Members are discussing the term "septic shower" used by a doctor to describe a patient's symptoms, with some users sharing their own interpretations of the term based on their medical experience. There is debate about the accuracy of the doctor's explanation and the specific medical definition of "septic" in relation to infections and immune responses.
As far as medical terminology goes, "Septic" is not particularly well defined, although based on the generally agreed upon definitions the doctor explaining it to you was not correct.
"Septic shower" usually refers to a release of either pathogens themselves (bacterial/fungal vegetations, etc) or their byproducts where they follow bloodflow to another part of the body, these individual particulates that are released are usually referred to "septic emboli". By definition, these emboli must be the pathogens or the products of pathogens to be called "septic", that's what the word means. There must be an infectious pathogen for there to be sepsis, otherwise it's SIRS. Sepsis is SIRS plus a causative infection.
I've heard of this term before, but definitely not in the way this doc used it.
When I used to work infusion nursing, "septic shower" was what happened when one unknowingly flushed an infected central line and inadvertently dumped all of those pathogens into the blood stream at once. The ensuing immune response to an overload (versus a removal) of pathogens can be fatal.
TheNGTKingRN
208 Posts
A doctor used the term "septic shower" when talking with me about a patient and their presenting symptoms. She tried to explain it as:
I've never heard of this prior. Any other nurses ever heard of this term?
Pt information:
Original reason for admission was left groin wound vac secondary to hematoma/infection sp hernia repair.