My gf has decided that she wants to become a nurse, which is great news! She is hell-bent on getting a BSN because the market/careers are better. Whether or not that's true -- I am not too sure. I have done some research on the topic but I rather get it from the 'horse's mouth.' I understand the fundamental differences between getting an ADN and a BSN. Whichever degree you choose, you take the test (NCLEX) and become an RN (correct?).
NOW, this is my question -- She wants a BSN, what's the best way in doing this?
Method #1 = Take pre-reqs or acquire an AS (pre-BSN) degree and apply to a traditional BSN program and finally take the NCLEX.
OR
Method #2 = Apply to an ADN program, take the NCLEX, then apply to an RN-to-BSN program.
Whats the benefits/disadvantages or both methods? I feel Method #2 is 'safer' in the sense that she still becomes an RN even if she somehow doesn't get into a RN-BSN program. I feel the time spent is negligible for both methods (as it would be ~4yrs). Not too sure if cost will greatly differ [i feel the ADN is more expensive than the AS; and the traditional BSN compared to RN-BSN is negligible].
1) Whats the better method in your opinion? Is there another option/way?
2) Is the job market worse for an ADN-educated RN compared to a BSN-educated RN? I figure the BSN one definitely has the advantage but is it difficult to find a job as an ADN?
3) Differences between ADN and BSN -- most lists are very generic such as (ADN:faster and limited) (BSN--longer, more opportunities to advance). Is there more to it?
Sorry for the length -- Just would like some solid expert advice from the field (of students and nurses alike). Suggestions and ideas VERY welcomed!
Thank You,
Dr. D
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Hello all,
My gf has decided that she wants to become a nurse, which is great news! She is hell-bent on getting a BSN because the market/careers are better. Whether or not that's true -- I am not too sure. I have done some research on the topic but I rather get it from the 'horse's mouth.' I understand the fundamental differences between getting an ADN and a BSN. Whichever degree you choose, you take the test (NCLEX) and become an RN (correct?).
NOW, this is my question -- She wants a BSN, what's the best way in doing this?
Method #1 = Take pre-reqs or acquire an AS (pre-BSN) degree and apply to a traditional BSN program and finally take the NCLEX.
OR
Method #2 = Apply to an ADN program, take the NCLEX, then apply to an RN-to-BSN program.
Whats the benefits/disadvantages or both methods? I feel Method #2 is 'safer' in the sense that she still becomes an RN even if she somehow doesn't get into a RN-BSN program. I feel the time spent is negligible for both methods (as it would be ~4yrs). Not too sure if cost will greatly differ [i feel the ADN is more expensive than the AS; and the traditional BSN compared to RN-BSN is negligible].
1) Whats the better method in your opinion? Is there another option/way?
2) Is the job market worse for an ADN-educated RN compared to a BSN-educated RN? I figure the BSN one definitely has the advantage but is it difficult to find a job as an ADN?
3) Differences between ADN and BSN -- most lists are very generic such as (ADN:faster and limited) (BSN--longer, more opportunities to advance). Is there more to it?
Sorry for the length -- Just would like some solid expert advice from the field (of students and nurses alike). Suggestions and ideas VERY welcomed!
Thank You,
Dr. D