Published Jan 14, 2023
mforte7
38 Posts
I need some clarification regarding compensation. Hope this example makes it easy to understand my question. hypothetical:
base= 100k
percent of net collections= 20% total collections received/year= 500k
Which way do you calculate as I have seen both examples online:
a)
500,000 - 100,000 x .20 + 100,000= total compensation
b) 500,000 x .20 - 100,000 =any remaining above base is added to achieve total comp.
I hope this makes sense! The order makes a big difference and I'd love to know what is standard.
thanks!
umbdude, MSN, APRN
1,228 Posts
So your total compensation is base salary and % of collection?
If that's the case, it would be:
$100k + (0.2*$500k) = $100k + $100k = $200k
$500k total reimbursed is very high. How did you come up with that estimate?
OK thanks, that is how I have been calculating it but I got an offer which demonstrated the other way, which seemed more like a strict percentage with the guarantee of the base, rather than the base PLUS percentage (if that makes sense). I work in derm and net collections are high. Thanks again!
MentalKlarity, BSN, NP
360 Posts
mforte7 said: OK thanks, that is how I have been calculating it but I got an offer which demonstrated the other way, which seemed more like a strict percentage with the guarantee of the base, rather than the base PLUS percentage (if that makes sense). I work in derm and net collections are high. Thanks again!
I think it depends on wording:
It's either "You make your collections up to 100K, then 20% above" which is the calculation of misusing the 100K first. Or it's You have base salary of 100K PLUS 20% of collections which would be 100K plus 20% of your 500K.
DelanaRN, MSN, APRN, NP
222 Posts
I think you should also see that it says net collections, not gross...if that makes sense....which might be the figure you've been given