I'm looking through a powerpoint presentation, and the instructor wrote "Hickman and PICC 2 ml of 20 U Heparin to "wash" (English is not the language i'm taught, so i'm translating here) in a child over 5 kg". but in a Port-a-cath it's 5ml (50 u)...
Soooo my question is thus: If the Port is technically closer to the SVC (no long tubing like the PICC or Hick), why would you use more Heparin? wouldn't you use less? wouldn't there be less chance of clotting ?
Or is the thought that because it's closer it's more a risk for sending bigger clots so give a bigger dose?
Certifiable, BSN, RN
183 Posts
I'm looking through a powerpoint presentation, and the instructor wrote "Hickman and PICC 2 ml of 20 U Heparin to "wash" (English is not the language i'm taught, so i'm translating here) in a child over 5 kg". but in a Port-a-cath it's 5ml (50 u)...
Soooo my question is thus: If the Port is technically closer to the SVC (no long tubing like the PICC or Hick), why would you use more Heparin? wouldn't you use less? wouldn't there be less chance of clotting ?
Or is the thought that because it's closer it's more a risk for sending bigger clots so give a bigger dose?