Question from a doc on NP education

Specialties NP

Published

Hello, I am coming here to see if I can pick some information off of you all. I will state that I appreciate ahead of time the responses I will hopefully receive and hope to put them to good practice.

I am an ER physician in the southeast-ish area of the US, and usually do much travelling around. I work for various staffing agencies, usually just taking the most needed bids and such. I tend to work with many different nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the various locations, mostly in the bigger ERs. The smaller ones usually it is just me since the volume is low.

The reason I come here is because I am looking or some info on the education of nurse practitioners. Sine I occasionally lecture on ER topics at one of the local PA schools in front of medical students and Pas I have been able to get a thorough glimpse at the PA ED model, which really is not too much different than a condensed version of ours it seems. I did go to a med school here in the US which also has a PA program close by so I understand this aspect.

I have noticed at many of the facilities I work at, a higher than average (in comparison to PA and other docs) the nurse practitioners often (not a total majority) seem to be oblivious to many aspects of ER level care. Some are unable to understand the interpretation of a basic set of lab panels, X-rays, and some are unable to suture well, if at all. There are a few that are Excellent at what we do (the term we used because we are a team and I dislike the dichotomy many use separating physician practice from other types of providers since it just stems unneeded conflict and perpetuates social gaps).

I have not noticed such a large gap in practice from the physician assistants that I work with though. Nearly all of them are able to suture, interpret labs, splint, suture, read most X-rays (abdominal X-rays can be very difficult to read at times, often we physicians consult rads on these). (I am also referring to flat plate x rays not CT/MRI and the such when providing the term Xray).

The gap is narrowed it seems between the PA/NP when it comes to diagnosing illness in the fast track though, I do notice it seems the PA do edge out slightly on better diagnosis (but my time is limited in the fast track, I am only there when they have a question about something, if something gets miss-triaged, or if family requests to see me, etc etc.)

But the whole point of me coming here is to ask if they teach nurse practitioners during their educational adventure how to read X-ray, suture, splint, read basic lab panels, intubate, and what not. I have looked through curriculums but course names often do not tell accurate stories in any aspect of education.

I would feel rather rude asking my coworkers these questions, since they may take it as demeaning and I like to maintain great relationships with the other providers. So again, here I am looking for a bit of info on what type of education they provide nurse practitioners in school (we use mostly FNPs in er) to see what you all thought of the situation.

Hope I am not stepping on toes with this,,,, just looking to gather some information in an objective manner.

Best wishes

A non-nursing person tomes in and posts a reputable question. People still get defensive, at least some. For all those who have gotten defensive... sorry, nursing is not the God of all professions, get over yourself.

He/she Did not ask about how "as such and such blah blah blah I have this much experience and I can do everything cuz I r sooper nurse" He asked about their education and people come in stammering off how they could go toe to toe with docs since they have been in the field for 20 years.

Get a life to those who are defensive, you are not a doctor and never will be and you need to realize that. our education is inferior, no way around that, and we can close the gap with time, but we are not doctors, and never will be. End of story. Thanks. Get back to being nurses and not doctor wanna bes.

thank you! Well said!

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
A non-nursing person tomes in and posts a reputable question. People still get defensive, at least some. For all those who have gotten defensive... sorry, nursing is not the God of all professions, get over yourself.

He/she Did not ask about how "as such and such blah blah blah I have this much experience and I can do everything cuz I r sooper nurse" He asked about their education and people come in stammering off how they could go toe to toe with docs since they have been in the field for 20 years.

Get a life to those who are defensive, you are not a doctor and never will be and you need to realize that. our education is inferior, no way around that, and we can close the gap with time, but we are not doctors, and never will be. End of story. Thanks. Get back to being nurses and not doctor wanna bes.

I think you mean "physicians" not "doctors". I am not quite sure what a "doctor wanna bes" is; within the scope of care, most NPs provide the same safe quality care that physicians do, and we are held to the same legal standards and quality measures as our physician colleagues. And while we all appreciate your personal opinion on the topic, the extant literature doesn't support it. If you want to share some studies that do, then present them and we can discuss.

Mundinger, M. O., Kane, R. L., Lenz, E. R., Totten, A. M., Tsai, W. Y., Cleary, P. D., ... & Shelanski, M. L. (2000). Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.Jama, 283(1), 59-68.

Lenz, E. R., Mundinger, M. O. N., Kane, R. L., Hopkins, S. C., & Lin, S. X. (2004). Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up. Medical Care Research and Review,61(3), 332-351.

Jennings, N., O'Reilly, G., Lee, G., Cameron, P., Free, B., & Bailey, M. (2008). Evaluating outcomes of the emergency nurse practitioner role in a major urban emergency department, Melbourne, Australia. Journal of clinical nursing, 17(8), 1044-1050.

Kane, R. L., Garrard, J., Skay, C. L., Radosevich, D. M., Buchanan, J. L., McDermott, S. M., ... & Kepferle, L. (1989). Effects of a geriatric nurse practitioner on process and outcome of nursing home care. American Journal of Public Health, 79(9), 1271-1277.

Sakr, M., Angus, J., Perrin, J., Nixon, C., Nichol, J., & Wardrope, J. (1999). Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 354(9187), 1321-1326.

Chang, E., Daly, J., Hawkins, A., McGirr, J., Fielding, K., Hemmings, L., ... & Dennis, M. (1999). An evaluation of the nurse practitioner role in a major rural emergency department. Journal of advanced nursing, 30(1), 260-268.

Specializes in Cardiac (adult), CC, Peds, MH/Substance.

The replies were in English, with imperfect grammar.

This is an English based website.. Have several auditorium seats my friend
The replies were in English, with imperfect grammar.

So what exactly are you on about?

I think you mean "physicians" not "doctors". I am not quite sure what a "doctor wanna bes" is; within the scope of care, most NPs provide the same safe quality care that physicians do, and we are held to the same legal standards and quality measures as our physician colleagues. And while we all appreciate your personal opinion on the topic, the extant literature doesn't support it. If you want to share some studies that do, then present them and we can discuss.

Mundinger, M. O., Kane, R. L., Lenz, E. R., Totten, A. M., Tsai, W. Y., Cleary, P. D., ... & Shelanski, M. L. (2000). Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.Jama, 283(1), 59-68.

Lenz, E. R., Mundinger, M. O. N., Kane, R. L., Hopkins, S. C., & Lin, S. X. (2004). Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up. Medical Care Research and Review,61(3), 332-351.

Jennings, N., O'Reilly, G., Lee, G., Cameron, P., Free, B., & Bailey, M. (2008). Evaluating outcomes of the emergency nurse practitioner role in a major urban emergency department, Melbourne, Australia. Journal of clinical nursing, 17(8), 1044-1050.

Kane, R. L., Garrard, J., Skay, C. L., Radosevich, D. M., Buchanan, J. L., McDermott, S. M., ... & Kepferle, L. (1989). Effects of a geriatric nurse practitioner on process and outcome of nursing home care. American Journal of Public Health, 79(9), 1271-1277.

Sakr, M., Angus, J., Perrin, J., Nixon, C., Nichol, J., & Wardrope, J. (1999). Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 354(9187), 1321-1326.

Chang, E., Daly, J., Hawkins, A., McGirr, J., Fielding, K., Hemmings, L., ... & Dennis, M. (1999). An evaluation of the nurse practitioner role in a major rural emergency department. Journal of advanced nursing, 30(1), 260-268.

These researches were done by whom? You are not equal to a FM physician and you are not held by the same standard... Stop drinking the cool aid!

I think I am tired of one half shooting their mouth off with nothing but an opinion. I saw an excellent post including citations to back up her opinion. Enough with the Kool-aid crap. I notice there was no respose to my statements of this Lil ole nurse running circles around first year residents. My experience and desire for knowledge made me a damn good nurse. I told an ARNP to go pound sand today because I don't feel she's in a position she belongs in. Does that mean all NP's or PA's are bad? Hell no. If your good at what your job is you have the respect of my 30+ years experience. If you don't put in the effort find another career. As a Nurse I can run circles around my 25 year old daughter. But I know my kid and I know she has the ability to become a damn good FNP because she works hard and practices harder. She has 2 great mentors her mother in law with 35 years experience and a dad with 30. To wrap it up she won't belong in critical care but she will kick butt in a Family Practice. I don't prefer MD'S I prefer DO's does that mean one is better than the other?

Get real. Put FNP's where they shine. Good night yall gave me a headache

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
These researches were done by whom? You are not equal to a FM physician and you are not held by the same standard... Stop drinking the cool aid!

"These researches" were done by the people (authors) that are listed in the citations I provided, actually its the very first thing listed for each citation. And they were published in major peer-reviewed medical journals.

As for the legal, quality, and ethical standards, that is absolutely true. Even a quick goggle search by someone with limited medical or legal experience would demonstrate that.

As for "stop drinking the cool aid" (it's actually Kool-Aid), I'll raise you a "can I have one of what you're smoking".

I love this thread. I'm an ABSN student about to graduate in October. I'm doing my community health rotation in an outpatient cancer center. There's an oncological NP who works with three other doctors and a surgeon. She said she had 15 years of RN experience in oncology before she got her APRN. She seems smart as hell and if god forbid I had cancer, I would put my faith in her. However, she doesn't have full autonomy. She said she's not able to "design" the treatment plan for her patients. I took that as, she cannot read a scan and decide which course of chemo to give. She's constantly asking the doctors questions. I'm not saying that's bad but it just makes me wonder:

How much more autonomy would she have if she was a PA?

I'm kind of leaning more towards PA. They have more clinical hours and seem to be taken a little more seriously than NPs. And I like the PA to DO option.

Does anyone know the differences in power between, in Nevada, for a PA vs a NP?

I love this thread. I'm an ABSN student about to graduate in October. I'm doing my community health rotation in an outpatient cancer center. There's an oncological NP who works with three other doctors and a surgeon. She said she had 15 years of RN experience in oncology before she got her APRN. She seems smart as hell and if god forbid I had cancer, I would put my faith in her. However, she doesn't have full autonomy. She said she's not able to "design" the treatment plan for her patients. I took that as, she cannot read a scan and decide which course of chemo to give. She's constantly asking the doctors questions. I'm not saying that's bad but it just makes me wonder:

How much more autonomy would she have if she was a PA?

I'm kind of leaning more towards PA. They have more clinical hours and seem to be taken a little more seriously than NPs. And I like the PA to DO option.

Does anyone know the differences in power between, in Nevada, for a PA vs a NP?

Power?

NP have more (or better ) scope of practice than PA in probably most (if not all) states of the union...

Do you really expect a NP who works in oncology to have the same breath of knowledge that MD/DO rad onc or hem/onc or surgical onc has? These people do a 5-7 years structured residency/fellowship...

And don't forget better bedside manner.....

Yah, scope of practice.

And no, I wouldn't expect them to have the same knowledge as a MD. I guess I just imagined that with the right background and enough education, an NP could be on the same playing field as a MD or DO. I guess I was wrong. But I suppose in a speciality like cancer, where the docs there have certs in oncology and hematology, that would be pretty hard to compete with.

What about PMHNP, could they ever be ever be equal to or close to equal to a psychiatrist? As far as skills/knowledge base is concerned. I suppose not. That's why I was liking the PO to DO option.

Specializes in ACNP-BC, Adult Critical Care, Cardiology.

How much more autonomy would she have if she was a PA?

Not knowing this person and purely basing my response on existing laws in the State of Nevada, she actually has more autonomy by law than a PA. Nevada is a state that does not require physician involvement in NP practice.

That said, I couldn't comment on why this NP says she could not "design" the treatment plan for her patients. I'm sure she knows chemotherapy regimens by heart since medicine can tend to be guideline driven. However, Oncology as a specialty tends to push boundaries and would try regimens that are off-label or "investigational". It could be that the Oncologist prefers to make the final decision on these and assumes full responsibility for the outcome.

It could also mean that she accepts that her NP program did not go into the breadth of training an Oncologist goes through (IM residency + fellowship) and that no particular NP program is poised to train the NP in Oncology alone (though some allow you to subspecialize in it). But then again, how prepared would a new PA be in Oncology?

BTW, Oncologists also rely on Diagnostic Radiologists official read of scans in addiiton to reads by Pathologists for tissue samples. That's just how medicine works in that stage of the game - when you are prescribing a highly toxic substance, you better be sure that it's for the right reason.

I'm kind of leaning more towards PA. They have more clinical hours and seem to be taken a little more seriously than NPs. And I like the PA to DO option.

It's a little more complicated than just measuring clinical hours. PA's have a generalist training with clinicals encompassing all specialties (Medicine, Peds, EM, Surgery, Family Practice).

NP's have a fragmented and specialty-focused training and only get exposed to clinicals within the scope of their specialty (FNP, ANP, PNP, PMHNP, etc). Training doesn't always follow established models in medicine.

If you have the impression that physicians seem to take PA's more seriously, that's probably more anecdotal than anything. There is no reliable survey of physicians that can reliably establish this as a fact.

+ Add a Comment