Published Jan 2, 2007
burn out
809 Posts
I just recerted my ACLS and was surprised by the 2005 changes. It seems like a much better and controlled process but I have yet to see it work in real life. It has been a while since I was in a code but is your hospital and code teams actually running codes by the new guide lines and are the patient outcomes any better?
RYNOBLASTER30
51 Posts
To be honest with you the changes are not that drastic. Overall mortality for a patient that arrests either in or out of a hospital is about 65%, pretty high. I have been to numerous codes in my career and I hate to say it but physicans as well as nurses are very passive when it comes to the protocols. They either don't know them, or they want to check for a pulse every 5 seconds. Don't forget to that they run them entirely to long. By the time a pulse is obtained, his brain has already died. I rarely see physicians run them according to protocols. Alot of physicians are not even ACLS trained.
margaretptz
73 Posts
I feel very ignorant, but what is ACLS?
Okay let me try some common sense here, is it advanced life support certification. Starting my ADN Monday, gee I sure do have a lot to learn
EricJRN, MSN, RN
1 Article; 6,683 Posts
Yes - it's Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support, a course which teaches healthcare providers (like nurses, doctors, paramedics, etc) to manage a CPR situation or an emergency like a heart attack or stroke. In 2005, major changes were made to the steps in the ACLS protocols.
Check out the link:
ACLS Provider Course
Thank you Eric, I appreciate your response.
Havin' A Party!, ASN, RN
2,722 Posts
Congrats Margaret!