A New Study Shows Why Obamacare Should Have Been Single-Payer

Nurses Activism

Published

Last summer, with Obamacare's initial troubles fading from view, The New Republic's Brian Beutler noted that certain problems with the healthcare overhaul won't ever go away because they're inherent to its architecture...

... The main problem, Beutler wrote, was that you have to re-enroll every year—and there's no guarantee that you can keep your plan, that rates won't go up, or that the government subsidy won't go down.

But a new study by a group of physicians and health-policy researchers in BMC Health Services Research highlights another problem with our complex healthcare system.

In 2012, billing and insurance-related administrative costs—bureaucratic paperwork and red tape, essentially—cost the U.S. economy around $471 billion, and 80 percent of that was due to inefficiencies in our multi-payer system.

That's how much administrative waste is embedded in our fragmented, dysfunctional system of paying for care,”...

... The study found that the $375 billion saved annually with a single-payer system could be used to cover all of the nation's uninsured and upgrade coverage for millions of under-insured citizens...

Study: Single-Payer Healthcare Would Save U.S. $375 Billion | The New Republic

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.

Waiting times in NHS at worst for six years - Telegraph

NHS waiting times are at their worst level for six years, official figures show, as 3.2m are waiting for treatment it has been admitted

Basic life lesson for you. The media are not a reliable source of information. They slant stories what ever way sells maximum copy

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.

Speaking of a negative of our system, a recent article revealed all but one of the heads of the district health boards got a raise of between $10-100,000K each. Many of these same health boards couldnt afford to provide acute new grad positions for new nurses.

I have seen things kill or will kill people from delay in care on their part because the $5000 deductible is unaffordable or the meds cost is so high they can't be compliant and it is awful. So the old system would have saved the lives of folks who didn't need to die that soon or suffering from lack of care. The system is flawed now as it was then but people dying while paying for insurance unable to use it with deductibles out of reach or meds so costly the visit is silly when they go home no better than before and no hope. So they need to try again this grey abyss of crap is awful.

+ Add a Comment