Published Jun 17, 2010
kgh31386, BSN, MSN, RN
815 Posts
I searched and found one thread..but I figured there would be more people. I was actually surprised by some of the questions. The book they gave us is pretty basic, but the questions on that test were pretty good I think in some cases, others were just kinda random. There were a decent number of who would I see first, what's the priority and what to do first, delegate, etc. Marlene said it's based on the 2010 Test plan and random questions...and if you retake it, you get entirely new questions, so that's good. I had 21 select all that apply on my practice test and they're my weakness...I only got 9 right, and I missed 11 because I was off by ONE ANSWER! I hate that. But has anyone taken those Hurst tests and thought they were on the level of Nclex maybe? I only got a 74% on this one. But I haven't gone back through the Hurst material yet...just trying to see what other people are getting on those 125 question tests. It gives you a breakdown of each area and your % when you're done. Then it has a column that says whether you would have passed or failed the real Nclex based on how you did overall on this test...think this is accurate? My little column said "pass" with a green thing. Who knows =/
JustinTJ, ADN, BSN
224 Posts
I took 2 of them before NCLEX. They seemed pretty good, I got 81 of 125 on both of them. Passed NCLEX at 75 afterwards. Hurst was very good for me.
caliotter3
38,333 Posts
Good to get the feel of testing and an idea of the scope of the questions. Only criticism that I've seen is that there isn't more.