Airway management mishap results in tragic outcome

Specialties CRNA

Published

this is a cross-posting from ogp - and a tragic example of why the airway is not the most important thing, it is the only thing!

also, an interesting question brought up on ogp: why was a healthy young woman who appeared to be of normal body habitus intubated nasally in the first place?

doctor's error to cost $35 million

county to settle suit over brain damage

by mickey ciokajlo and tom rybarczyk

tribune staff reporters

published october 4, 2005

cook county is set to approve a $35 million medical malpractice settlement with a woman who suffered severe brain damage after undergoing a botched procedure at a county-run hospital.

the woman, a 30-year-old mother of two, was subjected to the failed procedure at oak forest hospital only because physicians there had misdiagnosed a viral infection as appendicitis, according to the lawyers involved.

the case is one of the largest settlements in cook county and matches a $35 million settlement reached last year in a case involving an anesthesiologist at northwestern memorial hospital that left a boy brain damaged. that case did not involve the county.

"the facts in the case are horrible," said cook county commissioner peter silvestri, chairman of the board's litigation subcommittee, which approved the settlement last month. "the settlement is justified and certainly should be paid."

at its meeting wednesday, the county board will be asked to approve the settlement, a record for it in medical malpractice cases. william maddux, the presiding judge of the law division, approved the settlement last week.

under the terms, the county would pay $20 million, with insurance carriers funding the remainder.

the case involves neveen morkos, a christian who immigrated to the united states to avoid religious discrimination in egypt, and dr. gustavo albear, an anesthesiologist.

morkos and her husband, hany, moved to tinley park in february 2004 to live near family members, who had immigrated a few years earlier, said eugene pavalon, the morkos' lawyer.

they did not have health insurance, so when neveen morkos experienced acute stomach pain on may 19, 2004, an ambulance drove her to oak forest hospital, which has a small emergency room.

cook county runs three hospitals that provide health care regardless of a person's ability to pay.

problem misdiagnosed

doctors told morkos she needed an emergency appendectomy. it was later determined that she had a viral infection that did not require surgery.

albear, who was 78 at the time, was called to prepare morkos for surgery.

albear medicated morkos to get her muscles to relax. since morkos would not be able to breathe on her own while medicated, albear then inserted a tube through her nose to provide oxygen to her lungs.

however, albear did not secure the tube properly, pavalon said. when the tube became dislodged, albear was unable to reinsert it, depriving morkos of oxygen.

by the time surgeons were able to perform an emergency tracheostomy to provide oxygen to morkos, 10 to 12 minutes had passed. she then went into cardiac arrest.

"there was no doubt that the negligence in this case caused this tragic occurrence and neveen's irreversible brain damage," said pavalon, a lawyer with the chicago firm pavalon, gifford, laatsch & marino. "so not only do the circumstances justify this record settlement, but this is one of those traumatic occurrences that simply should not have happened."

after the incident, morkos initially was in a vegetative state, but she has improved. though she requires round-the-clock care and cannot walk, she can now say her husband's name and recognizes her children, halana, 6, and victor, 3, pavalon said. she also can write in arabic.

morkos is in a burbank nursing, but her family desperately wants her home, pavalon said. the money from the settlement will allow them to build or buy and modify a house and provide in-home care.

morkos was not working at the time of the incident because the family was newly arrived in the country and she was caring for the children. she was college-educated and had taught computer science in egypt.

she was always looking for a better place," said nermeen morkos, neveen's older sister.

nermeen morkos said she visits her sister every day and looks forward to bringing her home.

"we hope she can walk someday," nermeen morkos said. "we are praying to god; we are waiting for a miracle for her."

albear could not be reached for comment.

when asked in the deposition he gave for the lawsuit if he remembered the episode, albear said, "i will recall for the rest of my life."

albear retired in 2004 after the incident, said patrick driscoll, head of the civil actions bureau of the cook county state's attorney's office.

oak forest hospital did not discipline albear and state records do not show any previous disciplinary issues. he renewed his license with the state last summer, but driscoll said he understands that albear, who turns 80 on wednesday, is no longer practicing.

although no parties in the case directly blame his age, pavalon said he thinks it was a factor. albear also had arthritis in his hands.

"i think probably he never should have been in that [operating] room," pavalon said.

no age restrictions

silvestri said the county does not have age restrictions for its doctors. he said when this case was discussed in committee, commissioners asked county officials to research the issue after they were told that some hospitals impose work limitations based upon age.

through a spokeswoman, officials of cook county's bureau of health services and county board president john stroger's office declined to comment before the board's approval.

albear worked for 23 years at palos community hospital before retiring in 1994. in his deposition, albear said he got a job at oak forest hospital six months later, noting he enjoyed his work and wasn't ready for retirement.

commissioner mike quigley, vice chairman of the litigation subcommittee, said albear's age was not so much the issue but rather his overall ability to perform.

"the more you hear about the case, the worse it gets," quigley said. "someone should have been able to determine that this physician was incapable of performing critical procedures. he shouldn't have been in a position to fail."

The other night, I had a pt admitted who had overdosed on drugs. He was orally intubated by the EMT, but pulled the ET tube out while en route to the hospital. He then had to be nasally intubated. I had never worked with a nasally intubated pt before (and had just read this thread before work). This was a big guy, and the ET hub was right at his nostril. Clearly, the tube had caused a lot of trauma. His nose bled for what seemed to be a whole shift; I had to change the ties twice. It also seemed that whenever I turned him he kept his head in one position - facing away from the vent. I tried weaning his propofol, but he started coughing very hard. It must be difficult to wean nasally intubated pts off the vent.

Thanks for bringing up this topic. So what are some interventions when there is a "can't intubate / can't ventilate" pt?

Ether, you can try inserting an LMA and intubating through that. Or you can try other methods of intubation, such as retrograde intubation or fiberoptic. If that doesn't work, the patient will need an emergency trach or crichothyrotomy.

One thing you have to remember with nasally intubated patients is that there is the risk of bleeding because the turbinates are easily damaged. But I have taken care of several patients as an ICU nurse who were nasally intubated because of their body habitus or the fact that they were a difficult airway, so sometimes they were intubated nasally fiberoptically.

I am sure there is a lot more to this case than the information provided. It is easy to say what went wrong & what should have been done if you are looking at it retrospectively. I am only a student & have already had instances when LMAs just would not work & I had to intubate the patient. I have also had times when attempting to exchange tubes during certain surgeries failed & a fastrack LMA had to be used (which worked). The fact of the matter is that losing an airway is a true, possible reality for ANY anesthesia provider. I am curious has to why a nasal tube was selected for this surgery. There are instances when a student is present & is allowed to practice different techniques on patients when they think it is safe to do so. I am not saying this is why, just a thought.

If he was a nasally intubated patient, then he may have been a difficult airway for one reason or another from the beginning, so there is probably a reason he was intubated nasally. If he was nasally intubated, an LMA might not have been able to be placed even though it was probably the appropriate next step.

In any case, there is a lack of information to make a decision about what should have been done.

I am only a student & have already had instances when LMAs just would not work & I had to intubate the patient

Really? If that is the case this early in your experience, then I would rethink the technique of LMA placement. LMAs are used in the difficult airway algorithm because - correctly placed - they are so reliable.

One of the CRNAs who proctored me has been giving anesthesia for nearly forty years, and he told me this very early on:

Do not tell me that you cannot ventilate. It is YOUR JOB to ventilate the patient, so you better %^&*ing figure it out. Maybe, maybe once or twice in your career will you have a patient that you really cannot ventilate. Then, it's up to you to get oxygen into that patient by whatever means necessary. Until then, don't tell me that it's the LMA, or the habitus of the patient, or some other excuse. Look to yourself first before you go blaming the equipment. And don't tell me that you cannot ventilate. You MUST ventilate.

I cried the whole way home that afternoon. But here I am, just a few weeks from graduation, and I am thankful I learned that tough lesson early on. I know that it will rear its head someday, but I have not been in a "can't intubate, can't ventilate" situation ever since. I haven't had to change LMAs, intubate mid-case (except for the one time that a small case became much bigger when the surgeon ran into an unexpected surgical issue), or chuck the LMA for the tube at induction. If the ventilation is sub-optimal for any reason before the case gets started, the case doesn't start until ventilation is adequate. Seems a no-brainer, but we have all worked with providers who have a questionable LMA and just "hope that it gets us through this case".

That is courting disaster. You MUST ventilate.

Of course I feel terrible for the patient in this case whose life will never be the same, but part of me feels so sorry for the anesthesiologist in the case. Sounds like he had a spotless record. A career filled with hard work, and good quality care for his patients, and now 30 years of dedication has been erased by this event. It breaks my heart when he says "it's something I will remember for the rest of my life". We should all learn from this and remember that no matter how much experience we have, it can still happen to us and we better know what to do when it does. I pray for the patient, her family and all the medical staff involved in this case.

Specializes in CRNA, ICU,ER,Cathlab, PACU.
If he was a nasally intubated patient, then he may have been a difficult airway for one reason or another from the beginning, so there is probably a reason he was intubated nasally. If he was nasally intubated, an LMA might not have been able to be placed even though it was probably the appropriate next step.

In any case, there is a lack of information to make a decision about what should have been done.

I agree Pete, I think the secret to cracking the litigation surrounding this unfortunate event lie within the anesthesiologists reasoning for intubating nasaly on an appy. I don't know if age had much to do with the event though. It seems quite possible that ASA difficult airway/ emergency airway management algorithms may have been underappreciated just looking at the time that had elapsed. I am sure many of us have seen young naive, or young ignorant anesthetists saved many times by our older, wiser mentors in tight situations. I wonder if he pondered bridging the transition to a surgical trach by using a 16 gau angio cath with trans tracheal jet, at least to ventilate? Poor guy, my heart goes out to him, and of course the patient. At least their misfortune will remind us of the profound consequences of what we do.

I don't understand why it took so long to provide her with oxygen.

I'm also wondering why it took so long to do an emergency tracheostomy. Where there no surgeons around? This seems odd.

:coollook:

I've always wondered how this situation would go if I was unable to oxygenate/ventilate, and unable to get an airway, which I understand it rare, but certainly possible obviously.

So this begs the question, should Nurse Anesthetists be taught how to do tracheostomies in the OR, and do any Nurse Anesthetists know how to do such procedures in emergencies? Or is this strictly a reserved procedure for Surgeons and Anesthesiologists.

Shouldn't an ansethesiologist be able to do a trach? A lot of states will let a paramedic do it, do it seems logical that an anesthesiologist would be able to...they have much more training, much more experience on the airway, a much more controlled environment...it makes me wonder what really happened...there has to be more to the story than the public is privvy to.

A good remeinder to all of us who do airway management to secure the heck out of the tube...and to always have a plan B, C, D...

Also a good remeinder to use the best method of airway mangement for the patient...again I am sure there is something we don't know about, but it seems strange to me that they did a nasal tube...

So this begs the question, should Nurse Anesthetists be taught how to do tracheostomies in the OR, and do any Nurse Anesthetists know how to do such procedures in emergencies? Or is this strictly a reserved procedure for Surgeons and Anesthesiologists.

I was wondering about this point as well. If nurse anesthetists can't do emergency trachs, seems like that should be changed.

:coollook:

CRNAs can do emergency trachs - not surgical, to be specific. But there is a nifty device that should be in every OR (or at least readily available) called an emergency crichothyrotomy kit. Here is a link that shows you what it looks like:

http://www.progressivemed.com/emsproducts/airway/emergency_airway.html

You insert this through the cricothyroid membrane and use an adaptor to attach a jet ventilator.

A surgical tracheostomy is a procedure performed by a surgeon, not anesthesia. It takes even skilled surgeons several minutes to perform this procedure, so it is literally the last option in an emergent, can't ventilate/intubate scenario.

+ Add a Comment