A Feminist Approach to the Opioid Epidemic

Nonmedical prescription opioid abuse is an ongoing problem in America, with data showing an increase in this phenomenon in every state. This phenomenon found its genesis and growth within the masculine context of care. As this epidemic continues its threat on public health, it is time to consider alternative approaches to its treatment. One such approach is to implement a feminist ethic of care to improve the patient-provider relationship, foster autonomy, and to nurture national milieu Nurses General Nursing Article

Nonmedical prescription opioid abuse (NPOA) is an ongoing problem in America, with data showing an increase in this phenomenon in every state (Paulozzi & Xi, 2008). This phenomenon found its genesis and growth within the masculine context of care. As this epidemic continues its threat on public health, it is time to consider alternative approaches to its treatment. One such approach is to implement a feminist ethic of care to improve the patient-provider relationship, foster autonomy, and nurture the national milieu through interdependence. The means to this end may vary, but the nature of this perspective demands effective communication. Motivational interviewing represents a consistent, evidence-based means for exercising this approach to care.

The current perspective in treating the rising threat of NPOA relies on the masculine ethic of care. This view derives its treatment approach from the obligation of justice. That is to say, the masculine ethic of care is strongly concerned a more "hands off" approach to treatment. This duty of justice considers the patient as the sole, responsible party and, therefore, the fundamental agent of change and wellness. The way in which this is carried out is via a power dynamic in which the provider maintains an omniscient, fatherly role that emphasizes provider knowledge and patient obedience. Put another way, the masculine view stresses the notion that strong willpower and knowledge give rise to success. This method routinely omits empathy and patience from treatment and discounts the addiction research demonstrating impaired freedom of will (Vohs & Baumesiter, 2009). The result is a sense of failure and hopelessness felt by the patient.

The feminist approach highlights the importance of the patient-provider relationship through the exercise of empathy. Central to this perspective is interdependence and the balance of power between the provider and the patient. By maintaining this symmetry, then the provider may foster open-communication, elicit change-talk, and identify barriers and strengths to recovery. Furthermore, the nurse and patient can work together to use those factors to tailor the treatment plan and evoke patient autonomy in a way that increases the chance of positive health outcomes. This framework arises from a fundamental philosophy demonstrated throughout feminist history in which the marginalized provide the best insight into the provision of care within a society (Green, 2012).

In this model, the provider lessens the burden of responsibility by sharing that weight with the patient through a feminist ethic of care. That is not to imply that the provider strips the patient of power, but, instead, nurtures that power within the patient. This "motherly" role stands in strong contrast to the masculinity of the "fatherly" role. In this way, the provider-patient relationship takes a similar shape as a mother-child relationship, in which the provider guides the patient through treatment, fostering more and more autonomy along the way, until the patient ultimately becomes the sole decision-maker. This enables coping mechanisms and caregiving that equip the patient with the necessary skills to maintain wellness, rather than metaphorically kicking the patient from the nest. This feminist lens sets up the philosophy of care, but practice must align with this framework.

Ultimately, there are many ways to implement this approach. No matter the means in which one seeks to do so, the most important factor will be communication. Communication remains a tool in which the provider can cultivate relationships, derive patient-centered data, and tailor the plan of care. One method for communication is motivational interviewing. This form of counseling has demonstrated success in addiction treatment and in agreement with the feminist perspective. Motivational interviewing is a goal-oriented method that facilitates change by provoking intrinsic motivation from the patient, preserving patient-centered care (Miller, 1996). The practitioner remains nonjudgmental and maintains an open, equal relationship with the patient. As the provider paces with the patient, then the provider consistent demonstrates empathy, and allows the patient to argue for behavioral change. This provides the same level of autonomy and interdependence relative to feminist care models and, therefore, a practical match in implementing such models.

In conclusion, the feminist perspective of care in the treatment of NPOA offers an approach predictive of success. This ethic focuses on the patient-provider relationship to foster patient autonomy. By exercising empathy, then the caregiving, interdependent nature of feminism is preserved in a way that is congruent with the most recent research into addiction. Although there are many ways in which one can implement the feminist model, communication must remain a central component. Because of the caring, empathetic nature of this perspective, a nonjudgmental approach is paramount. Motivational interviewing is consistent with feminist approaches to care and, therefore, can be a valuable tool in effective communication.

References

Green B (2012) Applying Feminist Ethics of Care to Nursing Practice. J Nurs Care 1:111. doi:10.4172/2167-1168.1000111

Miller, W. R. (1996). Motivational interviewing: Research, practice, and puzzles. Addictive Behaviors, 21, 835-842. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(96)00044-5.

Paulozzi LJ, Xi Y. Recent changes in drug poisoning mortality in the United States by urban-rural status and by drug type. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(10):997-1005.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Addiction and free will. Addiction Research & Theory, 17(3), 231-235.

This is a very strange, very arrogant, and very ignorant thread.

We are taking specifics and making large generalized statements about them.

I would recommend we all familiarize ourselves with opioid use from a historical perspective, just take a look at laudanum, cocaine, and heroin for starters. What we see today is nothing new, nothing exciting, just a different flavor of the same poo sandwich.

OP - there seems to be a misunderstanding about

- the feminist point of view/ feminist philosophy and

- critical theory and marginalization

You somehow manage not only to take things out of context - you mix up stuff to the degree that it does not make sense.

It is my understanding that a feminist theory point of view would look at a situation/phenomenon from the view of gender inequality. But feminist theory does not equal a "caring approach" nor does that solve the narcotic crisis ....

Again, no where in the article is it even hinted at the writer studied the recent history of drug addiction and that is the invention of OxyContin and it's marketing to health care providers.

The recent phenomenon of opioid addiction is directly traceable to OxyContin. It is manufactured and marketed by a family-owned company that gains a very tidy profit from the drug.

Health care providers were told it was non-addictive.

Remind anybody of cigarette manufacturers? It reeks of the same game played by Big Tobacco.

And multiple states, including mine, have sued the makers of OxyContin for selling lies and fueling the opioid crisis.

We are told that pain is whatever the patient says it is. And we live in a society in which nobody wants to feel ANY pain. Couple those elements with providers being told lies about a pain medication, and well, you have the opioid crisis.

By the way, the family name is Sackler, and they are part of Purdue Pharma, the privately held company that makes OxyContin.

By the way, the parent company of Purdue, pleaded guilty in 2007 to a federal charge of misbranding OxyContin.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and postulate that the author really means 'feminine' or female perspective on this issue. The metaphor between 'feminist' and 'masculine' just doesn't work. We are well aware of the dominance men have had in the medical profession.

Whether you think opiod abuse is simply a lack of fortitude, self will, criminal activity, or a disease, individuals who have become addicted need to be treated. Opiod addiction needs to kept at the forefront. It is our brothers, sisters, friends and neighbors who are dying at alarming rates, for whatever reason. You're a Nurse, or wanting to become one for a reason. That would include providing compassionate care to whomever your responsible for in your position as a Nurse. I would hope saving anyone's life is important, regardless.

The notion of injecting 'empathy' into the process of treating individuals with an opiod addiction certainly makes sense. I don't have an issue with connecting empathy with the feminine side of an individual, whatever your gender.

The author is simply providing another methodology that might be used in getting us through this crisis. I would hope we would all be open to ANY additional ideas that help.

NoCommentHere

I agree that compassion is paramount to the foundation of treating addiction...however that is not a new idea. The same goes with individualized treatment plans for recovery...nothing new there.

What does need to change, and maybe this is what the OP meant, is the stigmatization of addiction in general society. It is counterproductive for society to judge and punish the addict. It is no wonder so many addicts hide and lead double lives, since recovery means not only admitting addiction, overcoming physical dependance, learning to positively cope, time and money spent on treatment...but on top of it all they face the risk of being labeleled and judged for years to come (if not the rest of their lives). The irony here is that the stress of recovery, combined with social stigma, makes the addicted person want to use a substance as a way of coping with the stress of recovery and the stigma!

However compassion can go so far as to coming back around to actually causing harm. That is why we need to drop the "pain is what a patient says it is" nonsense. Yes pain is subjective, but that is the very reason providers shouldn't go prescribing powerful pain medication for "whatever your pain is." We are using a subjective approach to determine objective treatment. Pain can always get worse, the subjective scale can shift. I learned this first-hand when I was the patient in an emergency.

One of our most widely used methods of assesssing pain is akin to asking a group of people "on a scale of one to ten, how cold is it in this room?", and depending on individual responses we dose them with a narcotic. Vitals are fine, but we do it anyway. Tell me, how would that make any more sense than what we do now for pain?

Treatment of addiction requires compassion and objectivity combined. The same goes with the treatment of physiological pain...however compassion does not mean a lack of being firm and doing what is right for the patient in the long run. The short-term pain will pass, pushing IV narcotics onto patients only opens a door that might lead to far more pain than the patient ever bargained for. Overtreatment of pain also increases the demand for opiates outside of the hospital, and the opiate supply supply obliges, thus increases availability of opiates to many more persons including those seeking to dull psychological pain. What's worse is that , as a result of the mess we're in, people who have real chronic pain are the ones who doubly suffer.

So yeah, we need to be more compassionate as a whole, I agree...we shouldn't judge addicts harshly. Yet we also need to combine compasssion with firm objectivity when prescribing or administering pain meds. Fostering resilience is a type of compassion too. Again, perhaps that is what the OP meant.

Specializes in Public health program evaluation.
The current opioid crisis was brought about the marketing of OxyContin by it's manufacturer. That is the

plain, and simple truth.

This article just left me thinking: Huh?

How did the author overlook the obvious: The role of Capitalism in Modern Medicine.

It is amazingly gender neutral.

If you want to understand the opioid crisis, investigate and learn about the pharmaceutical company that makes OxyContin. It is all the education you will need on the topic.

As always, FOLLOW THE MONEY.

THis thread is so very interesting to read. My first thought in any seemingly intractable situation is to ask, "who benefits from maintaining the status quo?"

When you find those people, you have some direction.

Who will be paid to take the time to do motivational interviewing?

Specializes in Public health program evaluation.
This is a very strange, very arrogant, and very ignorant thread.

We are taking specifics and making large generalized statements about them.

I would recommend we all familiarize ourselves with opioid use from a historical perspective, just take a look at laudanum, cocaine, and heroin for starters. What we see today is nothing new, nothing exciting, just a different flavor of the same poo sandwich.

THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS!!!!!

We need to be students of history to make sense of the present.

Specializes in Public health program evaluation.

Hey OP. Getting a lot of flak about addiction and feminism there.

Readiness for change through motivational interviewing is something that few HCPs have the skills or inclincation to assess. It's far easier to say "bad addict" and bring judgement to every patient who requires pain control, as some of the comments have illustrated. It's also easier to blame society than take the time to do reflective work on your nursing practice. I'm looking at YOU, commentators.

I like how you are making the connection betweeen looking at the balance of power in health care through feminist theory. That's what feminist theory is all about.

That said, balancing power and empowerment must be accompanied by building capacity in our patients. At this point, we have an uphill battle because we are reaching beyond healthcare into social and political arenas. It seems to me that you are hinting at building capacity when you talk about motivational interviewing.

I want to challenge you on your statment that the opiod crisis finds its genesis in a (paraphrase) paternalistic framework of care. I'd like to see you expound on that (in a separate post?) because, like one other commentor, my inclincation is to say that it is in combination with financial/capitalist forces.

Let us also review the literature and marketing that originally supported and encouraged the over prescription trend. I know you meant it to be a short post, but these are topics worth pursuing, given the current crisis.

I'm a firm believer that as HCPs we have a duty to apply pressure to political and financial powers in order to accomplish the kind of changes that will improve health. On that point, I shy away from framing the opiod crisis within social theory alone. I would like to see you apply an economic perspective to the genesis and proposed treatment.

Thanks for posting and responding in a mature and professional manner. It makes the thread fun to read.

On that point, I shy away from framing the opiod crisis within social theory alone. I would like to see you apply an economic perspective to the genesis and proposed treatment.

I would love to read that paper as well. Let's not forget that economics is a social science, so so the sociological aspect is closely tied to the economics.

Economic theory would state that, minus regulation, and with the proper resources, supply obliges demand. Abundant supply is prbably one of the driving factors of the issue today. However regulation alone can't solve this problem. We can't forget black and grey markets, which would react to pick up demand the legal market falls short of supplying.

So then, we have to look at why there is such demand in the first place. Well, maybe it's because opiates are highly addictive that's one thing that would create demand. But in my opinion the real question to ask is WHY are so many people turning to opiates (and other narcotics) in the first place?? The answer to that question lies somewhere in the social realm, and the social realm is irrational and nebulous. That's part of why this problem is so tough.

It is true that opiod "epidemics" are nothing new. Thinking back to China, the Chinese had long fought to keep opium use at bay in their people. Then along came the Opium wars b/t China and Britain...those had a massive impact on shaping the world as we know it today. Those wars were fought for economic reasons, but also led to massive social issues. (If you haven't, read about the opium wars. Not very nice, but very important.).

Many other nations have zero tolerance for drug use, and much harsher punishments than some of us might fathom (look at the Philippies today, being accused of drug use is often a death sentence). Such methods are not historically effective, and disrupt cultures and economies in ways unintended. That's not the way to go for sure.

Now, I might sound tough on opiates and addiction...but the truth is I feel pity for anyone (and their friends, loved ones) caught in the grasp of addiction. It's hell on Earth. I have extensive experience with the subject, and opiate addiction is an insidious, formidable enemy. Every person battling to overcome opiates faces challenges not unlike the stresses of battle in a live war. The sorrows, the losses, the pain are all real. The stakes are very high, often life or death.

Okay, argh well I have to start getting ready to leave, but really what I am trying to say is that the problem is extremely complex, there is no easy approach. The feminist approach, while I admire the philosphical side and thought, and as a woman I like the sentiment... the method is seemingly academic and can be summed up as "treat each case as unique, and practice empathy not judgment." That is nice, but it's already in use. Please let me know if I'm way off there.

I will end on saying that, after all my talk, I sure as heck don't have the answer either! I appreciate being able to discuss the issue with you great people. I'm trying to keep with the somewhat formal tone we've been using. If DO NOT mean to speak in absolutes (I def don't believe in are absolutes). If anything is most important, it's our talking about the issues and trying to wrap our heads around the problem.

Specializes in PhD in mental health nursing.

Thank you for your insightful article on the opioid crisis. I think that your detractors have misconstrued feministic ethics of care to mean feminine ethics of care. These are two separate constructs. The other model which fits within a paradigm to assist people with substance use issues is a trauma informed care perspective. Perhaps others might find this model more acceptable. But nevertheless you have been very brave and you should publish in a peer reviewed journal in the future.

Debi

Well, my hope was that my photo would tip readers off that I am a male; but I guess that wasn't the case.

So you assume you speak for all males on the topic? Another male cannot counter with his contrasting opinion? Interesting. It does go along with your 'all males lack empathy' and 'all females approach pt care in a motherly manner' attitude.

Eyeroll