CA Board of Nursing
- 2Nov 30, '11 by htodabi was eligible to sit for the nclex for California.
wow.. so i took my exam this september, went the distance all 265 questions. unfortunately i didnt pass. got my results and "near passing standard" all across the board. so the news of failure basically tore me apart.
now what makes it worse is after submitting the reapplication form and waiting for four weeks for a reply from the board, i get a letter today stating
:::: the Board has determined that the program you completed in the Philippines is not equivalent to the minimum requirements for licensure set forth in California Code Section 1426(d).
You may be able to view Section 1426 (d) and all other codes of the California Code of Regulations by
going to our website at: www.rn.ca.gov. Once in the website there will be 'Tabs' at the top of the screen. Go to Regulations then to Nursing Practice Act and finally to California Code of Regulations.
California Code of Regulations Section 1426(d) states that theory and clinical practice shall be concurrent. The documents received state that some of the training was completed several semesters after the theory classes. ::::::
so i email the evaluator incharge of my application and she explains ::::
You have options and that is to apply to the LVN Board or in another RN Board in a different state or go for your masterís degree in nursing. But in California you are not qualified as a RN without the Masterís degree.
According to the RLE and the schoolís curriculum you should have completed the scrubs in NCM 101 and 102 but they were completed in NCM 104, 105 and 103. I am enclosing a copy of the letter that was sent to you yesterday.
Im angry and sad at the same time.. how is it possible that i was eligible to take the nclex the first time i applied and not eligible to retake now. i went from meeting the requirements of an RN to now meeting the requirements of an LVN.. how is this possible. They are saying im ineligible based on the dates of completion of my cases. The school requires 5 major 5 minor 5 assissted delivery 5 actual delivery and 5 cord dressing clincal cases which i completed or else i wouldnt have been able to graduate. All of a sudden Ca board is being technical about the completion dates of these cases. The school is well aware of the fact that completion of these cases is impossible to be concurrent with the theoretical classes . It is not always guaranteed that students will complete the needed cases in concurrent with the theoretical because there are times when there aren't any patients in the hospitals that we are rotated in. it is for this reason that the school allows completion of the needed cases through out the following semesters. We took the theoretical classes before we were allowed to go on our clinicals. but the lack of patients made it difficult to complete those 5 cases during that semester. that's why some of my cases were completed one or two semesters after the theory classes.
am i understanding this correctly? i thought all that matters was that my cases were complete regardless if it was completed in concurrent/along with theoretical or after theoretical. i learned what i was suppose to learn it just so happen that exposure to the actual thing came a semester later.
so now they are saying i can't sit for the nclex in california and i need to complete a masters degree to be qualified as an Rn in california. . is this possible? i went to school graduated with a BSN and in the end im told that i only qualify to be a LVN after submitting a reapplication for nclex. .
clarrification would be nice and i would appreciate any advice . this just makes me question if nursing is even the right fit for me cause it's been obstacles after obstacles.
- 0Nov 30, '11 by proudpinayOMG!!!Im also planning to have my reapplication again hir in CA..kabayan just wanna ask from what school did u graduate from d PHL.and what yr.?
Its vry confusing how come they allow u to take NCLEX d first time if they think ur not qualified as an RN..why they are making it difficult to be RN in CA now..
- 0Dec 1, '11 by rodmarkqI always check this nclex thread and it's always the California board comes up with this problem. Kababayan (yes, I'm filipino too), I feel your pain right now. But I'm guessing this is only in California? Because I know California is one of the few states that don't require CGFNS evaluations. Other states like FL (where I am), require a full course by course evaluation of your bsn degree in the Philippines. Now I'm guessing this is California's new rules since you've taken the exam before. I'm also guessing that California does its own evaluation since they don't require CGFNS. They don't understand the way our clinicals work in the Philippines. They don't understand that we have so many nursing students fighting to gain clinical cases that we don't get to complete them on time on that certain ncm 101 or 102 etc. But we can't blame them either, that is their rules and it's highly unlikely they'll change their minds anytime soon as your evaluator said.
That in mind, I think it's utter ridiculous for them to consider you an RN till you get a master's degree. I mean most of my friends are GN's here and they're working now. Sure they're required to get a BSN degree soon but not a master's degree. Anyways no point in fighting the California board with their new rules.
What can you do? If I were you, maybe contact your evaluator again? Tell her what if the school can send a letter concerning the date of completion of those cases? Maybe the school can explain and they can acknowledge that? If that doesn't work maybe you should just apply to a different state. Sure you'll start all over again but it's better than getting a masteral degree to be considered an RN in Cali (that's so stupid). Other states will require that you get your transcripts evaluated by CGFNS. Mind you it took me 3 months for them to process everything and evaluate. But on the bright side, my state board have no further questions regarding my education background because it's been already evaluated by CGFNS. Either way, it's going to take some time for you to retest so it seems. I'm sorry. But just posted my opinion and what I would do if I was in your situation.
- 0Dec 1, '11 by LaurenceFMI feel for you. I too am under the same predicament. Right now I'm coordinating with my dean and school in applying for a re evaluation of my credentials. My school will be clarifying my clinical cases. It's just not right that some of my classmates who are under the same program and curriculum have already been made eligible.
- 0Dec 2, '11 by eatdSAME SENTIMENTS!!!! asked around in a couple of schools here in LA. and as usual, bad news again. They said i have to take up 12 units of useless already taken **** from their college such as English, Speech, History, before they evaluate me for entrance in their nursing program.. Probably gonna take 1 1/2 to 2 years. My career timeline is so*** up!!!!!!Last edit by Silverdragon102 on Dec 2, '11 : Reason: changed to all **
- 0Dec 2, '11 by htodabit's frustrating, cause it seems like they're denying my eligibility because of the fact that my cases werent completed in concurrent with the theory classes. ... it's impossible to complete those cases during the sem of those specific theory classes that require clinical cases because of the lack of patients . ... this sucks..
- 3Dec 2, '11 by Ginger's MomQuote from htodabUS schools have to find clinicals for their students, they also have to find qualified instructors, meaning nurses who have many years of clinical experience and Master's Degree in Nursing. The US schools have to maintain a certain standard which is having a high initial pass rate on the NCLEX exam.it's frustrating, cause it seems like they're denying my eligibility because of the fact that my cases werent completed in concurrent with the theory classes. ... it's impossible to complete those cases during the sem of those specific theory classes that require clinical cases because of the lack of patients . ... this sucks..
I am seeing many posters saying the CA Board of Nursing re -reviewing their application after they failed. This is good practice, you failed.....they are trying to assess the reason for the failure since the expectation in the US is that the vast majority are expected to pass the first time, it is seen a a big failure for the school when a student fails the NCLEX the first time.
For those of applicants who choose to leave the USA to get education at a cheaper price, I am sorry you get what you pay for.