Specializes in Pediatric Private Duty; Camp Nursing.
My sister's been in the Atlanta area news lately d/t a group A strep infection she had developed back in April. Some news outlets get it right, but several are SO ready to instill hysteria by calling it something other than what it is. First I was irked that one of them decided to call it Scarlet Fever (I even wrote to the reporter to correct him, concerned that erroneous information would cause hysteria that Scarlet Fever routinely shuts down organs and kills people, but he never changed his online report), and now this news outlet decided she had the flesh-eating bacteria. Yes, group A strep causes both of these things, but it's NOT what she actually had. They interview my sister and bro-in-law, and they clearly tell everyone it was a systemic infection, her organs had shut down. Still dangerous, but not as sexy or glamorous as the flesh-eating variety. This really bothers me. What say you?
CloudySue
710 Posts
My sister's been in the Atlanta area news lately d/t a group A strep infection she had developed back in April. Some news outlets get it right, but several are SO ready to instill hysteria by calling it something other than what it is. First I was irked that one of them decided to call it Scarlet Fever (I even wrote to the reporter to correct him, concerned that erroneous information would cause hysteria that Scarlet Fever routinely shuts down organs and kills people, but he never changed his online report), and now this news outlet decided she had the flesh-eating bacteria. Yes, group A strep causes both of these things, but it's NOT what she actually had. They interview my sister and bro-in-law, and they clearly tell everyone it was a systemic infection, her organs had shut down. Still dangerous, but not as sexy or glamorous as the flesh-eating variety. This really bothers me. What say you?
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/19897908/fundraiser-held-for-flesh-eating-bacteria-survivor