Published Jan 27, 2009
Star33
18 Posts
I have a question about care planning... the 'related to' part of the diagnosis statement, can it relate to a medical diagnosis the Dr. made even if I do not observe any symptoms? I have to write and actual and a risk for. I'm thinking I can use it in the risk for, but not the actual. Any help is appreciated :)
Daytonite, BSN, RN
1 Article; 14,604 Posts
We're not supposed to use medical diagnoses as etiologies (related to) of nursing diagnoses. The exception is to add that the etiology is due to or secondary to the medical disease. For example, Impaired gas exchange R/T alveolar-capillary membranes changes secondary to emphysema AEB abnormal blood gasses and dyspnea.
We cannot write, for example, Risk for Emphysema. With "Risk for" diagnoses you are anticipating nursing problems. A medical disease/condition is not a nursing problem. What are the causes of the medical disease? That is a risk factor you can try to care plan to prevent from getting worse. With "Risk for" diagnoses, the R/T stands for "risk factors" not related factors as in the actual problems.
Your nursing interventions for "Risk for" diagnoses are:
Thank you for your response. So, to be clear is this wrong: Risk for injury r/t seizure disorder? This is my first one and I am trying to 'get it down.' I have picked a few nursing diagnoses to work with, but I feel like they are dead ends. Like what kind of intervention or goals could one have for someone who is incontinent in diapers and can not get to the bathroom because they can not walk? My goal for the patient clearly cannot be will toilet on own... I feel stuck.
so, to be clear is this wrong: risk for injury r/t seizure disorder? this is my first one and i am trying to 'get it down.'
like what kind of intervention or goals could one have for someone who is incontinent in diapers and can not get to the bathroom because they can not walk? my goal for the patient clearly cannot be will toilet on own...