Published
Hi Kids,
I recently encountered yet ANOTHER incident whereby big Pharma/Medical Device Companies are re-writing hospital policy and procedure and even going against nurse practice acts, in order to sell more wares.
Case in Point:
New epidural pump being introduced within hosp. by two RN's representing a well known medical device/medical supply company. This new pump has a BOLUS feature. These RN's were teaching all participants to use the pump, including the bolus feature, which, was taught as INITIAL BOLUS......I questioned this right away. I was ALWAYS taught that ANY epidural infusion was to be bolused only by a DR.....esp. INITIAL BOLUSES, because RN's are not trained to know epidural placement, etc.....it isn't like getting a blood return on an IV and knowing that you are "in the vein"....not to mention all the very very bad things that can go wrong...ie, dura rupture, cath migration, resp. arrest, too high of anesthetic action, paralysis of extremities, cardiac arrest, etc....
SOOO, when I asked, "Isn't this supposed to be done by a DR?, the two RN's said, "well, in some places, it is true, but we teach this feature anyway." When asking what the nurse practice act states for our state, neither of these RN's could tell me what the position was by the BON on this issue.....when asked further, "what does hosp. policy and proced. say?", they were equally unsure.
After some investigation, the dusty policy does not even ADDRESS INITIAL BOLUSING....it only vaguely speaks of increasing the continuous dosing "per doctor's orders."
What are your thoughts on this, and what does your institution say about vendors who come in and teach through inservices something that is counter to acceptable practice or written policy?
thanks, crni
jmgrn65, RN
1,344 Posts
well our epidurals are used for post thoracotomy patients, so there isn't numbing involved it is placed differently than L&D patients. It is for pain control. We monitor thier sedation, and of course vs, tele, and pulse ox.