I need some help. I originally post this to the Neonatal discussion but need more feedback.
I work in a small Level 3 NICU. Our Neo is an Ols School sort of guy. He is very hesitant to allow us to place picc lines on kids that need longer term IV therapy. His rationale is that he does not want to put an invasive line in a kid if he can avoid it. Our Primary TPN solution is D12.5 HA. We also give lots of gentamicin, vancomysin, amikacin, acyclovir, etc. Now we all know that these solutions are vesicants etc. Plus our HA comes up with the label that clearly says in bold type "GIVE THROUGH CENTRAL LINE ONLY."
If we try and petition early on for a picc he will often say that he wants to get the kiddo of IV's in a few days etc. Then when everyting has been blown he will allow us to attempt a picc. Unfortunately this is when there is no acces left.
What I am needing is some journal articles, stats or other info regarding infection rates of piccs vs peripheral. Cost efficacy of the same.
He will sometimes alter his position if the proper information is presented.
Can anyone please help???
Needless to say this is a very difficult situation for us nurses. We are having babies stuck in excess of 20++ times in a single day. He thinks it is a skill issue, I assure you that it is not. Most of us are experienced nurses in our area.
I know all of the arguments, but I must have soem reputable documentation to present. I am working towards us developing a unit guideline so that this issue can possibly be put to rest. The Haldol in the coffe pot didn't do the trick so now I must do my homework.....