Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,723 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
| No. 10 | 
Sep 23, 2005, 10:09 PM
 from a student =) Originally Posted by siri Hello, zoeboboey,
The question read that an IV was ordered and why. The best answer to support the rationale of ordering the pain med IV is that to give it IM or SQ, absorption would be delayed due to decreased circulatory volume.
Hope this clears it up for you.
hi!i was the one who posted the question from a review, i have no idea who was the author of that question or from what book it was based.can you give us tips on how to answer such questions because it is quite confusing. gonna take nclex and some more exams in a couple of months (i am praying! and working on it  ) as early as now, i am preparing for it. i am wondering how am i going to attack question since, my answer was A.direct answer to the question, i would've answered B if the quuestion was 'why was not IM or SC given?". still confused on how to answer. help us students! thanks  and God bless!
 | | Advertisement Sponsored Links | | | | No. 11 |
Sep 25, 2005, 12:06 AM
The most correct answer is B but I would argue the physiology underlying even that answer because it soooo depends on the size of the burn and the degree of resuscitation.
The most correct response would be interrupted/diminished blood flow to SC/IM sites.
| | No. 12 |
Sep 25, 2005, 01:40 AM
Originally Posted by gwenith The most correct answer is B but I would argue the physiology underlying even that answer because it soooo depends on the size of the burn and the degree of resuscitation.
The most correct response would be interrupted/diminished blood flow to SC/IM sites.
Thanks, that is what I was thinking - if it was 3rd degree burns over a majority of the body, versus second degree over a small area, it would make a big difference.
Thanks for taking the time!
| | No. 13 |
Sep 25, 2005, 04:37 PM
copyright fyi Originally Posted by suzanne4 Hate to throw this in, but copying a question in its entirety here, including all four of the answers, is against US copyright laws. That question belongs to who ever the author was, and without their permission, cannot be reproduced here.
Please be careful with this............. http://www.cas.usf.edu/english/walke...cyberprop.html
However, electronic mail and synchronous communication sites such as Internet Relay Chat (IRC) and various forms of MUDs (Multi-User Dungeons or Dimensions)--sites which allow for "live" communication between users--are not protected under the Copyright Act. The Report says: A transmission, in and of itself, is not a fixation. While a transmission may result in a fixation, a work is not fixed by virtue of the transmission alone. Therefore "live" transmissions via the NII [National Information Infrastructure] will not meet the fixation requirement, and will be unprotected under the Copyright Act, unless the work is being fixed at the same time as it is being transmitted. Fair Use and Abuse
Infringement is infringement--the doctrine of fair use doesn't negate that; it is simply an "affirmative defense." But Section 107 of the Copyright Act plainly says: [T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies of phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -- (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work
| | No. 14 |
Sep 25, 2005, 04:46 PM
Originally Posted by mwbeah http://www.cas.usf.edu/english/walke...cyberprop.html [T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies of phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -- (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work
THANK YOU for that. So I am gathering that using the question in this way is all right? Sorry I have a headache and transmisson of data is impaired.
I absolutely ADORE your "signature quote" - WOW!
| | No. 15 |
Sep 26, 2005, 09:42 AM
The Admin Team has been contacted in the past by lawyers that articles/ original info copied from other sites is in violation of copyright laws. We ask that our members be judicious in their posts and be aware of the laws.
From our TOS found at the bottom of every page:
Copyrighted Material:
No "spreading of copyrighted Material": Please do not upload, attach or post anything that is copyright or licensed without prior consent of the owner. For example, if you want to post content from an online article, do not post the whole article, post a partial synopsis, and then a link to the source.
| | No. 16 |
Sep 26, 2005, 03:08 PM
Originally Posted by NRSKarenRN The Admin Team has been contacted in the past by lawyers that articles/ original info copied from other sites is in violation of copyright laws. We ask that our members be judicious in their posts and be aware of the laws.
From our TOS found at the bottom of every page:
Copyrighted Material:
No "spreading of copyrighted Material": Please do not upload, attach or post anything that is copyright or licensed without prior consent of the owner. For example, if you want to post content from an online article, do not post the whole article, post a partial synopsis, and then a link to the source.
Karen would you please delete the thread if it is a problem? Thank you very much.
| | No. 17 |
Sep 26, 2005, 03:34 PM
For you information (to get up to speed) Originally Posted by zoeboboey Karen would you please delete the thread if it is a problem? Thank you very much.
The Fair Use Law can be accessed at: http://www.benedict.com/info/Law/FairUse.aspx |
| 200 members
1,802 guests 2,002
| 3 | | | 46 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 10 | | | 23 | | | 2 | | | 14 | | | 63 | | | 14 | |
| 44 | | | 1 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | | 17 | | | 11 | | | 16 | | | 16 | | | 42 | | | 14 | | | 21 | | | 23 | | | 20 | | | 24 | |
|
Nursing News