Published Jul 18, 2013
indianguy1984
1 Post
Had a patient with dengue fever - she ate soya sauce chicken and then vomited.
The nurse panicked after she thought it looked coffee ground and she decided to use a urine dipstick to test the vomitus for blood.
It turned to read positive for blood.
I read that urine dipstick is for urine and not for vomit.
I went to google
"Using a urine dipstick to test vomit for blood is a waste of time. Vomitus invariably contains sufficient traces of haemoglobin to cause a positive reaction" (Crash Course: Surgery, Angeliki Kontoyannis, Helen Sweetland (2008).
But my friend told me it's correct to use a urinedipstick.
Any ideas?
KelRN215, BSN, RN
1 Article; 7,349 Posts
Urine dipstick is for urine, that's why it's called a URINE dipstick. Gastroccult is for testing for occult blood in gastric contents.
ABJrrw
On 7/18/2013 at 5:38 PM, KelRN215 said: Urine dipstick is for urine, that's why it's called a URINE dipstick. Gastroccult is for testing for occult blood in gastric contents.
Can search for this article online, apparently the dipstick can be used as a quick indicator prior to more extensive testing:
“Presence of blood in gastric juice: A sensitive marker for gastric cancer screening in a poor resource setting“