DrD21

Hello all, My gf has decided that she wants to become a nurse, which is great news! She is hell-bent on getting a BSN because the market/careers are better. Whether or not that's true -- I am not too sure. I have done some research on the topic but I rather get it from the 'horse's mouth.' I understand the fundamental differences between getting an ADN and a BSN. Whichever degree you choose, you take the test (NCLEX) and become an RN (correct?). NOW, this is my question -- She wants a BSN, what's the best way in doing this? Method #1 = Take pre-reqs or acquire an AS (pre-BSN) degree and apply to a traditional BSN program and finally take the NCLEX. OR Method #2 = Apply to an ADN program, take the NCLEX, then apply to an RN-to-BSN program. Whats the benefits/disadvantages or both methods? I feel Method #2 is 'safer' in the sense that she still becomes an RN even if she somehow doesn't get into a RN-BSN program. I feel the time spent is negligible for both methods (as it would be ~4yrs). Not too sure if cost will greatly differ [i feel the ADN is more expensive than the AS; and the traditional BSN compared to RN-BSN is negligible]. 1) Whats the better method in your opinion? Is there another option/way? 2) Is the job market worse for an ADN-educated RN compared to a BSN-educated RN? I figure the BSN one definitely has the advantage but is it difficult to find a job as an ADN? 3) Differences between ADN and BSN -- most lists are very generic such as (ADN:faster and limited) (BSN--longer, more opportunities to advance). Is there more to it? Sorry for the length -- Just would like some solid expert advice from the field (of students and nurses alike). Suggestions and ideas VERY welcomed! Thank You, Dr. D