At my burn center, we place new burns in silvadene dressings BID (or we have a protocol for silver nitrate soaks if I'm on-call, the burn isn't life-threatening and the attending isn't coming in until the morning) for the few days before they are grafted. Then we switch to xeroform. They keep in silvadene (SSD) for long term if they aren't getting grafted, then downgrade to xeroform and then perhaps plain bacitracin. I have read that the burn center at Mass General has long used silver nitrate soaks instead of SSD.
I started work at a new wound clinic that hardly sees many burns, but whenever we get one, the doctor says that there is "new research" that says silvadene causes terrible infections, is ineffective and it's hard/messy for patients to do at home ( I agree with the hard/messy part. It takes dedicated BID changes and SSD can macerate intact skin) and so he prefers to use just bacitracin and gauze. I was shocked to hear that and I can't find this research, nor have I heard of it. I have seen SSD heal many many burns plus it is antimicrobial. It would be sacrilege to forgo the SSD at my burn center. I can see infection setting in if the silvadene burn dressing isn't changed BID, but not otherwise. Plus, the benefit of SSD is that it cools down the burning sensations.
What topical do you all use in the acute phase of burns? What is best practice?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
At my burn center, we place new burns in silvadene dressings BID (or we have a protocol for silver nitrate soaks if I'm on-call, the burn isn't life-threatening and the attending isn't coming in until the morning) for the few days before they are grafted. Then we switch to xeroform. They keep in silvadene (SSD) for long term if they aren't getting grafted, then downgrade to xeroform and then perhaps plain bacitracin. I have read that the burn center at Mass General has long used silver nitrate soaks instead of SSD.
I started work at a new wound clinic that hardly sees many burns, but whenever we get one, the doctor says that there is "new research" that says silvadene causes terrible infections, is ineffective and it's hard/messy for patients to do at home ( I agree with the hard/messy part. It takes dedicated BID changes and SSD can macerate intact skin) and so he prefers to use just bacitracin and gauze. I was shocked to hear that and I can't find this research, nor have I heard of it. I have seen SSD heal many many burns plus it is antimicrobial. It would be sacrilege to forgo the SSD at my burn center. I can see infection setting in if the silvadene burn dressing isn't changed BID, but not otherwise. Plus, the benefit of SSD is that it cools down the burning sensations.
What topical do you all use in the acute phase of burns? What is best practice?