Published
I have a question that I have yet to find an answer to. We have a family whose daughter (pediatric, dev. delayed) suffered an IV infiltration. The family is planning to sue the facility and wants to video the nurses providing care. The facility forbid it, stating it was an invasion of privacy. However, after searching the forums, I found several threads of nurses working in facilities that allow hidden cameras (not just cameras monitoring the hallways or nurses stations for security reasons which is common at all facilities) but allowing families to tape staff inside the patient's room. Is this common for nursing homes? It seems that as a nurse I have the right to refuse to be taped -- although I know it is common "ambush" journalism technique.
mydesygn
244 Posts
Such interesting replies ....and funny. Thanks. I think the videotaping was to find something else since the infiltration already happened. The unfortunate thing is infiltrations can look really bad when they first happen and generally the swelling and redness go down and most families don't react this way. But with neuro delayed children who already have poor perfusion and muscle tone from being bedridden all their lives, the infiltrations can turn into a burn - this was the case. For me, I wonder if their is any known legal precedent that can be used to prevent someone from videotaping you while you work. This family was open and admitted that they were placing a camera in the room so it was easy to get risk management involved and have them refuse the videotaping on behalf of the hospital particularly since the family openly admitted that they were planning to sue but I had not thought about the camera phones and small hidden cameras that are so easy and affordable now.