Published Feb 18, 2007
DutchgirlRN, ASN, RN
3,932 Posts
I have a patient on MSSA precautions. Methicillin Sensitive Staph Aureus. I don't get it. Ok it's sensitive to Methicillin so what's the problem? I've googled with no luck!
ShaunES
67 Posts
"MRSA may also be known as oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) and multiple-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, while non-methicillin resistant strains of S. aureus are sometimes called methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) if an explicit distinction must be made."
Sounds logical to me, maybe.
Here's google scholar articles on MSSA
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MSSA&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search
And with no acronym.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=methicillin-susceptible+Staphylococcus+aureus&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search
"MRSA may also be known as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, while non-methicillin resistant strains of S. aureus are sometimes called methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) if an explicit distinction must be made."Sounds logical to me, maybe.
Still makes no sense. It's more like an oxymoron.:crash_com
CritterLover, BSN, RN
929 Posts
i have a patient on mssa precautions. methicillin sensitive staph aureus. i don't get it. ok it's sensitive to methicillin so what's the problem? i've googled with no luck!
i've always seen mssa used to designate a staph infection as not mrsa. meaning no precautions needed, other than the usual (standard) ones.
could it be that someone who designated the need for precautions was confused?
i've always seen mssa used to designate a staph infection as not mrsa. meaning no precautions needed, other than the usual (standard) ones.could it be that someone who designated the need for precautions was confused?
now that makes alot of sense. thanks!