that required instruments to be counted on all cases.
and I've never worked in a facility that doesnt require an instrument count on all procedures, at the very least, beginning and ending for minor procedures such as lacerations, as long as they are not GAPING . It's just sound practice, and AORN RECOMMENDATIONS are just that. RECOMMENDATIONS. Sloughfulness, laziness and irresponsibility has no place in the O.R., on any level. CHOOSING NOT to think and reason independently within your scope of practice, and just relying on Recommended Practices set down by AORN alone, won't save you in the court room. But perhaps the Culture of Excellence I was raised in, is different from the one you come from. Irrespectively, our patients we have sworn to protect and serve, deserve our best. I certainly give it to them and offer NO EXCUSES.
Additionally, I see where your document from AORN shows only an INITIAL Instrument COUNT being done for any of those. what would be the point in counting instruments at all if there wasnt a final count done to reconcile it is correct? ....see, thats where critical independent thinking comes in.....
LAM2010, BSN
129 Posts
Yes, I am asking, ALL cases? Even cataracts. Is your hospital counting everything that touches the patient? Ours is making us.