Published
A few weeks ago a resident was found unresponsive by the nurse, the nurse did not know the code status and didn't do cpr, it was later concluded that the resident was a full code.
This has brought up a lot of thought at work. Now clearly the nurse should of had someone check the chart and did not do so.
My question is: if I find a resident unresponsive and don't know the code status right away should I start cpr or should I wait until the code status is determined ? I was personally taught to do cpr when in doubt however the directer of the facility seems to think otherwise. Please clarify.
start CPR (but code status is kinda an important thing to know dont ya think)
I agree it is an important thing to know, which is why me and another coworker is working on a plan to make the code status more available other than having to rumble through a chart while in a panic.
I do admit, I don't know the code status of my 60 sum residents by memory, however I'm going to do everything in my power to make the code status more accessible. I.E. having a list in each wing, but ofcourse not in public view.
I got fired for starting CPR on a person who went unresponsive and had no heart rate and only occasional agonal breathing... because I did NOT leave the patient, go to the nurse's desk first, look in an enormous three-ring binder for a POLST form that is copied on white paper and blends in with all the other papers, and verify whether or not that patient wanted CPR or was a DNR. The facility that I worked for does NOT want you to initiate CPR UNTIL you have verified if they want it, since CPR on a DNR is considered battery. The facility also refuses to place identifiers, like a bracelet or a necklace, on the patients, will not put a code status on the census sheet, will not post it in the room, etc. Also, the facility will not inform new employees of its "hands-off till verified" policy.
scootertrash nurse
49 Posts
start CPR (but code status is kinda an important thing to know dont ya think)