Published
I would be curious as to the rationale for such a thing....seems like a waste of time. (Like you said...the babies would be oh-so-helpful!)
It is important to check and document breakdown or no breakdown q shift...I just can't believe an otoscope is the way to go. (why do you need to stick yet another thing in these poor babies noses?)
Jenny
2curlygirls
220 Posts
Our CNM's want us to use an otoscope q shift to look inside our babes noses to check for breakdown. I wouldn't have a problem with this except that we have ONE (!) for a 40 bed unit and probably 2/3 of the kids ore on NCPAP. The unit "swallows" things very quickly and I'm sure the thing will last all of ten minutes before it's MIA. The other thing is that a lot of these babies don't tolerate having the CPAP off for anymore that very brief periods. I'm no otoscope expert and it might take me a while to assess my babies' nares (because they are oh so cooperative:uhoh3: ) They have disposable nose cones but still seems like a big infection risk.
I dunno. We keep getting more stuff like this. More check offs, more forms, more pages in the IPOC. I had an "easy" two baby assignment today and I just squeaked in getting all the charting/paperwork done! All the co-signing!!!
Sorry, this turned into an unintentional vent.