Published
Hey everyone,
I am a manager at a facility in sunny....well cloudy VA. We are FINALLY getting rid of the disaster that is cerner's scheduling system only to be forced to swallow Kronos. I don't know anything about Kronos other than that I hear that it's really cumbersome and hard to use. A friend at another facility says they are booting Kronos because it's hard to use and they simply don't support the product. I want to heard from everyone on how this is going to affect us.
I'll be honest, I hate Cerner, their EMR sucks and the scheduler if possible is worse. I have to admit that I saw all the pretty graphs originally and thought it was great but since that time I have seen the system to be useless and more importantly it LENGTHENS the time I spend on pretty much everything.
Problem: Our IT department is making the decision for us. Really?! Why would a department that has no direct patient care make the decision for us. They don't know how we schedule or what productivity information is important to me, my director, or our cno. Frustrating!
At my last facility we had Concerro and that wasn't that bad but it just took to long to do anything and their tech support was HORRIBLE. They ended up getting rid of that because of the API buyout and moved us to the disaster that was Shift Hound. We actually lost nurses because of the way they attempted to accomplish self-scheduling. What I need to know is, is Kronos any better? Why can't I get a system that works and is easy to use. It can't be that hard can it? Nursing schedules are pretty easy, not like the docs, they are all over the place!
Please, someone help!