Maryland Hospital Successfully -Imapct prediction anyone?

Nurses Activism

Published

ok....by now most everyone has heard of the family who successfully sued a maryland hospital after their family member suffered a mi.

http://abcnews.go.com/wnt/health/story?id=1529546

the jest of the story is that the patient ended up with brain damage secondary to the mi.the hospital had one rn one duty to care for 20 patients.the family successfully sued the hospital for negligence because it was not adequately/safely staffed to care for patients.this is a historical kinda moment...where a hospital is being held liable because it didnt "safely staff" a unit.

i want to know what predictions you guys have on "how" or "if" this will impact other hospitals?

i think my prediction is that hcf's will now begin to be held accountable not only for the number of nurses that are on duty...but also they will begin to look at "the experience level" of those nurses on duty. so these hcf's and nurse managers that have elected to unsafely staff high acquity areas with high ratios of cheaper , less experienced new grads...and not retain experienced nsg staff....will be held legally accountable when sentinel events occur.the attorney for this family had enough insight to look at "who" was responsible for ensuring that unit caring for this patient was adequately and safely staffed. other families are going to start wondering...."hmm...i wonder how many nurses were on duty the night "mom/dad/sis...or their child died"....they will hire attorneys who will not only have the insight to ask how "many" nurses were on duty...but also more importantly how "experienced" the staff was....and the hospitals who have tried to save a few bucks by hiring a unrealistic # of new grads...will be left to answer legally for it.when patients are admitted into a hospital...they deserve safe medical and nursing care....it should be everyones #1 priority.

how do you predict this will impact hospitals , nurse managers, nurse recruiters,..and nurses in general?:typing :twocents:

ok....by now most everyone has heard of the family who successfully sued a maryland hospital after their family member suffered a mi.

http://abcnews.go.com/wnt/health/sto...054&wntad=true

the jest of the story is that the patient ended up with brain damage secondary to the mi.the hospital had one rn one duty to care for 20 patients.the family successfully sued the hospital for negligence because it was not adequately/safely staffed to care for patients.this is a historical kinda moment...where a hospital is being held liable because it didnt "safely staff" a unit.

i want to know what predictions you guys have on "how" or "if" this will impact other hospitals?

i think my prediction is that hcf's will now begin to be held accountable not only for the number of nurses that are on duty...but also they will begin to look at "the experience level" of those nurses on duty. so these hcf's and nurse managers that have elected to unsafely staff high acquity areas with high ratios of cheaper , less experienced new grads...and not retain experienced nsg staff....will be held legally accountable when sentinel events occur.the attorney for this family had enough insight to look at "who" was responsible for ensuring that unit caring for this patient was adequately staffed. other families are going to start wondering...."hmm...i wonder how many nurses were on duty the night "mom/dad/sis...or their child died"....they will hire attorneys who will not only see how "many" nurses were on duty...but how "experienced" the staff was....and the hospitals who have tried to save a few bucks by hiring a unrealistic # of new grads...will be left to answer legally for it.when patients are admitted into a hospital...they deserve safe medical and nursing care....it should be everyones #1 priority.

how do you predict this will impact hospitals , nurse managers, nurse recruiters,..and nurses in general?:typing :twocents:

Link doesn't work?

hmmm...let me take another look at the link site.

This is the story that ABC news ran this past week.It is a historical legal milestone really. I believe this is the first time that a hospital has been held legally accountable for not assuring safe staffing at a hospital.The patient suffered a MI and was left with significant cardiac damage and also brain damage secondary to the MI.Prior to this they would have probably just sued the poor nurse that was left with a 20 patient assignment for negligence.I am hoping this will really be a trend setter....and attorneys will now be doing root cause analysis when sentinel events occur to see who(if anyone IE:the hospital for not assuring safe/experienced staff) is to blame.Let me look at the site/link again.I will paste the correct/working site in a moment.

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Health/story?id=1529546

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Health/story?id=1529546

I think this is the working link but to be safe .....

I will just paste the story below:

January 26, 2006 |

The New York Times

Nursing Shortage: How It May Affect YouFamily Awarded $2.7 Million over Alleged Nursing Neglect at Kansas Hospital

By LAURA MARQUEZ

Jan. 21, 2006 — Shirley Keck, a 61-year-old mother of five, was having trouble breathing one Sunday afternoon, so her daughter, Becky Hartman, rushed her to the emergency room at Wesley Hospital in Wichita, Kan.

Doctors there thought Keck had pneumonia and admitted her. But for the next seven hours, Hartman sat by her mother's bedside watching her condition deteriorate, and seeing her struggle for each breath. She said she repeatedly tried to get help from the nurses.

"I begged for help," she said. "We had plenty of time to get help, and we got none."

Keck did not have pneumonia. She was actually having a heart attack that was causing liquid to fill her lungs.

But because her primary nurse was overburdened — allegedly caring for 20 patients, more than the hospital's own guidelines recommend — the nurse didn't have time to observe Keck until she had to be resuscitated.

As a result of her heart attack, Keck suffered brain damage and was paralyzed. Her family sued the hospital and won $2.7 million.

Nursing care in America's hospitals has reached a critical shortage — the worst in 50 years, according to Peter Buerhaus, the assistant dean of Vanderbilt School of Nursing, who has studied the problem. To make matters worse, just as there are fewer nurses, the population is aging and in need of more medical care.

More Nurses Needed, Fewer Available

Hartman said she didn't sue for the money.

"I wanted them, as I wheeled my mother into that courtroom, to see what their decision to run the hospital shorthanded cost somebody," she said.

So far, it is the only successful malpractice lawsuit against a hospital citing inadequate nursing. But amid an ongoing staffing shortage, it may not be the last.

Hospitals are under pressure to keep control of their bottom lines, and nurses account for a large part of their budgets. But a recent study published in the Health Affairs medical journal found hiring more nurses could actually save a hospital money in the long run. The study found 6,700 patient deaths and 4 million days of hospital care could be avoided each year by increasing staff of registered nurses.

However, training new nurses is the problem. Last year, nursing schools had to turn away 125,000 applicants because they didn't have enough faculty to teach them. Many nursing professors are retiring just when they're needed most.

"Today, we have a cruel and unfortunate development, said Buerhaus, who co-authored the Health Affairs study. "Our current work force will get older and older and retire in large numbers in the next decade just as we see the aging of baby boomers, all 80 million of them, beginning to turn 65 and consuming more health care."

To make matters worse, patients in hospitals today are sicker than 20 years ago. In the past, a nurse could take care of more patients because some of them were recovering from minor operations. But now, with so many outpatient procedures, an overnight hospital stay is a rarity.

"We have a much higher acuity level patient who requires a lot more nursing care and we have less nurses to provide that care," said Dr. Timothy Babineau, the chief medical officer at the University of Maryland's Medical Center.

Protect Yourself

The picture may be gloomy, but prospective patients and their loved ones can try to protect themselves by finding out a hospital's nurse-to-patient ratio. The American Nurses Association Web site lists magnet hospitals — institutions recognized for excellence in nursing care, including good nurse-to-patient ratios — at http://ana.org/ancc/magnet/consumer/locations.html.

According to the association, there is no magic number for that ratio because it varies depending on what tasks a particular nursing unit performs and whether they tend to work days or nights, when patients primarily sleep.

For instance, intensive care units need more nurses on duty than general medical wards. Ideally, an ICU nurse should have no more than two patients. But the association recommends no more than six patients per nurse in any unit.

Keck's family says it will continue to talk about what happened to her as a result of too few nurses, to ensure no other family has to go through what they experienced.

+ Add a Comment